Weight Determination of Sustainable Development Indicators Using a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method

Sustainable development (SD) evaluations have attracted considerable attention from governments and scientific communities around the world. The objective and quantitative calculation of the importance of sustainable assessment indicators is a key problem in the accurate evaluation of SD. Traditional methods fail to quantify the coupling effects among indicators. This paper presents a weight determination approach based on the global sensitivity analysis algorithm known as the extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (EFAST). This method is efficient and robust and is not only able to quantify the sensitivity of the evaluation indictors to the target, but can also quantitatively describe the uncertainties among the indictors. In this paper, we analyze the sensitivity of 18 indicators in a multi-index comprehensive evaluation model and weigh the indicators in the system according to their importance. To verify the feasibility and advantages of this new method, we compare the evaluation result with the traditional entropy method. The comparison shows that the EFAST algorithm can provide greater detail in an SD evaluation. Additionally, the EFAST algorithm is more specific in terms of quantitative analysis and comprehensive aspects and can more effectively distinguish the importance of indicators.

[1]  Frits C. R. Spieksma,et al.  Multi index assignment problems: complexity, approximation, applications , 2000 .

[2]  Jing-nan Sun,et al.  Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. , 2006, Journal of environmental sciences.

[3]  Xing Ling,et al.  Evaluation of Agriculture Sustainable Development Level in China , 2015 .

[4]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  J. Ruggiero Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011 .

[6]  D. Moran,et al.  Measuring sustainable development - Nation by nation , 2008 .

[7]  Hu Si,et al.  Environmental evaluation for sustainable development of coal mining in Qijiang, Western China , 2010 .

[8]  Peter Nijkamp Review: Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Built Environment , 2006 .

[9]  Shuguo Wang,et al.  A Global Sensitivity Analysis of Soil Parameters Associated With Backscattering Using the Advanced Integral Equation Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Wei Chu,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of various sensitivity analysis methods: A case study with a hydrological model , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Michael R. Heath,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of an end-to-end marine ecosystem model of the North Sea: factors affecting the biomass of fish and benthos , 2014 .

[12]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Gernot Stöglehner,et al.  Ecological footprint — a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies , 2003 .

[14]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[15]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of groundwater transport , 2015 .

[16]  Jing Wang,et al.  Parameter sensitivity analysis of crop growth models based on the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Y. Phillis,et al.  Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis , 2004 .

[18]  Patrizia Lombardi,et al.  Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Built Environment , 2005 .

[19]  A. K. Dikshit,et al.  Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry , 2007 .

[20]  Debabrata Das,et al.  The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Where Does India Stand? , 2019, Journal of Rural Development.

[21]  Ulrika Palme,et al.  Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities? , 2008 .

[22]  D. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data , 2010 .

[23]  C. R. Karger,et al.  Sustainability evaluation of decentralized electricity generation , 2009 .

[24]  Qiao Jia-jun Application of Improved Entropy Method in Henan Sustainable Development Evaluation , 2004 .

[25]  R. V. Rao,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection , 2010 .

[26]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[27]  S. Feng,et al.  Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing , 2013 .

[28]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[29]  Koen Decancq,et al.  Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Well-Being: An Overview , 2010 .