Combining mediated social touch with vision : from self-attribution to telepresence?

Combining mediated social touch (i.e., interpersonal touch over a distance by means of a tactile display) with vision allows people to both see and feel their remote interaction partner’s touches. This is expected to increase the user’s sense of telepresence (i.e., the experience of "being there" in the same environment as one’s remote interaction partner), thereby perhaps providing part of the imediacy that marks natural unmediated physical contact. Such a possible effect of combining touch with vision is expected to depend partly on the central nervous system’s ability to categorize tools and technological artifacts as an actual part of one’s body. Since such so-called self-attribution is facilitated by a morphological congruence between the artifact and the human body, we anticipated that the effect of combining touch with vision would be larger when people could see the mediated touches being performed on a morphologically congruent as compared to an incongruent input medium. In our experiment, we compared two input media: a sensor-equipped mannequin that enabled a one-to-one mapping between seen and felt touch, and a morphologically incongruent touch screen that displayed a set of buttons. When participants saw the touches being initiated on the morphologically congruent mannequin input medium, they, as expected, reported a higher sense of telepresence. In addition, they perceived of the mediated touches as more touchlike with the mannequin as compared to the touch screen input medium. These findings illustrate that visual feedback, especially when morphologically correct, can improve mediated social touch. Our experiment, however, suggests that other mechanisms than self-attribution might be involved.

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  The science of interpersonal touch: An overview , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  W. IJsselsteijn,et al.  The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. , 2008, Body image.

[3]  W. IJsselsteijn Towards a neuropsychological basis of presence , 2005 .

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality , 1996 .

[6]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  Self-attribution and telepresence , 2007 .

[7]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Do it yourself haptics: part I , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[8]  A. F. Rovers,et al.  Guidelines for haptic interpersonal communication applications: an exploration of foot interaction styles , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[9]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: a first test , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  H. Ehrsson The Experimental Induction of Out-of-Body Experiences , 2007, Science.

[12]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Telepresence, time delay and adaptation , 1991 .

[14]  T. Metzinger,et al.  Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness , 2007, Science.

[15]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual distortion of a limb modulates the pain and swelling evoked by movement , 2008, Current Biology.

[16]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Distal Attribution and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D. Bischof-Köhler,et al.  Infant Development: Perspectives from German Speaking Countries , 1991 .

[19]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[20]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  I'm always touched by your presence, dear : combining mediated social touch with morphologically correct visual feedback , 2009 .

[21]  P. Haggard Just seeing you makes me feel better: Interpersonal enhancement of touch , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[22]  P. Haggard,et al.  Shared representations in body perception. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Force-Feedback in computer-mediated communication , 2001, HCI.

[24]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[25]  Scott Brave,et al.  inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  P. Haggard,et al.  Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans , 2001, Current Biology.