Rubbernecking Effect of Intimate Information on Twitter: When Getting Attention Works Against Interpersonal Attraction

Social networking sites offer individuals an opportunity to document and share information about themselves, as well as engaging in social browsing to learn about others. As a micro-blogging site within which users often share information publicly, Twitter may be a particularly suitable venue that can help satisfy both of these motivations. This study investigates how viewers react to disclosure of intimate information on Twitter. Specifically, the impact of disclosure intimacy is studied on attention that viewers pay to a Twitter page, reduction in their uncertainty about the attributes of the page owner, and their interpersonal attraction to the owner of the page. A total of 618 adult online panel members viewed one of six Twitter pages that contained either low-intimacy or high-intimacy tweets. Analyses indicated that viewers exposed to the Twitter pages containing high-intimate information paid more attention to the pages, were more confident about the attributions they could make about the page owner, yet were less willing to pursue further socialization with the page owner. Furthermore, attributional confidence mediated and perceived similarity moderated the relationship between disclosure intimacy and interpersonal attraction. This interaction between disclosure intimacy and perceived similarity was such that viewers who considered the page owner to be similar (dissimilar) to themselves were more (less) socially attracted to page owners who disclosed intimate information. These findings suggest that while intimate information shared on a Twitter page draws attention, this does not necessarily result in further socialization with the page owner--an effect we named as the "rubbernecking effect" of intimate information.

[1]  Glen W. Clatterbuck.  Attributional Confidence and Uncertainty in Initial Interaction , 1979 .

[2]  Derek Lackaff,et al.  The Relationship between Traditional Mass Media and “Social Media”: Reality Television as a Model for Social Network Site Behavior , 2010 .

[3]  David L. Altheide.  The Control Narrative of the Internet , 2004 .

[4]  Natalya N. Bazarova,et al.  Self‐Disclosure in Social Media: Extending the Functional Approach to Disclosure Motivations and Characteristics on Social Network Sites , 2014 .

[5]  R. Horton,et al.  On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[8]  Sabrina C. Eimler,et al.  Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus? Examining Gender Differences in Self-Presentation on Social Networking Sites , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  Can Blogging Enhance Subjective Well-Being Through Self-Disclosure? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  Urs Gasser,et al.  Teens, social media, and privacy , 2013 .

[11]  Michael Sunnafrank.  Predicted Outcome Value During Initial Interactions A Reformulation of Uncertainty Reduction Theory , 1986 .

[12]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  "We never talk about that": A comparison of cross-sex friendships and dating relationships on uncertainty and topic avoidance , 1998 .

[14]  Jennifer L Bevan,et al.  How Are Important Life Events Disclosed on Facebook? Relationships with Likelihood of Sharing and Privacy , 2015, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  P. D. Laat.  Online diaries: Reflections on trust, privacy, and exhibitionism , 2008, Ethics and Information Technology.

[16]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[17]  Brett A. Bumgarner,et al.  You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults , 2007, First Monday.

[18]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[19]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[20]  Melanie Nguyen,et al.  Comparing Online and Offline Self-Disclosure: A Systematic Review , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  Natalya N. Bazarova.  Public Intimacy: Disclosure Interpretation and Social Judgments on Facebook , 2012 .

[22]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Personality Impressions Based on Facebook Profiles , 2007, ICWSM.

[23]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating , 2011, Commun. Res..

[24]  Seung-A. Annie Jin,et al.  Peeling back the multiple layers of Twitter’s private disclosure onion: The roles of virtual identity discrepancy and personality traits in communication privacy management on Twitter , 2013, New Media Soc..

[25]  Lemi Baruh,et al.  Mediated Voyeurism and the Guilty Pleasure of Consuming Reality Television , 2010 .

[26]  Yoon Hyung Choi,et al.  Self‐Disclosure Characteristics and Motivations in Social Media: Extending the Functional Model to Multiple Social Network Sites , 2015 .

[27]  M. Consalvo,et al.  Fono, David, and Raynes-Goldie, Kate. . Hyperfriends and Beyond: Friendship and Social Norms on LiveJournal. , 2006 .

[28]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  The Effects of Other-Generated and System-Generated Cues on Adolescents' Perceived Attractiveness on Social Network Sites , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Kevin Wise,et al.  Emotional Responses During Social Information Seeking on Facebook , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  D. Ariely,et al.  Less is more: the lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE OF PERCEIVED HOMOPHILY IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[32]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Human Communication Research Issn 0360-3989 the Disclosure–intimacy Link in Computer-mediated Communication: an Attributional Extension of the Hyperpersonal Model , 2022 .

[33]  Sonja Utz,et al.  The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  Information Sharing and Relationships on Social Networking Sites , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  Michael Stefanone,et al.  Writing for Friends and Family: The Interpersonal Nature of Blogs , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..