Development of Automatic Visceral Fat Volume Calculation Software for CT Volume Data

Objective. To develop automatic visceral fat volume calculation software for computed tomography (CT) volume data and to evaluate its feasibility. Methods. A total of 24 sets of whole-body CT volume data and anthropometric measurements were obtained, with three sets for each of four BMI categories (under 20, 20 to 25, 25 to 30, and over 30) in both sexes. True visceral fat volumes were defined on the basis of manual segmentation of the whole-body CT volume data by an experienced radiologist. Software to automatically calculate visceral fat volumes was developed using a region segmentation technique based on morphological analysis with CT value threshold. Automatically calculated visceral fat volumes were evaluated in terms of the correlation coefficient with the true volumes and the error relative to the true volume. Results. Automatic visceral fat volume calculation results of all 24 data sets were obtained successfully and the average calculation time was 252.7 seconds/case. The correlation coefficients between the true visceral fat volume and the automatically calculated visceral fat volume were over 0.999. Conclusions. The newly developed software is feasible for calculating visceral fat volumes in a reasonable time and was proved to have high accuracy.

[1]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  N. Unwin,et al.  Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National , 2009 .

[3]  R. Ross,et al.  Body mass index and waist circumference independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  S. Yamashita,et al.  Abdominal fat: standardized technique for measurement at CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  Leonard H. Epstein,et al.  Overweight, obesity, and health risk. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  M. Yoshiyama,et al.  MR measurement of visceral fat: assessment of metabolic syndrome. , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[7]  Yoshitaka Masutani,et al.  CIRCUS: an MDA Platform for Clinical Image Analysis in Hospitals , 2010, Trans. Mass Data Anal. Images Signals.

[8]  P-W Lin,et al.  Fully automated large-scale assessment of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, International Journal of Obesity.

[9]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Automated Quantification of Body Fat Distribution on Volumetric Computed Tomography , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Luigi Landini,et al.  An accurate and robust method for unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Waist Circumference Correlates with Metabolic Syndrome Indicators Better Than Percentage Fat , 2006, Obesity.

[12]  Charles F Burant,et al.  The rapidly expanding family of adipokines. , 2007, Cell metabolism.

[13]  Yoshitaka Masutani RBF-Based Representation of Volumetric Data: Application in Visualization and Segmentation , 2002, MICCAI.

[14]  S. Yamashita,et al.  Enhanced expression of PAI–1 in visceral fat: Possible contributor to vascular disease in obeisty , 1996, Nature Medicine.