Assessment of Tumor Thickness in Melanocytic Skin Lesions: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography, 20-MHz Ultrasound and Histopathology

Background: Accurate assessment of vertical tumor size is important for surgical treatment planning of melanocytic skin lesions. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) is frequently used for this purpose, but overestimation of tumor thickness is known as a problem especially in thin melanocytic lesions. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a new imaging technique might be a promising alternative. Objective: To evaluate the ability of OCT to accurately determine the vertical tumor thickness of melanocytic skin lesions and to compare it with HFUS and histopathology in order to improve surgical planning. Methods: In this single-center study, 26 melanocytic lesions were imaged by OCT and HFUS. Vertical lesion dimensions of both methods were compared with histopathological measurements. Results: Bland-Altman plots for OCT and histopathology as well as for HFUS and histopathology revealed better agreement for OCT and histopathology concerning tumor thickness measurements. Tumor thickness values for the melanocytic lesions measured by OCT presented a median tumor thickness of 0.31 mm (range 0.10–0.77) compared to a median tumor thickness of 0.25 mm (range 0.06–1.5) measured by histopathology. The median tumor thickness of HFUS was 0.44 mm (range 0.23–1.1). A Spearman correlation procedure including the correlation coefficient (r) showed a stronger relationship between OCT and histopathology (r = 0.734) compared to HFUS and histopathology (r = 0.390). Conclusions: On the basis of this smaller study cohort, OCT seems to be more exact than HFUS as far as thickness determination of thin melanocytic skin lesions is concerned.

[1]  R Birngruber,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human skin. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  J. Malvehy,et al.  Preoperative assessment of cutaneous melanoma thickness using 10-MHz sonography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  G. Lang,et al.  [Optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy of conjunctival and eyelid lesions]. , 2003, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[4]  D. Grossman,et al.  Strategies for early melanoma detection: Approaches to the patient with nevi. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  Thilo Gambichler,et al.  Characterization of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions using optical coherence tomography in vivo. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  T. Bieber,et al.  High-Resolution Ultrasound Combined with Power Doppler Sonography Can Reduce the Number of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsies in Cutaneous Melanoma , 2011, Dermatology.

[7]  G. Jemec,et al.  Anatomical Detection of Inflammatory Changes Associated with Plantar Warts by Ultrasound , 2010, Dermatology.

[8]  G. Jemec,et al.  In vivo thickness measurement of basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis with optical coherence tomography and 20‐MHz ultrasound , 2009, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  M. Hofmann,et al.  Validation of optical coherence tomography in vivo using cryostat histology. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  H H Wolff,et al.  Changes in function and morphology of normal human skin: evaluation using optical coherence tomography , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  Gregor B.E. Jemec,et al.  Morphology and Epidermal Thickness of Normal Skin Imaged by Optical Coherence Tomography , 2008, Dermatology.

[12]  G. Gelikonov,et al.  In vivo optical coherence tomography imaging of human skin: norm and pathology , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[13]  T. M. Joergensen,et al.  Assessment of Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in the Diagnosis of Non‐Melanoma Skin Cancer and Benign Lesions Versus Normal Skin: Observer‐Blinded Evaluation by Dermatologists and Pathologists , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[14]  T. Gambichler,et al.  Optical coherence tomography in dermatology: technical and clinical aspects , 2011, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[15]  Ashfaq A Marghoob,et al.  Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  F. Kiesewetter,et al.  [Value of high resolution ultrasound in determination of vertical tumor thickness in malignant melanoma of the skin]. , 1990, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[17]  Michael Vogt,et al.  Preoperative Ultrasonic Assessment of Thin Melanocytic Skin Lesions Using a 100‐MHz Ultrasound Transducer: A Comparative Study , 2007, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[18]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Correlation of Thickness of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Optical Coherence Tomography In Vivo and Routine Histologic Findings: A Pilot Study , 2007, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[19]  Jingjing Sun,et al.  Comparison of pulsed photothermal radiometry, optical coherence tomography and ultrasound for melanoma thickness measurement in PDMS tissue phantoms , 2011, Journal of biophotonics.

[20]  Bruno Giraudeau,et al.  Preoperative measurement of thickness of cutaneous melanoma using high-resolution 20 MHz ultrasound imaging: A monocenter prospective study and systematic review of the literature. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  P Altmeyer,et al.  Malignant melanoma in 20-MHz B scan sonography. , 1992, Dermatology.

[22]  J Hiss,et al.  Preoperative ultrasonic measurements of the thickness of cutaneous malignant melanoma. , 1984, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.