An experimental study on the objective measurement of accommodative amplitude under binocular and natural viewing conditions.

A high resolution optometer makes it possible to measure changes in refractive power objectively using reflected light from the fundus of the eye. There are limitations in that the subject has to see the target monocularly through a hole in the instrument. In the present study, we attempted to measure the accommodation and pupillary response with a newly developed device as a means to measure these factors in both binocular and natural viewing conditions. We compared the subjective accommodative amplitude levels obtained from the near-point distance with those of objective accommodative amplitude obtained in earlier studies using a monocular internal target. The amplitude of accommodation of the cases with binocular, natural viewing conditions was approximately 0.7 D larger than with monocular, internal target gazing. In previous studies, the difference between the subjective amplitude of accommodation and the results of the objective measurements, had been reported to be approximately 2 D, and was explained by the depth of focus. However, the difference between the subjective and objective amplitude of accommodation under binocular, natural viewing was smaller than that between the subjective and objective measurements (under monocular internal target gazing) from previous studies. This leads us to believe that besides the depth of the focus, we should consider the fact that the advantageous conditions inherent in binocular, natural viewing may increase the amplitude of accommodation. In the measurement of accommodative amplitude, the use of objective measuring methods are not affected by the subjects' subjective judgement.

[1]  Turner Mj Observations on the normal subjective amplitude of accommodation. , 1958 .

[2]  A Duane,et al.  Studies in Monocular and Binocular Accommodation, with Their Clinical Application. , 1922, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[3]  M J ALLEN,et al.  An objective high speed photographic technique for simultaneously recording changes in accommodation and convergence. , 1949, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  W N Charman,et al.  The path to presbyopia: straight or crooked? , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  Robert J. Lee,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF ACCOMMODATION. , 1895 .

[6]  DOUGLAS SHIRACHI,et al.  Dynamic Measures of Vergence Accommodation , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[7]  R C Fitch PROCEDURAL EFFECTS ON THE MANIFEST HUMAN AMPLITUDE OF ACCOMMODATION* , 1971, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  Jane F. Koretz,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye—aging of the anterior segment , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Bannon,et al.  The stigmatoscopy method of determining the binocular refractive status. , 1950, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  E MARG,et al.  The amplitude of accommodation in presbyopia. , 1956, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  J. Warshawsky,et al.  HIGH-RESOLUTION OPTOMETER FOR THE CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENT OF ACCOMMODATION. , 1964, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  Kazuhiko Ukai,et al.  A QUASI‐STATIC STUDY OF ACCOMMODATION IN AMBLYOPIA* , 1986, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  J. Robson,et al.  High-speed infrared optometer. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  Hofstetter Hw A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF AMPLITUDE CHANGES IN PRESBYOPIA. , 1965 .

[15]  L Stark,et al.  Triple-function ocular monitor. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  M Millodot,et al.  Presbyopia correction and the accommodation in reserve , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  Kazuhiko Ukai,et al.  Direct Recording of Accommodative Response versus Accomodative Stimulus , 1983 .

[18]  H Sakakibara,et al.  [The effect of VDT polarity and target size on pupil area]. , 1992, Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene.

[19]  L. Stark,et al.  Changes in Accommodation with Age: Static and Dynamic , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.