A Preliminary Study to Propose an Algorithm for Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Objectives: There is no consensus on the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). In this regard, this study proposed an algorithm for CSP management with consecutive outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study, the data of 44 patients with CSP were collected, and the diagnosis was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS). Unstable patients underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE), and the fetal reduction was done for patients with the fetal heart rate (FHR). In addition, patients received systemic methotrexate (MTX) injections according to their beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels and then were followed on a predetermined schedule by β-hCG levels and TVS. Finally, prophylactic UAE was considered for patients with ongoing bleeding, placental hypervascularity, and the prospect of limited access to care. Results: Patients were within the age range of 33.9±4.9 years and the gestational age of 7.37±1.57 weeks. Twenty-two patients (50%) had vaginal bleeding, 3 of whom were unstable and underwent UAE. Five patients underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, and fourteen patients with FHR underwent a fetal reduction. Based on β-hCG levels and changes, and placental vascularity, 4 patients received no treatment. In general, 11, 2, and 9 patients received single, double, and multiple MTX injections. A total of 10 patients underwent both multi-doses of MTX and prophylactic UAE. The median period to reach undetectable β-hCG levels was 7.3 weeks and the median interval to start menstruation was 2.8 weeks. In addition, the pregnancy remnant was resolved 3.6 months after the treatment. On the follow-up, no curettage or hysterectomy was needed and seven patients became pregnant (15.9%), 2 of whom presented recurrent CSP (28.6%). Conclusions: The proposed stepwise algorithm could be employed for CSP management with accountable outcomes, low hysterectomy rates, and fertility preservation.

[1]  M. Healey,et al.  Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: Incidence and Factors Associated with Conversion to Surgery from Medical Management. , 2019, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[2]  F. Sayehmiri,et al.  Prevalence, causes, and complications of cesarean delivery in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, International journal of reproductive biomedicine.

[3]  Wojciech Panek,et al.  Cesarean scar pregnancy – a new challenge for obstetricians , 2018, Journal of ultrasonography.

[4]  A. Correia,et al.  How to Treat Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Difficult and Rare Case , 2017 .

[5]  S. Uludağ,et al.  Comparison of systemic and local methotrexate treatments in cesarean scar pregnancies: time to change conventional treatment and follow-up protocols. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  A new minimally invasive treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy and cervical pregnancy. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Ya-dan Jia,et al.  Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy , 2016, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[8]  P. Peng,et al.  Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy , 2015, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[9]  L. Hiersch,et al.  Outcome, complications and future fertility in women treated with uterine artery embolization and methotrexate for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. , 2014, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[10]  A. Zhao,et al.  Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study , 2014, BMC Women's Health.

[11]  J. Abbott,et al.  Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  E. Nowak-Markwitz,et al.  Cutoff value of human chorionic gonadotropin in relation to the number of methotrexate cycles in the successful treatment of ectopic pregnancy. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  T. Rosen Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. , 2008, Clinics in perinatology.

[14]  E. Sawyer,et al.  Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[15]  S. Haberman,et al.  Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancies: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  N. Yaegashi,et al.  Successful conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with uterine artery embolization. , 2005, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  K. Seow,et al.  Subsequent pregnancy outcome after conservative treatment of a previous cesarean scar pregnancy , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[18]  J. Tseng,et al.  Cesarean scar pregnancy: quantitative assessment of uterine neovascularization with 3-dimensional color power Doppler imaging and successful treatment with uterine artery embolization. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  Wei Wang,et al.  Cesarean scar pregnancy: a case report. , 2004, Chinese medical journal.

[20]  R. Halperin,et al.  Ectopic pregnancies in Caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical centre. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[21]  Ming‐Jie Yang,et al.  Combination of transarterial embolization of uterine arteries and conservative surgical treatment for pregnancy in a cesarean section scar. A report of 3 cases. , 2003, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[22]  F. Ghezzi,et al.  Conservative treatment by chemotherapy and uterine arteries embolization of a cesarean scar pregnancy. , 2002, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[23]  P. Hohlfeld,et al.  Pregnancy in a Cesarean scar , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  A New Minimally Invasive Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Cervical Pregnancy , 2017 .

[25]  J. Dungan Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position , 2010 .

[26]  J. Larsen,et al.  Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus--an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. , 1978, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.