Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning

There are many design challenges that must be addressed in the development of collaborative scientific discovery learning environments. This contribution presents an overview of how these challenges were addressed within Co-Lab, a collaborative learning environment in which groups of learners can experiment through simulations and remote laboratories, and express acquired understanding in a runnable computer model. Co-Lab's architecture is introduced and explicated from the perspective of addressing typical problem areas for students within collaborative discovery learning. From this view the processes of collaboration, inquiry, and modeling are presented with a description of how they have been supported in the past and how they are supported within Co-Lab's design and tools. Finally, a research agenda is proposed for collaborative discovery learning with the Co-Lab environment.

[1]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  What Scientific Thinking Reveals About the Nature of Cognition , 2000 .

[2]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  A qualitative modeling environment for middle-school students: A progress report , 2001 .

[3]  D. Penner.  Cognition, Computers, and Synthetic Science: Building Knowledge and Meaning Through Modeling , 2000 .

[4]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[5]  Stephanie D. Teasley.  The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. , 1995 .

[6]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Designing technology to support reflection , 1999 .

[7]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments : toward cost-effective adaptive, interactive and intelligent educational software , 2003 .

[8]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[9]  W. V. van Joolingen,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[10]  W. R. van Joolingen,et al.  SimQuest: authoring educational simulations. , 2003 .

[11]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Cognitive Comparisons of Students' Systems Modeling in Ecology , 2001 .

[12]  Elwin R. Savelsbergh,et al.  The effect of external representation on constructing computer models of complex phenomena , 2003 .

[13]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning , 2002 .

[14]  J. Vermunt.  The regulation of constructive learning processes , 1998 .

[15]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Causal Model Progressions as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[16]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Modeling for Meaningful Learning , 2006 .

[17]  Koen Veermans,et al.  Intelligent support for discovery learning , 2003 .

[18]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Supporting exploratory learning by offering structured overviews of hypotheses , 1993 .

[19]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[20]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Simulation-Based Experiential Learning , 1993, NATO ASI Series.

[21]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Secondary Students' Dynamic Modeling Processes: Analyzing, Reasoning About, Synthesizing, and Testing Models of Stream Ecosystems , 1997 .

[22]  T. Jong,et al.  Measuring intuitive knowledge in science: The development of the what-if test , 1996 .

[23]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[25]  K. Crowley,et al.  Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. , 2001 .

[26]  D. Penner.  Building Knowledge and Meaning Through Modeling , 2002 .

[27]  F. Prins,et al.  Search & see: the roles of metacognitive skillfulness and intellectual ability during novice inductive learning in a complex computer-simulated environment. , 2002 .

[28]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[29]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Teaching and Learning Generic Modeling and Reasoning Skills , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[30]  Donald R. Griffin,et al.  Animal Mind — Human Mind , 1982 .

[31]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Operationalizing mental models: strategies for assessing mental models to support meaningful learning and design-supportive learning environments , 1995, CSCL.

[32]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[33]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviour and search outcomes , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[34]  Rainer H. Kluwe,et al.  Cognitive Knowledge and Executive Control: Metacognition , 1982 .

[35]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments , 2003 .

[36]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study , 2001 .

[37]  J. Huisman.  The Netherlands , 1996, The Lancet.

[38]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Making Dynamic Modeling Accessible to Precollege Science Students , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[39]  Henny van der Meijden,et al.  Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  D. Towne,et al.  Exploring a domain through a computer simulation: traversing variable and relation space with the help of a hypothesis scratchpad , 1993 .

[41]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[42]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Problem solving and education. , 1980 .

[43]  J. Bruner.  The act of discovery. , 1961 .

[44]  S. A. Manlove,et al.  Self-regulation and collaboration in a discovery learning environment , 2004 .

[45]  L. Schauble,et al.  Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation , 1991 .