Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups

This study examined the impact of members 'task-relevant status (i.e., prior task experience) on the bias in decision-making groups to discuss more common (shared) than unique (unshared) information. Subjects reviewed applications for an assistant professor position and, in mixed-sex groups (two femake and two male), chose between two candidates. Either female or male members had prior experience with a similar task Experienced members (regardless of gender) were less predisposed to favor shared information in the mentioning and repetition of information. Consistent with expectation states theory, member gender (a diffuse status cue) failed to qualify task-relevant status effects. Although experienced members were not more successful than inexperienced members at persuading the group to adopt their preference, when they did win, they did so with less effort. Suggestions are offered for using status processes to understand the psychological factors affecting collective information sampling.

[1]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Are Gender Differences Status Differences , 1992 .

[2]  E P HOLLANDER,et al.  Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. , 1958, Psychological review.

[3]  J. Kelly,et al.  Gender and Sex Role Differences in Group Decision‐Making Social Interactions: A Behavioral Analysis1 , 1982 .

[4]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[5]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[6]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis. , 1983 .

[7]  Erich Kirchler,et al.  The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change , 1986 .

[8]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  INTERRUPTIONS IN GROUP DISCUSSIONS: THE EFFECTS OF GENDER AND GROUP COMPOSITION* , 1989 .

[9]  M. D. Pugh,et al.  Neutralizing Sexism in Mixed-Sex Groups: Do Women Have to Be Better Than Men? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[11]  David G. Wagner,et al.  Can gender inequalities be reduced , 1986 .

[12]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[13]  J. Piliavin,et al.  The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction , 1978 .

[14]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles , 1984 .

[16]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[17]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[18]  C. Keating,et al.  Power Displays Between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study , 1988 .

[19]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups : Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams , 1996 .

[20]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[21]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[22]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .