Rationale for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Study Design. A questionnaire survey. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of patient age, dynamic instability, and/or low back pain on the treatment of patients with a degenerative spondylolisthesis, and if the operative approach is affected by surgeon specialty, location, or practice model. Summary of Background Data. The classic treatment for patients with symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis is decompression and fusion; however in a select group of patients, an isolated decompression may be reasonable. Methods. A survey was sent to surgeon members of the Lumbar Spine Research Society and AOSpine requesting information regarding their preferred treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis for a number of different clinical scenarios. Determinants included patient age, the presence of instability, symptoms of low back pain, surgeon's location, surgeon's specialty, and practice model. Results. A total of 223 spine surgeons completed the survey. Age of the patient, the presence of instability, and low back pain all significantly (P < 0.0001) affected the recommended treatment, which were independent of surgeon factors. Older patients were significantly less likely to be offered an interbody fusion and more likely to be recommended for an isolated decompression (P < 0.0001), and the presence of dynamic instability made an interbody fusion more likely than an isolated decompression (P < 0.0001). Of those who responded, 53.2% of surgeons reported they would recommend an isolated decompression for a properly selected patient with a degenerative spondylolisthesis. Conclusion. The most common operative treatment for a degenerative spondylolisthesis is a decompression and fusion; however, the results of this survey demonstrate that surgeons consider degenerative spondylolisthesis a heterogeneous condition that requires an individualized surgical plan. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effect of variables such as age, the presence of low back pain, and the presence of dynamic instability on patient reported outcomes from various surgical options. Level of Evidence: N/A.

[1]  T. Albert,et al.  Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  T. Albert,et al.  National Trends in the Use of Fusion Techniques to Treat Degenerative Spondylolisthesis , 2014, Spine.

[3]  A. Bydon,et al.  Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonoperative Management for Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[4]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Predominant Leg Pain Is Associated With Better Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis: Results From the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) , 2011, Spine.

[5]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Success and Failure of Minimally Invasive Decompression for Focal Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With and Without Deformity , 2010, Spine.

[6]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Four-Year Results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial , 2010, Spine.

[7]  James N Weinstein,et al.  Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  R. Collins,et al.  Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  K. Malloy,et al.  A Critical Analysis of the Literature Regarding Surgical Approach and Outcome for Adult Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  J. Fischgrund,et al.  Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Long-Term Study Comparing Fusion and Pseudarthrosis , 2004, Spine.

[11]  R A Deyo,et al.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. , 2000, Spine.

[12]  H N Herkowitz,et al.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  T. Sakou,et al.  Natural History of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Pathogenesis and Natural Course of the Slippage , 1990, Spine.

[14]  T. Sakou,et al.  Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. , 1990 .

[15]  L. Herron,et al.  L4-5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The Results of Treatment by Decompressive Laminectomy without Fusion , 1989, Spine.

[16]  I. Macnab,et al.  Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  A. Colak,et al.  Surgical results of degenerative spondylolisthesis patients over 70 years old: a single-center experience and clinical outcomes. , 2012, Turkish neurosurgery.

[18]  J. Weinstein Where is the wisdom in healthcare?: the "wizard of oz": heart, brain, and courage. , 2010, Spine.