Toward an Epistemology of Engineering

What's Engineering Knowledge? How different is it from traditional Scientific Knowledge? How can we obtain reliable Engineering Knowledge? How can we assess the value of Engineering Knowledge? To help answer these questions and contribute to a reflection on the epistemology of engineering, we propose a model where engineering is seen as developing in four dimensions linked in a transdisciplinary relationship. We then articulate this model with the four key questions of the philosophy of knowledge, to clarify the nature of this relationship and illuminate some distinctive attributes of engineering knowledge.

[1]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[2]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[3]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[5]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[6]  A. Figueiredo,et al.  Action Research and Design in Information Systems: Two Faces of a Single Coin , 2006 .

[7]  Ned Kock.  Information Systems Action Research: An Applied View of Emerging Concepts and Methods (Integrated Series in Information Systems) , 2006 .

[8]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[9]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[10]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[11]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .

[12]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and foundations: an inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  N. Cross.  Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[14]  A. Parry.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[15]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .