DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Recommendations on the interpretation of Y-STR results in forensic analysis.

Forensic genetic laboratories perform a large amount of STR analyses of the Y chromosome, in particular to analyze the male part of complex DNA mixtures. However, the statistical interpretation of evidence retrieved from Y-STR haplotypes is challenging. Due to the uni-parental inheritance mode, Y-STR loci are connected to each other and thus haplotypes show patterns of relationship on the familial and population level. This precludes the treatment of Y-STR loci as independently inherited variables and the application of the product rule. Instead, the dependency structure of Y-STRs needs to be included in the haplotype frequency estimation process affecting also the current paradigm of a random match probability that is in the autosomal case approximated by the population frequency assuming unrelatedness of sampled individuals. Information on the degree of paternal relatedness in the suspect population as well as on the familial network is however needed to interpret Y-chromosomal results in the best possible way. The previous recommendations of the DNA commission of the ISFG on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis published more than a decade ago [1] cover the interpretation issue only marginally. The current recommendations address a number of topics (frequency estimators, databases, metapopulations, LR formulation, triage, rapidly mutating Y-STRs) with relevance for the Y-STR statistics and recommend a decision-based procedure, which takes into account legal requirements as well as availability of population data and statistical methods.

[1]  E. Milot,et al.  Must the random man be unrelated? A lingering misconception in forensic genetics , 2019, Forensic Science International.

[2]  C. Tyler-Smith,et al.  Dynamic nature of the proximal AZFc region of the human Y chromosome: multiple independent deletion and duplication events revealed by microsatellite analysis , 2008, Human mutation.

[3]  Michael Krawczak,et al.  Match probabilities for Y-chromosomal profiles: A paradigm shift. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  Michael C. Westaway,et al.  A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture , 2015, Genome research.

[6]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[7]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  P. de Knijff,et al.  A new future of forensic Y-chromosome analysis: rapidly mutating Y-STRs for differentiating male relatives and paternal lineages. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  Amy E. Decker,et al.  Chromosomal duplications along the Y-chromosome and their potential impact on Y-STR interpretation. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  P Gill,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  Duncan A. Taylor,et al.  Likelihood ratio development for mixed Y-STR profiles. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[12]  W. Parson,et al.  Internet Accessible Population Databases: YHRD and EMPOP , 2013 .

[13]  L. Roewer The Y-Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD) — Publicly Available Reference and Research Datasets for the Forensic Interpretation of Y-Chromosome STR Profiles , 2016 .

[14]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[15]  G. Bäßler,et al.  Gemeinsame Empfehlungen der Projektgruppe „Biostatistische DNA-Berechnungen“ und der Spurenkommission zur biostatistischen Bewertung von Y‑chromosomalen DNA-Befunden , 2018, Rechtsmedizin.

[16]  R. J. Mitchell,et al.  Genomic complexity of the Y-STR DYS19: inversions, deletions and founder lineages carrying duplications , 2008, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[17]  Charles H Brenner,et al.  Fundamental problem of forensic mathematics--the evidential value of a rare haplotype. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[18]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[19]  Walther Parson,et al.  Publication of population data of linearly inherited DNA markers in the International Journal of Legal Medicine , 2010, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[20]  Sascha Willuweit,et al.  The new Y Chromosome Haplotype Reference Database. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[21]  P. de Knijff,et al.  Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  Ulrike Schmidt,et al.  Significant genetic differentiation between Poland and Germany follows present-day political borders, as revealed by Y-chromosome analysis , 2005, Human Genetics.

[23]  Leonor Gusmão,et al.  New guidelines for the publication of genetic population data. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[24]  L. Roewer Y‐chromosome short tandem repeats in forensics—Sexing, profiling, and matching male DNA , 2019, WIREs Forensic Science.

[25]  Peter Gill,et al.  DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[26]  Christopher R. Gignoux,et al.  Standardized biogeographic grouping system for annotating populations in pharmacogenetic research , 2018, bioRxiv.

[27]  M. Krawczak,et al.  A Markov chain description of the stepwise mutation model: local and global behaviour of the allele process. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Mikkel Meyer Andersen,et al.  Discrete Laplace mixture model with applications in forensic genetics , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[29]  M. Kayser Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview , 2017, Human Genetics.

[30]  J. Curran,et al.  Estimation of Y haplotype frequencies with lower order dependencies. , 2019, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[31]  L. Roewer,et al.  Validation of a combined autosomal/Y-chromosomal STR approach for analyzing typical biological stains in sexual-assault cases. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[32]  M. Kayser,et al.  A novel multiplex assay for simultaneously analysing 13 rapidly mutating Y-STRs. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[33]  L. Roewer Y chromosome STR typing in crime casework , 2009, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[34]  M. Jobling,et al.  Detecting past male-mediated expansions using the Y chromosome , 2017, Human Genetics.

[35]  David J Balding,et al.  How convincing is a matching Y-chromosome profile? , 2017, bioRxiv.

[36]  J S Buckleton,et al.  The interpretation of lineage markers in forensic DNA testing. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[37]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .

[38]  Y-profile evidence: Close paternal relatives and mixtures. , 2019, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[39]  Duncan A. Taylor,et al.  Modelling the dependence structure of Y-STR haplotypes using graphical models. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[40]  R. Decorte,et al.  A game of hide and seq: Identification of parallel Y-STR evolution in deep-rooting pedigrees , 2018, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[41]  R. Lessig,et al.  Identification and characterization of novel rapidly mutating Y‐chromosomal short tandem repeat markers , 2020, Human mutation.

[42]  P. S. Eriksen,et al.  The discrete Laplace exponential family and estimation of Y-STR haplotype frequencies. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.