The response of expenditures to anticipated income changes : panel data estimates

Standard models of intertemporal allocation predict that the time path of expenditures should beindependent of the time path of income. Recently two papers, Parker (1999) and Souleles (1999)have suggested that U.S. households have a high marginal propensity to spend within yearanticipated income changes. We use an expenditure survey panel from Spain to re-examine thisissue. We exploit two important features of the Spanish data. First, we have quarterly panel datathat follows households for more than four quarters. Second, we use the fact that workers areexogenously sorted into one of two payment schemes: some receive the same amount eachmonth of the year and others receive an extra payment in June and December. The extra paymentis large and predictable. We examine the detailed pattern of expenditures over the year to seewhether they differ between the two groups. We fail to find even weak differences. Wecomplement this with a conventional Euler equation analysis of excess sensitivity. Our predictingequation for (quarterly) earnings growth is much better than usual and is likely to give a powerfultest of the hypothesis that predictable changes in income do not lead to changes in expenditurepatterns. The results of this analysis confirm the graphical analysis: we find no evidence ofexcess sensitivity. We conclude that households in normal times do smooth consumption overthe year. We suggest a reconciliation of our results with those of Parker and Souleles.

[1]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Consumer Response to the Timing of Income: Evidence from a Change in Tax Withholding , 1993 .

[2]  Thomas F. Crossley,et al.  The Life Cycle Model of Consumption and Saving , 2000 .

[3]  David W. Wilcox Social Security Benefits, Consumption Expenditure, and the Life Cycle Hypothesis , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Jonathan A. Parker,et al.  The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes , 1999 .

[5]  R. Bodkin,et al.  The National Service Life-Insurance Dividend of 1950 and Consumption: A Further Test of the "Strict" Permanent-Income Hypothesis , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  J. Cochrane,et al.  The Sensitivity of Tests of the Intertemporal Allocation of Consumption to Near-Rational Alternatives , 1988 .

[7]  John Shea,et al.  Union contracts and the life-cycle/permanent-income hypothesis , 1995 .

[8]  Martin Browning,et al.  Household Saving: Micro Theories and Micro Facts , 1996 .

[9]  Martin Browning,et al.  Asking Consumption Questions in General Purpose Surveys , 2003 .

[10]  J. Maria Labeaga Azcona,et al.  Consumption and Habits: Evidence from Panel Data , 2002 .

[11]  Melvin Stephens &Apos;3rd of Tha Month&Apos;: Do Social Security Recipients Smooth Consumption between Checks? , 2002 .

[12]  J. Parker The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Payroll Tax Rates , 1997 .

[13]  C. Horioka Why is Japan's household saving rate so high? A literature survey☆ , 1990 .

[14]  Nicholas S. Souleles The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds , 1999 .

[15]  J. Poterba Are Consumers Forward Looking? Evidence from Fiscal Experiments , 1988 .