Strategies for multiattribute binary choice.

Based on eye-fixation patterns, strategies for multiattribute binary choice were classified as holistic (within an alternative) or dimensional (within an attribute across alternatives). In a task environment hospitable to both strategies, dimensional processing predominated. Even for alternatives like simple gambles, which require holistic computations, dimensional strategies were used as often as holistic ones. The dimensional strategies were augmented by two procedures that simplify the computations. These simplification procedures reduce cognitive effort at the cost of a relatively small increase in errors. However, for about half the subjects the use of these simplification procedures led to systematic violations of expected utility theory on certain choices. Both the preference for dimensional over holistic strategies and the adoption of simplifying procedures are compatible with the desire to reduce cognitive effort. We propose that strategies are selected to minimize the joint cost of errors and effort.

[1]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  A metric for the social consensus. , 1966, Science.

[2]  R. Ollman Fast guesses in choice reaction time , 1966 .

[3]  John I. Yellott,et al.  Correction for guessing in choice reaction time , 1967 .

[4]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Substitutability and similarity in binary choices , 1969 .

[6]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[7]  Donald L. Rumelhart,et al.  Similarity between stimuli: An experimental test of the Luce and Restle choice models. , 1971 .

[8]  J. Yellott Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time , 1971 .

[9]  R. Dawes A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. , 1971 .

[10]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[11]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[12]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[13]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Eye movements during visual search and memory search. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. , 1974 .

[15]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  The limbus reflection method for measuring eye position , 1975 .

[18]  P. Slovic Choice Between Equally Valued Alternatives. , 1975 .

[19]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[20]  S. Link The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[21]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of choice and judgment with multiattribute stimuli , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[24]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Effort control and judgments , 1977 .

[25]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  A Study of Intransitive Preferences using a Think Aloud Procedure , 1977 .

[26]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[27]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[28]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  Problem solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. , 1978 .

[30]  J. Payne,et al.  Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[31]  J. Payne,et al.  Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research , 1978 .

[32]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[33]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Eye Fixations Can Save the World: a Critical Evaluation and a Comparison Between Eye Fixations and Other Information Processing Methodologies , 1978 .

[34]  H. Lindman,et al.  Stimulus complexity and choice inconsistency among gambles , 1978 .

[35]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[36]  R. Olshavsky,et al.  Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice , 1979 .

[37]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs , 1979 .

[38]  O. Svenson Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[39]  James R. Bettman,et al.  Information Format and Choice Task Effects in Decision Making , 1979 .

[40]  J. Bettman An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[41]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[42]  Oswald Huber,et al.  The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model , 1980 .

[43]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[44]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes , 1980 .

[45]  Steven M. Shugan The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[46]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[47]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Gambling decisions and information about expected value. , 1982 .