Scheimpflug camera in the quantitative assessment of reproducibility of high‐speed corneal deformation during intraocular pressure measurement

The paper presents an original analysis method of corneal deformation images from the ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera (Corvis ST tonometer). Particular attention was paid to deformation frequencies exceeding 100 Hz and their reproducibility in healthy subjects examined repeatedly. A total of 4200 images with a resolution of 200 × 576 pixels were recorded. The data derived from 3 consecutive measurements from 10 volunteers with normal corneas. A new image analysis algorithm, written in Matlab with the use of the Image Processing package, adaptive image filtering, morphological analysis methods and fast Fourier transform, was proposed. The following results were obtained: (1) reproducibility of the eyeball reaction in healthy subjects with precision of 10%, (2) corneal vibrations with a frequency of 369 ± 65 Hz (3) and amplitude of 7.86 ± 1.28 µm, (4) the phase shift within two parts of the cornea of the same subject of about 150°. The result of image sequence analysis for one subject and deformations with a corneal frequency response above 100 Hz.

[1]  Edward Wylegala,et al.  Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Damien Gatinel,et al.  Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar flap. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Caitriona Kirwan,et al.  Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  An ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera for evaluation of corneal deformation response and its impact on IOP measurement. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Renato Ambrósio,et al.  Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera. , 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[7]  G. Labiris,et al.  Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus , 2012, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[8]  Robert Koprowski,et al.  Automatic method of analysis and measurement of additional parameters of corneal deformation in the Corvis tonometer , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[9]  Sunil Shah,et al.  The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. , 2006, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[10]  Gabor Nemeth,et al.  Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery. , 2014, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[11]  Aleksandar Peulic,et al.  Segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 2014, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[12]  Sashia Bak-Nielsen,et al.  Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  Steven E. Wilson,et al.  Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. , 2006, Experimental eye research.

[14]  Min Gao,et al.  Corneal Biomechanical Assessment Using Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  S. S. Park,et al.  Dynamic response of intraocular pressure and biomechanical effects of the eye considering fluid-structure interaction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Jesper Hjortdal,et al.  Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[17]  Albert S. Kobayashi,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of human cornea , 1973 .

[18]  Akira Sawada,et al.  Intraocular pressure alterations after visual field testing , 2014, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[19]  Rohit Shetty,et al.  Biomechanics of the Cornea Evaluated by Spectral Analysis of Waveforms from Ocular Response Analyzer and Corvis-ST , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  W. Feuer,et al.  Autoregulation of human optic nerve head circulation in response to increased intraocular pressure. , 1997, Experimental eye research.

[21]  Mujtaba A. Qazi,et al.  Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  J. Alió,et al.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post‐laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  Matthias Krug,et al.  Impact of chamber pressure and material properties on the deformation response of corneal models measured by dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging. , 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[24]  S. Marcos,et al.  Corneal Viscoelastic Properties from Finite-Element Analysis of In Vivo Air-Puff Deformation , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Robert Koprowski,et al.  Selected parameters of the corneal deformation in the Corvis tonometer , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[26]  Julian Garcia-Feijoo,et al.  Concordancia entre la tonometría de Goldmann, Icare Pro y Corvis ST , 2014 .

[27]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  Robert Koprowski,et al.  Machine learning, medical diagnosis, and biomedical engineering research - commentary , 2014, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[29]  Michael W. Belin,et al.  Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties , 2013 .

[30]  Rodolfo Mastropasqua,et al.  Structural modifications and tissue response after standard epi-off and iontophoretic corneal crosslinking with different irradiation procedures. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  Ana Kuzmanic Skelin,et al.  Laser Spot Tracking Based on Modified Circular Hough Transform and Motion Pattern Analysis , 2014, Sensors.

[32]  Michele Lanza,et al.  Evaluation of Corneal Deformation Analyzed with Scheimpflug Based Device in Healthy Eyes and Diseased Ones , 2014, BioMed research international.

[33]  Wiesław Sródka,et al.  Evaluating the material parameters of the human cornea in a numerical model. , 2011, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[34]  Giuliano Scarcelli,et al.  Numerical model of optical coherence tomographic vibrography imaging to estimate corneal biomechanical properties , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  N. Congdon,et al.  Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  Aachal Kotecha,et al.  What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[37]  R. Krueger,et al.  Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[38]  Chuanqing Zhou,et al.  Corneal hysteresis with intraocular pressure of a wide range: a test on porcine eyes. , 2013, Journal of refractive surgery.

[39]  Yilei Shao,et al.  Phacoemulsification Induced Transient Swelling of Corneal Descemet’s Endothelium Complex Imaged with Ultra-High Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  Yuyi You,et al.  The dynamic response of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude to acute hemodynamic changes in normal and glaucomatous eyes. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  Konstantin Kotliar,et al.  Air-pulse corneal applanation signal curve parameters for the characterisation of keratoconus , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[42]  Walton Nosé,et al.  Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of -19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[43]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Assessment of the epithelium's contribution to corneal biomechanics. , 2008, Experimental eye research.

[44]  David Touboul,et al.  Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[45]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[46]  Xinghuai Sun,et al.  A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[47]  D. Patel,et al.  Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  F. Hafezi,et al.  Corneal collagen cross-linking for ectasia after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: long-term results. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[49]  N. Congdon,et al.  Corneal structure and biomechanics: impact on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma , 2006, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[50]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[51]  Q. Ren,et al.  Air puff induced corneal vibrations: theoretical simulations and clinical observations. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.