Extensive and Intensive Investment over the Business Cycle

Investment of US firms responds asymmetrically to Tobin’s Q: investment of established firms—“intensive” investment—reacts negatively to Q whereas investment of new firms—“extensive” investment—responds positively and elastically to Q. This asymmetry, we argue, reflects a difference between established and new firms in the cost of adopting new technologies. A fall in the compatibility of new capital with old capital raises measured Q and reduces the incentive of established firms to invest. New firms do not face such compatibility costs and step up their investment in response to the rise in Q.

[1]  R. Hall.  The Stock Market and Capital Accumulation , 1999 .

[2]  Giorgio E. Primiceri,et al.  The Time Varying Volatility of Macroeconomic Fluctuations , 2006 .

[3]  R. Hall.  Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Balázs Szentes,et al.  On the Market for Venture Capital , 2013, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  R. Webb,et al.  The National Income and Product Accounts , 2012 .

[6]  Varadarajan V. Chari,et al.  Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Edward C. Prescott,et al.  Dynamic Coalitions: Engines of Growth , 1987 .

[8]  R. Barro.  Rare Disasters and Asset Markets in the Twentieth Century , 2006 .

[9]  Per Krusell,et al.  Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change , 1995 .

[10]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[11]  Robert E. Gallman,et al.  Productivity Trends in the United States. , 1962 .

[12]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[13]  P. Hall,et al.  Estimating a tail exponent by modelling departure from a Pareto distribution , 1999 .

[14]  Toni M. Whited,et al.  TWO-STEP GMM ESTIMATION OF THE ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES MODEL USING HIGH-ORDER MOMENTS , 2002, Econometric Theory.

[15]  Jeffrey Wurgler,et al.  When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms , 2001 .

[16]  Apostolos Serletis,et al.  Productivity trends in the United States , 2006 .

[17]  S. Baier,et al.  Income and Education of the States of the United States: 1840-2000 , 2004 .

[18]  Andrew B. Bernard,et al.  Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching , 2010 .

[19]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Making sense of corporate venture capital. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[20]  R. Hall.  E-Capital: The Link between the Stock Market and the Labor Market in the 1990s , 2000 .

[21]  Spinoffs and the Market for Ideas , 2007 .

[22]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Why Wait? a Century of Life Before IPO , 2001 .

[23]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Vintage Organization Capital , 2001 .

[24]  April M. Franco,et al.  Knowledge Diffusion through Employee Mobility , 2000 .

[25]  Giorgio E. Primiceri,et al.  Investment Shocks and the Relative Price of Investment , 2009 .

[26]  Jeffrey R. Campbell.  Entry, Exit, Embodied Technology, and Business Cycles , 1998 .

[27]  E. Prescott.  Comments on the current state of the theory of aggregate investment behavior , 1980 .

[28]  John W. Kendrick,et al.  Productivity Trends in the United States. , 1962 .

[29]  Thomas J. Prusa,et al.  Can Companies Maintain Their Initial Innovation Thrust? A Study of the PC Software Industry , 1994 .

[30]  R. Nelson,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers and Inequality , 2002 .

[31]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation , 2000 .

[32]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Today's Edisons or Weekend Hobbyists: Technical Merit and Success of Inventions by Independent Inventors , 2004 .

[33]  Janice C. Eberly,et al.  How Q and Cash Flow Affect Investment without Frictions: An Analytic Explanation , 2011 .

[34]  Thomas J. Chemmanur,et al.  The Going Public Decision and the Product Market , 2008 .

[35]  Evelina M. Tainer.  National Income and Product Accounts , 2012 .

[36]  Richard Rogerson,et al.  Family labor supply and aggregate fluctuations , 1988 .

[37]  Edward C. Prescott,et al.  Hours and employment variation in business cycle theory , 1991 .

[38]  Cliff T. Bekar,et al.  General purpose technologies , 2013 .

[39]  Alan L. Olmstead,et al.  Historical Statistics of the United States , 2006 .

[40]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Intra-Industry Spinoffs , 2006 .

[41]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[42]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  The Relation between Firm Growth and Q with Multiple Capital Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms , 1990 .

[43]  Toni M. Whited,et al.  Treating Measurement Error in Tobin’s Q , 2011 .

[44]  Florin O. Bilbiie,et al.  Endogenous Entry, Product Variety, and Business Cycles , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[45]  Thomas F. Cooley,et al.  Employment and hours over the business cycle , 1994 .

[46]  V. Ivashina,et al.  Cyclicality of Credit Supply: Firm Level Evidence , 2011 .

[47]  M. Yorukoglu,et al.  The Information Technology Productivity Paradox , 1998 .

[48]  L. Ohanian,et al.  Are data on industry evolution and gross job turnover relevant for macroeconomics , 1996 .

[49]  Erzo G. J. Luttmer.  Selection, Growth, and the Size Distribution of Firms , 2007 .

[50]  Paul A. Gompers.  Corporations and the Financing of Innovation: The Corporate Venturing Experience , 2002 .

[51]  R. Lucas.  ASSET PRICES IN AN EXCHANGE ECONOMY , 1978 .

[52]  Timothy Erickson,et al.  Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and q , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[53]  A. Stinchcombe,et al.  Demography of Organizations , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Z. Shapira,et al.  Entrepreneurial Finance Meet Corporate Reality: Comparing Investment Practices by Corporate and Independent Venture Capitalists , 2007 .

[55]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Learning By Doing and the Choice of Technology , 1994 .

[56]  Huntley Schaller,et al.  Why does liquidity matter in investment equations , 1995 .

[57]  P. M. Shearer,et al.  Zipf Distribution of U . S . Firm Sizes , 2022 .

[58]  Paul A. Gompers.  The Rise and Fall of Venture Capital , 1994 .

[59]  S. Wright,et al.  Measures of Stock Market Value and Returns for the U.S. Nonfinancial Corporate Sector, 1900-2002 , 2002 .

[60]  Benjamin N. Grosof,et al.  Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows , 2003 .

[61]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  TOBIN'S MARGINAL q AND AVERAGE q: A NEOCLASSICAL INTERPRETATION , 1982 .

[62]  Per Krusell,et al.  The Role of Investment-Specific Technological Change in the Business Cycle , 2000 .

[63]  David Martimort,et al.  The Life Cycle of Regulatory Agencies: Dynamic Capture and Transaction Costs , 1999 .

[64]  C. Shapiro,et al.  A Theory of Factor Mobility , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[65]  Neng Wang,et al.  Valuing Private Equity , 2013 .

[66]  Dimitris Papanikolaou,et al.  Investment Shocks and Asset Prices , 2011, Journal of Political Economy.

[67]  Ufuk Akcigit,et al.  Innovation, Reallocation and Growth , 2013, American Economic Review.

[68]  Thomas J. Sargent,et al.  "Tobin's q" and the rate of investment in general equilibrium , 1979 .

[69]  Simon Gilchrist,et al.  Putty‐Clay and Investment: A Business Cycle Analysis , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[70]  Thomas J. Prusa,et al.  Are new firms an important source of innovation?: Evidence from the PC software industry , 1991 .

[71]  J. Cogan.  Fixed Costs and Labor Supply , 1980 .

[72]  Jonas D. M. Fisher.  The Dynamic Effects of Neutral and Investment‐Specific Technology Shocks , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.