The comparison of airborne laser scanning-based probability layers as auxiliary information for assessing coarse woody debris

During the past 15 years the assessment of biodiversity has become increasingly important in forestry. Dead wood (coarse woody debris, CWD) has been recognized as one of the strongest indicators of forest biodiversity, and therefore, much attention has been paid to CWD assessment. This study investigated whether airborne laser scanning (ALS)-based auxiliary information gathered from an independent study area is useful in guiding the sample-based field inventory of CWD. The auxiliary information was used in the design phase by implementing probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling with fixed-sized plots and initial sample units in adaptive cluster sampling (ACS). Furthermore, auxiliary information was used in the estimation phase in the form of ratio and regression estimations. ALS-based metrics and a logistic regression model were used in producing probability layers utilized as auxiliary data values. The sampling methods were compared based on the accuracy of mean volume (m3 ha−1) estimates for CWD with fixed input effort specified as field working hours. When ratio and regression estimation was used with fixed-sized plots, the increase in sampling efficiency was 4.6% and 6.0%, respectively. The use of auxiliary information in the design phase improved the efficiency considerably; the efficiency of ACS improved by 12.0% whereas the inventory of fixed-sized plots was as much as 16.7% more efficient when ALS data were used.

[1]  H. Salminen,et al.  Evaluating estimation methods for logistic regression in modelling individual-tree mortality , 2003 .

[2]  T. Kuuluvainen.  Gap disturbance, ground microtopography, and the regeneration dynamics of boreal coniferous forests in Filand: a review , 1994 .

[3]  J. Holmgrena,et al.  Large Scale Airborne Laser Scanning of Forest Resources in Sweden , 2004 .

[4]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity , 1989 .

[5]  I. Korpela,et al.  Appraisal of seedling stand vegetation with airborne imagery and discrete-return LiDAR : an exploratory analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Martin C.D. Speight,et al.  Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation , 1989 .

[7]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Comparison of field sampling methods for assessing coarse woody debris and use of airborne laser scanning as auxiliary information , 2009 .

[8]  Petteri Packalen,et al.  Airborne laser scanning-based prediction of coarse woody debris volumes in a conservation area , 2008 .

[9]  Timothy G. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Methods for Multiresource Forest Inventory , 1993 .

[10]  R. Meech,et al.  An introduction to generalized linear models , 1990 .

[11]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Lahopuuinventoinnin menetelmien vertailu Nuuksion ulkoilualueilla , 1970 .

[12]  G. Seber,et al.  Adaptive Cluster Sampling , 2012 .

[13]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Combining ALS and NFI training data for forest management planning: a case study in Kuortane, Western Finland , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[14]  Jouko Laasasenaho.  Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch [Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Betula pubescens] , 1982 .

[15]  J. Siitonen,et al.  Significance of woodland key habitats for polypore diversity and red-listed species in boreal forests , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[16]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[17]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[18]  P. G. D. Vries,et al.  Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory , 1986, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  G. Ståhl,et al.  Unrestricted guided transect sampling for surveying sparse species , 2007 .

[20]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Transect relascope sampling for assessing coarse woody debris: The case of a π/2 relascope angle , 1997 .

[21]  E. Næsset.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[22]  T. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Natural Resources and the Environment , 2004 .

[23]  E. Næsset.  Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia , 2007 .

[24]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Towards a universal lidar canopy height indicator , 2006 .

[25]  David R. Smith,et al.  Efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling for estimating density of wintering waterfowl , 1995 .

[26]  Francis A. Roesch.  Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Forest Inventories , 1993, Forest Science.

[27]  T. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Amount and diversity of coarse woody debris within a boreal forest landscape dominated by Pinus sylvestris in Vienansalo wilderness, eastern Fennoscandia , 2002 .

[28]  P. Axelsson.  DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[29]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of stem volume using airborne laser scanning, aerial photography, and stand-register data , 2006 .

[30]  M. H. Hansen,et al.  On the Theory of Sampling from Finite Populations , 1943 .

[31]  E. Næsset.  Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[32]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 1995 .

[33]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .