Random walks and the gas model: spacing behaviour of Grey-Cheeked Mangabeys

1. Simple mechanical models (random walks and the ‘gas model’) were used to investigate the movement patterns and intergroup encounter rates of a high- and low-density subpopulation of Grey-Cheeked Mangabeys (Cercocebus albigena johnstoni, Lydeker) at two sites in the Kibale Forest, Western Uganda. 2. Random walk simulations showed that the presence of conspecific groups could act as ‘social barriers’ which constrained group movements, and promoted high levels of site attachment to a specific home range area. 3. Encounter rate models showed that in the low-density subpopulation (Kanyawara), intergroup encounters occurred no more frequently than expected if groups were moving randomly and independently of each other. This was in contrast to previous analyses which suggested that Grey-Cheeked Mangabeys employed a social spacing mechanism (mediated by male loud calls) in order to reduce the frequency of encounter to below chance levels. 4. Encounters in the high-density subpopulation (Ngogo) were found to occur less frequently than expected at short range (within 100 m). This was suggested to be due to the operation of a territorial mate defence strategy by males at this site.

[1]  W. J. Freeland Mangabey (Cercocebus albigena) , 1979 .

[2]  R. Ims Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles , 1988, Nature.

[3]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[4]  P. Waser Individual Recognition, Intragroup Cohesion and Intergroup Spacing: Evidence From Sound Playback To Forest Monkeys , 1977 .

[5]  C. Schaik Social Evolution in Primates: The Role of Ecological Factors and Male Behaviour , 1996 .

[6]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Primate social systems , 1987 .

[7]  Daniel DeMenthon,et al.  Measurement of body segment mass, center of gravity, and determination of moments of inertia by double pendulum in Lemur fulvus , 1987, American journal of primatology.

[8]  P. Waser,et al.  Monthly variations in feeding and activity patterns of the mangabey, Cercocebus albigena (Lydekker) , 1975 .

[9]  N. Chalmers Group composition, ecology and daily activities of free living mangabeys in Uganda. , 1968, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[10]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[11]  W. Cooper Vegetation of the Prince William Sound Region, Alaska; With a Brief Excursion into Post-Pleistocene Climatic History , 1942 .

[12]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Self-Structuring in Artificial "Chimps" Offers New Hypotheses for Male Grouping in Chimpanzees , 1994 .

[13]  P. Waser Cerococebus albigena: Site Attachment, Avoidance, and Intergroup Spacing , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Rebecca M. Ham Behaviour and ecology of grey-cheeked mangabeys (Cercocebus albigena) in the Lope reserve, Gabon , 1994 .

[15]  P. Waser 7 – Feeding, Ranging and Group Size in the Mangabey Cercocebus albigena , 1977 .

[16]  D. Cheney Interactions and relationships between groups , 1987 .

[17]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Reciprocation in apes: from complex cognition to self-structuring , 1996 .

[18]  Thomas M. Butynski,et al.  Comparative Ecology of Blue Monkeys (Cercopithecus Mitis) in High‐ and Low‐Density Subpopulations , 1990 .

[19]  R. Feynman,et al.  The Feynman Lectures on Physics Addison-Wesley Reading , 1963 .

[20]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Primates and their Societies , 1988 .