Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development

Significance We do not know how and why belowground biodiversity may change as soils develop over centuries to millennia, hampering our ability to predict the myriad of ecosystem processes regulated by belowground organisms under changing environments. We conducted a global survey of 16 soil chronosequences spanning a wide range of ecosystem types and found that in less productive ecosystems, increases in belowground biodiversity followed increases in plant cover, but in more productive ecosystems, acidification during soil development was often associated with declines in belowground biodiversity. The biodiversity of multiple soil organisms exhibited similar patterns over time, but in contrast to expectations, changes in plant diversity were not associated with corresponding changes in belowground biodiversity. Belowground organisms play critical roles in maintaining multiple ecosystem processes, including plant productivity, decomposition, and nutrient cycling. Despite their importance, however, we have a limited understanding of how and why belowground biodiversity (bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates) may change as soils develop over centuries to millennia (pedogenesis). Moreover, it is unclear whether belowground biodiversity changes during pedogenesis are similar to the patterns observed for aboveground plant diversity. Here we evaluated the roles of resource availability, nutrient stoichiometry, and soil abiotic factors in driving belowground biodiversity across 16 soil chronosequences (from centuries to millennia) spanning a wide range of globally distributed ecosystem types. Changes in belowground biodiversity during pedogenesis followed two main patterns. In lower-productivity ecosystems (i.e., drier and colder), increases in belowground biodiversity tracked increases in plant cover. In more productive ecosystems (i.e., wetter and warmer), increased acidification during pedogenesis was associated with declines in belowground biodiversity. Changes in the diversity of bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates with pedogenesis were strongly and positively correlated worldwide, highlighting that belowground biodiversity shares similar ecological drivers as soils and ecosystems develop. In general, temporal changes in aboveground plant diversity and belowground biodiversity were not correlated, challenging the common perception that belowground biodiversity should follow similar patterns to those of plant diversity during ecosystem development. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that ecological patterns in belowground biodiversity are predictable across major globally distributed ecosystem types and suggest that shifts in plant cover and soil acidification during ecosystem development are associated with changes in belowground biodiversity over centuries to millennia.

[1]  M. Bahram,et al.  Fungal Biogeography , 2021, Biogeography.

[2]  N. Fierer,et al.  Unraveling the effects of spatial variability and relic DNA on the temporal dynamics of soil microbial communities , 2018, bioRxiv.

[3]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Plant attributes explain the distribution of soil microbial communities in two contrasting regions of the globe. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[4]  J. Stegen,et al.  Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[5]  R. Ortiz-Álvarez,et al.  Consistent changes in the taxonomic structure and functional attributes of bacterial communities during primary succession , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[6]  N. Fierer,et al.  A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil , 2018, Science.

[7]  P. Marquet,et al.  Microbial communities in soil chronosequences with distinct parent material: the effect of soil pH and litter quality , 2017 .

[8]  F. Maestre,et al.  Soil microbial communities drive the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to global change in drylands across the globe. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[9]  N. Fierer Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[10]  S. Sørensen,et al.  It is elemental: soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity , 2017, Environmental microbiology.

[11]  M. Schloter,et al.  Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality , 2016, Nature.

[12]  M. Hijri,et al.  High richness of ectomycorrhizal fungi and low host specificity in a coastal sand dune ecosystem revealed by network analysis , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[13]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  F. Maestre,et al.  Differences in thallus chemistry are related to species-specific effects of biocrust-forming lichens on soil nutrients and microbial communities , 2015 .

[15]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Global diversity and geography of soil fungi , 2014, Science.

[16]  Richard D. Bardgett,et al.  Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2014, Nature.

[17]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Environmental filtering explains variation in plant diversity along resource gradients , 2014, Science.

[18]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads , 2013, Nature Methods.

[20]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  How does pedogenesis drive plant diversity? , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Progressive and retrogressive ecosystem development coincide with soil bacterial community change in a dune system under lowland temperate rainforest in New Zealand , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[22]  Xuewen Huang,et al.  Plant Species Richness and Ecosystem Multifunctionality in Global Drylands , 2012, Science.

[23]  H. Jenny Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology , 2011 .

[24]  Edward Ayres,et al.  Molecular study of worldwide distribution and diversity of soil animals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  Stephen Porder,et al.  Understanding ecosystem retrogression , 2010 .

[27]  F. Gillet,et al.  Community development along a proglacial chronosequence: are above‐ground and below‐ground community structure controlled more by biotic than abiotic factors? , 2010 .

[28]  D. Wardle,et al.  The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development , 2010 .

[29]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[30]  Stephen Porder,et al.  Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  D. Wardle,et al.  Among- and within-species variation in plant litter decomposition in contrasting long-term chronosequences , 2009 .

[32]  W. Whitman,et al.  Microbial community succession and bacterial diversity in soils during 77,000 years of ecosystem development. , 2008, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[33]  D. Wardle,et al.  The response of plant diversity to ecosystem retrogression: evidence from contrasting long‐term chronosequences , 2008 .

[34]  Robert Andersen Modern Methods for Robust Regression , 2007 .

[35]  D. Tilman,et al.  Resource availability controls fungal diversity across a plant diversity gradient. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  W. Putten,et al.  Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. , 2005 .

[38]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Nutrient Cycling and Limitation: Hawai'i as a Model System , 2004 .

[39]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Ecosystem Properties and Forest Decline in Contrasting Long-Term Chronosequences , 2004, Science.

[40]  D. Wardle,et al.  Ecological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota , 2004, Science.

[41]  M. Torn,et al.  Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils , 2001, Plant and Soil.

[42]  John W. Doran,et al.  Simplified Method for Soil Particle-Size Determination to Accompany Soil-Quality Analyses , 2001 .

[43]  P. Vitousek,et al.  NUTRIENT LIMITATION OF DECOMPOSITION IN HAWAIIAN FORESTS , 2000 .

[44]  Comparison of tree basal area and canopy cover in habitat models : Subalpine forest , 1997 .

[45]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii. , 1995 .

[46]  E. Paul,et al.  Soil microbiology and biochemistry. , 1998 .

[47]  A. Page Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. , 1982 .

[48]  W. McGill,et al.  Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter , 1981 .

[49]  J. Syers,et al.  The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis , 1976 .

[50]  H. Jenny Factors of Soil Formation , 1941 .