THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF VECTORCARDIOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS.

Abstract The simultaneously recorded QRS complexes of the scalar leads of three orthogonal vectorcardiographic systems (SVEC-III, Frank, and axial) have been converted to digital form and examined by means of computer analysis for the characteristics of transformation between any two systems in 35 normal subjects. A set of individual transformation coefficients fitted by the method of least-squares for the entire phase of ventricular depolarization in each subject was obtained, so that when applied to the voltages of one lead system, the configurations of the QRS complex in the leads of the other system could be closely approximated. There was, however, considerable variation within the group, so that average transformation coefficients for the normal subjects sometimes gave very poor approximations of the desired set of scalar leads and vector loops from a given set. An attempt was made to determine whether this variation in transformation characteristics depended upon certain physical parameters, such as height, weight, age, body surface area, relative obesity, or orientation of the mean spatial electrical axis of the QRS. Mild trends were noted toward relating the components of Z in the Frank-to-axial transformation to body weight, and of the components of Z in the axial-to-SVEC-III transformation to the orientation of the mean spatial axis of the axial vectorcardiogram; otherwise, the variation in transformation coefficients appeared to be random. Our tentative conclusion is that, although interesting approximations can be obtained in the laboratory from the knowledge of average transformation coefficients, the practical interchangeability of quantitative information obtained from one lead system into that obtainable by another is seriously limited because of the wide range of biologic variation in transformation characteristics.

[1]  D A BRODY,et al.  An Official Journal of the American Heart Association Body Surface Potential Distribution : COMPARISON OF NATURALLY AND ARTIFICIALLY PRODUCED SIGNALS AS ANALYZED BY DIGITAL COMPUTER , 2005 .

[2]  H. C. Burger,et al.  Compromise in vectorcardiography. II. Alterations of coefficients as a means of adapting one lead system to another. Subjective and mathematical comparison of four systems of VCG. , 1962, American heart journal.

[3]  E. Frank An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956, Circulation.

[4]  THE LIMITS OF INFORMATION IN THE VECTORCARDIOGRAM: COMPARATIVE RESYNTHESIS OF BODY SURFACE POTENTIALS WITH DIFFERENT LEAD SYSTEMS. , 1964, American heart journal.

[5]  N. Makous,et al.  Hemodynamics of the Master Two‐Step Test in Hypertension and Healed Myocardial Infarction , 1964, Circulation.

[6]  L. Horan,et al.  Relationship Between the Anatomical Orientation of the Interventricular Septum and the Manifest Orientation of Ventricular Depolarization in Dogs , 1962, Circulation research.

[7]  R. P. Grant,et al.  The Relationship between the Anatomic Position of the Heart and the Electrocardiogram: A Criticism of "Unipolar" Electrocardiography , 1953, Circulation.

[8]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND VECTORCARDIOGRAPHY: The Present Status of Vectorcardiography , 1955 .

[9]  Daniel A. Brody,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Several Corrected Vectorcardiographic Leads , 1964, Circulation.

[10]  W. Guntheroth,et al.  Relationship between the Electrocardiogram and the Position of the Heart as Determined by Biplane Angiocardiography , 1961, Circulation.

[11]  B. Taccardi,et al.  Distribution of Heart Potentials on the Thoracic Surface of Normal Human Subjects , 1963, Circulation research.

[12]  R. McFee,et al.  An orthogonal lead system for clinical electrocardiography , 1961 .

[13]  D A BRODY,et al.  Principal Factor Waveforms of the Thoracic QRS Complex , 1964, Circulation research.