Key issues in the microchemical systems-based methanol fuel processor : Energy density, thermal integration, and heat loss mechanisms

Abstract Microreactor technology is a promising approach in harnessing the high energy density of hydrocarbons and is being used to produce hydrogen-rich gases by reforming of methanol and other liquid hydrocarbons. However, on-demand H2 generation for miniature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) systems has been a bottleneck problem, which has limited the development and demonstration of the PEMFC for high-performance portable power. A number of crucial challenges exist for the realization of practical portable fuel processors. Among these, the management of heat in a compact format is perhaps the most crucial challenge for portable fuel processors. In this study, a silicon microreactor-based catalytic methanol steam reforming reactor was designed, fabricated, and demonstrated in the context of complete thermal integration to understand this critical issue and develop a knowledge base required to rationally design and integrate the microchemical components of a fuel processor. Detailed thermal and reaction experiments were carried out to demonstrate the potential of microreactor-based on-demand H2 generation. Based on thermal characterization experiments, the heat loss mechanisms and effective convective heat coefficients from the planar microreactor structure were determined and suggestions were made for scale up and implementation of packaging schemes to reduce different modes of heat losses.

[1]  Su Ha,et al.  Characterization of a high performing passive direct formic acid fuel cell , 2006 .

[2]  R. Schefer,et al.  Catalyzed combustion of H2/air mixtures in a flat plate boundary layer: II. Numerical model , 1982 .

[3]  Su Ha,et al.  A miniature air breathing direct formic acid fuel cell , 2004 .

[4]  Christopher K. Dyer Fuel cells for portable applications , 2002 .

[5]  Frédérick Mailly,et al.  Thermal model of thin film anemometer , 2002 .

[6]  J. C. Schouten,et al.  Experiments and modelling of an integrated preferential oxidation-heat exchanger microdevice , 2004 .

[7]  Dylan Mason,et al.  A light hydrocarbon fuel processor producing high-purity hydrogen , 2003 .

[8]  A. F. Mills Basic Heat and Mass Transfer , 1999 .

[9]  Evan O. Jones,et al.  Power generation using a mesoscale fuel cell integrated with a microscale fuel processor , 2004 .

[10]  Karl V. Kordesch,et al.  Fuel cells and their applications , 1996 .

[11]  D. Mears,et al.  Tests for Transport Limitations in Experimental Catalytic Reactors , 1971 .

[12]  P. Irving,et al.  Steam Reforming of Hydrocarbon Fuels , 2002 .

[13]  Chunshan Song,et al.  Fuel processing for low-temperature and high-temperature fuel cells , 2002 .

[14]  Wolfgang Ehrfeld,et al.  Microreactors: New Technology for Modern Chemistry , 2000 .

[15]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1986 .

[16]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  International activities in DMFC R&D: status of technologies and potential applications , 2004 .

[17]  R. S. Besser,et al.  Hydrocarbon hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions in microfabricated catalytic reactors , 2003 .

[18]  Guillermo Aguilar,et al.  Heat transfer dynamics during treatment of port wine stain birthmarks with multiple-intermittent cryogen spurts and laser pulses , 2005 .

[19]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[20]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  A microfabricated suspended-tube chemical reactor for thermally efficient fuel processing , 2003 .

[21]  W. Yoon,et al.  Development of a micro fuel processor for PEMFCs , 2004 .

[22]  Masayoshi Esashi,et al.  MEMS-based components of a miniature fuel cell/fuel reformer system , 2004 .

[23]  M. Kothare,et al.  A microreactor for hydrogen production in micro fuel cell applications , 2004, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[24]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Examination of External Mass Transport in a Microchannel Reactor by Pressure Variation , 2004 .

[25]  Robert F. Savinell,et al.  Kinetics of methanol-steam reformation in an internal reforming fuel cell , 2002 .

[26]  M. Au The hydrogen storage properties and the mechanism of the hydriding process of some multi-component magnesium-base hydrogen storage alloys , 1995 .

[27]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Development of a methanol fuelled reformer for fuel cell applications , 2003 .

[28]  Masatoshi Nomura,et al.  Development of multi-layered microreactor with methanol reformer for small PEMFC , 2005 .

[29]  A. S. Patil,et al.  Portable fuel cell systems for America’s army: technology transition to the field , 2004 .

[30]  Deep reactive ion etching characteristics of a macromachined chemical reactor , 2003 .

[31]  Marcel Liauw,et al.  Mass transfer limitations in microchannel reactors , 2005 .

[32]  Woo Y. Lee,et al.  Synthesis of Cellular Silica Structure Under Microchannel Confinement , 2007 .

[33]  A. Bejan,et al.  Heat transfer handbook , 2003 .

[34]  Panagiotis Tsiakaras,et al.  Recent progress in direct ethanol proton exchange membrane fuel cells (DE-PEMFCs) , 2006 .

[35]  Brant A. Peppley,et al.  Methanol–steam reforming on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3. Part 1: the reaction network , 1999 .

[36]  R. S. Besser,et al.  Microreaction for Microfuel Processing: Challenges and Prospects , 2005 .

[37]  S. Bhansali,et al.  Porous silicon based orientation independent, self-priming micro direct ethanol fuel cell , 2005 .

[38]  Akira Igarashi,et al.  A miniaturized methanol reformer with Si-based microreactor for a small PEMFC , 2006 .

[39]  R. S. Besser,et al.  Preferential oxidation (PrOx) in a thin-film catalytic microreactor: Advantages and limitations , 2005 .

[40]  P. Wild,et al.  CATALYTIC PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN FROM METHANOL , 2000 .

[41]  Woo Y. Lee,et al.  Surface-selective infiltration of thin-film catalyst into microchannel reactors , 2005 .