Fuel-Flexible Combustion System for Co-production Plant Applications

Future high-efficiency, low-emission generation plants that produce electric power, transportation fuels, and/or chemicals from fossil fuel feed stocks require a new class of fuel-flexible combustors. In this program, a validated combustor approach was developed which enables single-digit NO{sub x} operation for a future generation plants with low-Btu off gas and allows the flexibility of process-independent backup with natural gas. This combustion technology overcomes the limitations of current syngas gas turbine combustion systems, which are designed on a site-by-site basis, and enable improved future co-generation plant designs. In this capacity, the fuel-flexible combustor enhances the efficiency and productivity of future co-production plants. In task 2, a summary of market requested fuel gas compositions was created and the syngas fuel space was characterized. Additionally, a technology matrix and chemical kinetic models were used to evaluate various combustion technologies and to select two combustor concepts. In task 4 systems analysis of a co-production plant in conjunction with chemical kinetic analysis was performed to determine the desired combustor operating conditions for the burner concepts. Task 5 discusses the experimental evaluation of three syngas capable combustor designs. The hybrid combustor, Prototype-1 utilized a diffusion flame approach for syngas fuels with a lean premixed swirl concept for natural gas fuels for both syngas and natural gas fuels at FA+e gas turbine conditions. The hybrid nozzle was sized to accommodate syngas fuels ranging from {approx}100 to 280 btu/scf and with a diffusion tip geometry optimized for Early Entry Co-generation Plant (EECP) fuel compositions. The swozzle concept utilized existing GE DLN design methodologies to eliminate flow separation and enhance fuel-air mixing. With changing business priorities, a fully premixed natural gas & syngas nozzle, Protoytpe-1N, was also developed later in the program. It did not have the diluent requirements of Prototype-1 and was demonstrated at targeted gas turbine conditions. The TVC combustor, Prototype-2, premixes the syngas with air for low emission performance. The combustor was designed for operation with syngas and no additional diluents. The combustor was successfully operated at targeted gas turbine conditions. Another goal of the program was to advance the status of development tools for syngas systems. In Task 3 a syngas flame evaluation facility was developed. Fundamental data on syngas flame speeds and flame strain were obtained at pressure for a wide range of syngas fuels with preheated air. Several promising reduced order kinetic mechanisms were compared with the results from the evaluation facility. The mechanism with the best agreement was selected for application to syngas combustor modeling studies in Task 6. Prototype-1 was modeled using an advanced LES combustion code. The tools and combustor technology development culminate in a full-scale demonstration of the most promising technology in Task 8. The combustor was operated at engine conditions and evaluated against the various engine performance requirements.

[1]  Manfred Aigner,et al.  Investigations of swirl flames in a gas turbine model combustor: I. Flow field, structures, temperature, and species distributions , 2006 .

[2]  Wolfgang Meier,et al.  Investigations of swirl flames in a gas turbine model combustor: II. Turbulence–chemistry interactions , 2006 .

[3]  Johannes Janicka,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of a bluff-body stabilized nonpremixed flame , 2006 .

[4]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  A consistent level set formulation for large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion , 2005 .

[5]  Sukesh Roy,et al.  Dual-pump dual-broadband CARS for exhaust-gas temperature and CO2–O2–N2 mole-fraction measurements in model gas-turbine combustors , 2005 .

[6]  Sunil James,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Gas Turbine Combustors , 2005 .

[7]  V. Sankaran,et al.  Subgrid combustion modeling of 3-D premixed flames in the thin-reaction-zone regime , 2005 .

[8]  J. Haynes,et al.  Evaluation of Emissions Performance of Existing Combustion Technologies for Syngas Combustion , 2005 .

[9]  R. Koch,et al.  Compressible large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes , 2004 .

[10]  S. Menon,et al.  LES of Premixed Combustion and Pollutant Emission in a DOE-HAT Combustor , 2003 .

[11]  Jiongming Ruan,et al.  Combined effects of nongray radiation and pressure on premixed CH4/O2/CO2 flames , 2001 .

[12]  H. Mongia,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of a Gas Turbine Combustor Flow , 1999 .

[13]  F. Egolfopoulos,et al.  Wall effects on the propagation and extinction of steady, strained, laminar premixed flames , 1997 .

[14]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation , 1997 .

[15]  I. McLean,et al.  The use of carbon monoxide/hydrogen burning velocities to examine the rate of the CO+OH reaction , 1994 .

[16]  Ulrich Maas,et al.  Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space , 1992 .

[17]  Thierry Poinsot,et al.  Quenching processes and premixed turbulent combustion diagrams , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  A. Trouvé Simulation of flame-turbulence interactions in premixed combustion , 1991 .

[19]  F. Egolfopoulos,et al.  Laminar flame speeds of methane-air mixtures under reduced and elevated pressures. Journal paper, 1985-1988 , 1989 .

[20]  F. Egolfopoulos,et al.  Experimental and numerical determination of laminar flame speeds of methane/(Ar, N2, CO2)-air mixtures as function of stoichiometry, pressure, and flame temperature , 1989 .

[21]  G. Andrews,et al.  Determination of burning velocities: A critical review , 1972 .