Wikipedia model for collective intelligence: a review of information quality

Online information seekers increasingly utilise the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia as a key reference source. Wikipedia's special feature is that it is based on the collective intelligence (CI) of lay citizens. Its consensus-building participatory knowledge-building processes replace traditional encyclopaedia processes founded on the knowledge of experts and gatekeeping practices. However there have been reports of concerns with the level of information quality provided by Wikipedia articles. This paper explores information quality for Wikipedia theoretically. First, it conceptualises the Wikipedia model of knowledge production and second, it analyses information quality for the model. Finally, the paper recommends some improvements for the model and discusses other implications for knowledge management theory and practice.

[1]  Anja Ebersbach-Markus Glaser,et al.  Towards Emancipatory Use of a Medium: The Wiki , 2004 .

[2]  Bernard Jacquemin,et al.  Managing conflicts between users in Wikipedia , 2008, BIS.

[3]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia , 2007, WWW '07.

[4]  Tero Ojanpera,et al.  The power of collective intelligence , 2011, 2011 IEEE Technology Time Machine Symposium on Technologies Beyond 2020.

[5]  John Riedl,et al.  Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia , 2007, GROUP.

[6]  Andrés Fernández-Ramos,et al.  The role of information competencies and skills in learning to abstract , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Marios Poulos,et al.  Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: an insight from Wikipedia , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  The Hidden Order of Wikipedia , 2007, HCI.

[9]  Alastair G. Smith,et al.  Reference and Information Services: An Introduction, 3rd Edition , 2000 .

[10]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia , 2008, CHI.

[11]  Lucy Holman Rector.  Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles , 2008 .

[12]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia , 2007, First Monday.

[13]  Alexandra Plows,et al.  Listening Without Prejudice? , 2007 .

[14]  Thomas Chesney,et al.  An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility , 2006, First Monday.

[15]  John Broughton.  Wikipedia: The Missing Manual , 2008 .

[16]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Science's new social contract with society , 1999, Nature.

[17]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  The Agora and the Role of Research Evaluation , 2003 .

[18]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  Information quality work organization in wikipedia , 2008 .

[19]  Penny Beile,et al.  Preparation Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research , 2008 .

[20]  Richard A. Swanson,et al.  The Foundations of Performance Improvement and Implications for Practice , 1999 .

[21]  Don Fallis,et al.  On Verifying the Accuracy of Information: Philosophical Perspectives , 2003, Libr. Trends.

[22]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Understanding Web Credibility: A Synthesis of the Research Literature , 2007, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Mathias Lux,et al.  The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies , 2007, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[24]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[25]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Penny M. Beile,et al.  Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation , 2005 .

[27]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[28]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases , 1993 .

[29]  Soo Young Rieh.  Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[31]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[32]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[33]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Empirical Assessment of Expertise , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[34]  Gary E. Gorman.  A tale of information ethics and encyclopædias; or, is Wikipedia just another internet scam? , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[35]  Derek Lackaff,et al.  An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  Daniel Stewart.  Social Status in an Open-Source Community , 2005 .

[37]  Pierre Lévy,et al.  Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace , 1997 .

[38]  Mordechai Gordon,et al.  What makes interdisciplinary research original? Integrative scholarship reconsidered , 2007 .

[39]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Media credibility and cognitive authority. The case of seeking orienting information , 2007, Inf. Res..

[40]  Les Gasser,et al.  Information quality work organization in wikipedia , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  INCONSISTENCY OF KNOWLEDGE AND COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE , 2008, Cybern. Syst..

[42]  L. M. Sanger.  The Fate of Expertise after Wikipedia , 2009, Episteme.

[43]  Soo Young Rieh.  Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002 .

[44]  Dorothy Auchter.  The evolution of the Encyclopaedia Britannica: from the Macropaedia to Britannica Online , 1999 .

[45]  Bryan A. Pendleton,et al.  Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie , 2006 .

[46]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  How users assess Web pages for information seeking , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  Andrew Lih,et al.  Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource , 2004 .

[48]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[50]  Hermann A. Maurer,et al.  Community Building around Encyclopaedic Knowledge , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Technol..

[51]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation , 2007, GROUP.

[52]  S. P. Singh.  Evaluation of Electronic Reference Sources , 2003 .

[53]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation , 2007, CIKM '07.

[54]  Les Gasser,et al.  Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia , 2005, ICIQ.

[55]  Richard Tutton,et al.  Shifting Subject Positions , 2007 .

[56]  Sean W. Smith,et al.  The Quality of Open Source Production: Zealots and Good Samaritans in the Case of Wikipedia , 2007 .

[57]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Wiki: A Technology for Conversational Knowledge Management and Group Collaboration , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..