Application of a Navier–Stokes Solver to the Study of Open Rotor Aerodynamics

This paper establishes a proven computational approach for open rotor configurations that can be used as a basis for further studies involving open rotor aerodynamics and design. Many of the difficulties encountered in the application of computational fluid dynamics to an open rotor engine arise due to the removal of the casing that is present in conventional aero-engine turbomachinery. In this work, an advanced three-dimensional Navier–Stokes solver is applied to the open rotor. The approach needed to accurately capture the aerodynamics is investigated with particular attention to the mesh configuration and the specification of the boundary conditions. A new three-step meshing strategy for generating the mesh and the most suitable type of far-field boundary condition are discussed. A control volume analysis approach is proposed for post-processing the numerical results for the rotor performance. The capabilities of the solver and the applied methodology are demonstrated at both cruise and take-off operating conditions. The comparison of the computational results with the experimental measurements shows good agreement for both data trend and magnitudes.

[1]  David L. Whitfield,et al.  Three-dimensional unsteady Euler solutions for propfans and counter-rotating propfans in transonic flow , 1987 .

[2]  G. Knip,et al.  Technology and benefits of aircraft counter rotation propellers , 1981 .

[3]  Victor Mileshin,et al.  Open Counter-Rotation Fan Blades Optimization Based on 3D Inverse Problem Navier-Stokes Solution Method With the Aim of Tonal Noise Reduction , 2008 .

[4]  L. J. Bober,et al.  Improved Euler analysis of advanced turboprop propeller flows , 1986 .

[5]  D. M. Black,et al.  Evaluation of wind tunnel performance testings of an advanced 45 deg swept 8-bladed propeller at Mach numbers from 0.45 to 0.85 , 1982 .

[6]  T. Kirker Procurement and testing of a 1/5 scale advanced counter rotating propfan model , 1990 .

[7]  Victor Mileshin,et al.  Computational and Experimental Investigation of Unsteady and Acoustic Characteristics of Counter-Rotating Fans , 2004 .

[8]  John F. Groeneweg,et al.  NASA Advanced Propeller Research , 1988 .

[9]  Leigh Lapworth,et al.  PADRAM: Parametric Design and Rapid Meshing System for Turbomachinery Optimisation , 2003 .

[10]  Roy D. Hager,et al.  Advanced Turboprop Project , 1988 .

[11]  M. Nallasamy,et al.  Euler analysis of the three dimensional flow field of a high-speed propeller: Boundary condition effects , 1987 .

[12]  Wen-Huei Jou,et al.  Finite volume calculation of three-dimensional potential flow around a propeller , 1983 .

[13]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Efficient hybrid scheme for the analysis of counter-rotating propellers , 1993 .

[14]  Andrea Arnone,et al.  Investigation of advanced counterrotation blade configuration concepts for high speed turboprop systems. Task 5: Unsteady counterrotation ducted propfan analysis. Computer program user's manual , 1993 .

[15]  T. A. Wynosky,et al.  Prop-Fan Performance Terminology , 1987 .

[16]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[17]  Mark L. Celestina,et al.  A Numerical Simulation of the Inviscid Flow Through a Counterrotating Propeller , 1986 .

[18]  Daniel J. Lesieutre,et al.  The Analysis of Counter-Rotating Propeller Systems , 1985 .

[19]  Arne Stürmer,et al.  Unsteady CFD Simulations of Contra-Rotating Propeller Propulsion Systems , 2008 .