CRISPR-Cas-amplified urine biomarkers for multiplexed and portable cancer diagnostics

Synthetic biomarkers, exogenous probes that generate molecular reporters, represent an emerging paradigm in precision diagnostics with applications across infectious and noncommunicable diseases. These methods use multiplexing strategies to provide tools that are both sensitive and specific. However, the field of synthetic biomarkers has not benefited from molecular strategies such as DNA-barcoding due to the susceptibility of nucleic acids in vivo. Herein, we exploit chemically-stabilized DNAs to tag synthetic biomarkers and produce diagnostic signals via CRISPR nucleases. Our strategy capitalizes on disease-associated, protease-activated release of nucleic acid barcodes and polymerase-amplification-free, CRISPR-Cas-mediated barcode detection in unprocessed biofluids. In murine cancer models, we show that these DNA-encoded nanosensors can noninvasively detect and monitor disease progression, and demonstrate that nuclease amplification can be harnessed to convert the readout to a point-of-care tool. This technique combines specificity with ease of use to offer a new platform to study human disease and guide therapeutic decisions.

[1]  Jacqueline A. Valeri,et al.  A CRISPR-based assay for the detection of opportunistic infections post-transplantation and for the monitoring of transplant rejection , 2020, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Steven A. Carr,et al.  The Matrisome: In Silico Definition and In Vivo Characterization by Proteomics of Normal and Tumor Extracellular Matrices , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  Eric T. Wang,et al.  Barcoded nanoparticles for high throughput in vivo discovery of targeted therapeutics , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes , 2018, Science.

[5]  T. Jacks,et al.  Urinary detection of lung cancer in mice via noninvasive pulmonary protease profiling , 2020, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  Site-specific labeling of cysteine-tagged camelid single-domain antibody-fragments for use in molecular imaging. , 2014, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[7]  A. Norman,et al.  Selective disulfide reduction for labeling and enhancement of Fab antibody fragments. , 2016, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  T. Antalis,et al.  Membrane-Anchored Serine Proteases and Protease-Activated Receptor-2-Mediated Signaling: Co-Conspirators in Cancer Progression. , 2019, Cancer research.

[9]  Christopher E. Hart,et al.  Chemical modification of PS-ASO therapeutics reduces cellular protein-binding and improves the therapeutic index , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Jinkuk Kim,et al.  Patient-Customized Oligonucleotide Therapy for a Rare Genetic Disease. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  James J. Collins,et al.  Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6 , 2018, Science.

[12]  Chris Morrison Nanobody approval gives domain antibodies a boost , 2019, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  Barry A Badeau,et al.  Engineered modular biomaterial logic gates for environmentally triggered therapeutic delivery , 2017, Nature chemistry.

[14]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Classification of prostate cancer using a protease activity nanosensor library , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[16]  Amin Aalipour,et al.  Engineered immune cells as highly sensitive cancer diagnostics , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini,et al.  TGFβ drives immune evasion in genetically reconstituted colon cancer metastasis , 2018, Nature.

[18]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Targeting kidney mesangium by nanoparticles of defined size , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  H. Nielsen,et al.  Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer , 2019, Nature.

[20]  Kevin M. Koo,et al.  Merging new-age biomarkers and nanodiagnostics for precision prostate cancer management , 2019, Nature Reviews Urology.

[21]  anastasia. khvorova,et al.  The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  A. J. Bennet,et al.  A mechanism-based inactivator of glycoside hydrolases involving formation of a transient non-classical carbocation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[23]  D. Quail,et al.  Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis , 2014 .

[24]  R. Barker,et al.  Targeting Huntingtin Expression in Patients with Huntington's Disease. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  O. Abudayyeh,et al.  Mass-encoded synthetic biomarkers for multiplexed urinary monitoring of disease , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Mathematical Model Identifies Blood Biomarker–Based Early Cancer Detection Strategies and Limitations , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[27]  James J. Collins,et al.  Programmable CRISPR-responsive smart materials , 2019, Science.

[28]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter Mitral‐Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  P. De Baetselier,et al.  Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor promotes the tumorigenic and metastatic potential of cancer cells , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity , 2018, Science.

[31]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Cancer Cell Profiling by Barcoding Allows Multiplexed Protein Analysis in Fine-Needle Aspirates , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[32]  Sharon S. Hori,et al.  Detecting cancers through tumor-activatable minicircles that lead to a detectable blood biomarker , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. I. Smith,et al.  Therapeutic Oligonucleotides: State of the Art. , 2019, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[34]  Peiyong Jiang,et al.  Orientation-aware plasma cell-free DNA fragmentation analysis in open chromatin regions informs tissue of origin , 2019, Genome research.

[35]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Programmable probiotics for detection of cancer in urine , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[36]  Hayden C. Metsky,et al.  Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13 , 2018, Science.

[37]  N. Hynes,et al.  The serine protease inhibitor protease nexin-1 controls mammary cancer metastasis through LRP-1-mediated MMP-9 expression. , 2009, Cancer research.

[38]  Darren J. Burgess,et al.  Spatial transcriptomics coming of age , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Alexandra Naba,et al.  Overview of the matrisome--an inventory of extracellular matrix constituents and functions. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[40]  Matthew W. Snyder,et al.  Cell-free DNA Comprises an In Vivo Nucleosome Footprint that Informs Its Tissues-Of-Origin , 2016, Cell.

[41]  C. Stein,et al.  FDA-Approved Oligonucleotide Therapies in 2017. , 2017, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[42]  Serge Muyldermans,et al.  Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[43]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2 , 2017, Science.

[44]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Integrating genomic features for non-invasive early lung cancer detection , 2020, Nature.

[45]  Benjamin L. Oakes,et al.  CRISPR-CasX is an RNA-dominated enzyme active for human genome editing , 2019, Nature.

[46]  David Fenyö,et al.  A robust pipeline for rapid production of versatile nanobody repertoires , 2014, Nature Methods.