Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach

Purpose To reduce reoperation rates for image-guided breast-conserving surgery, the enhanced sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) supine imaging may be leveraged. However, accurate tissue correspondence between images and their physical counterpart in the surgical presentation is challenging due to breast deformations (e.g., from patient/arm position changes, and operating room table rotation differences). In this study, standard rigid registration methods are employed and tissue deformation is characterized. Methods On n  = 10 healthy breasts, surface displacements were measured by comparing intraoperative fiducial locations as the arm was moved from conventional MR scanning positions (arm-down and arm-up) to the laterally extended surgical configuration. Supine MR images in the arm-down and arm-up positions were registered to mock intraoperative presentations. Results Breast displacements from a supine MR imaging configuration to a mock surgical presentation were 28.9 ± 9.2 mm with shifts occurring primarily in the inferior/superior direction. With respect to supine MR to surgical alignment, the average fiducial, target, and maximum target registration errors were 9.0 ± 1.7 mm, 9.3 ± 1.7 mm, and 20.0 ± 7.6 mm, respectively. Even when maintaining similar arm positions in the MR image and mock surgery, the respective averages were 6.0 ± 1.0 mm, 6.5 ± 1.1 mm, and 12.5 ± 2.8 mm. Conclusion From supine MR positioning to surgical presentation, the breast undergoes large displacements (9.9–70.1 mm). The data also suggest that significant nonrigid deformations (9.3 ± 1.7 mm with 20.0 mm average maximum) exist that need to be considered in image guidance and modeling applications.

[1]  Andrew H. S. Lee,et al.  Why is carcinoma of the breast more frequent in the upper outer quadrant? A case series based on needle core biopsy diagnoses. , 2005, Breast.

[2]  R. Ha,et al.  Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT Surgical Guidance System for Localization and Excision of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Feasibility Study. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Ralph T. Wynn,et al.  Beyond Wires and Seeds: Reflector-guided Breast Lesion Localization and Excision. , 2017, Radiology.

[4]  G. Karadeniz Cakmak,et al.  Surgeon performed continuous intraoperative ultrasound guidance decreases re-excisions and mastectomy rates in breast cancer. , 2017, Breast.

[5]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[6]  C. Lehman,et al.  Evaluation of a Nonradioactive Magnetic Marker Wireless Localization Program. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  V. Krishnaswamy,et al.  A Randomized Prospective Trial of Supine MRI-Guided Versus Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer , 2019, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  Sotirios A. Tsaftaris,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention , 2017 .

[9]  T. Ruers,et al.  Feasibility of magnetic marker localisation for non-palpable breast cancer. , 2017, Breast.

[10]  Michael I. Miga,et al.  Textual fiducial detection in breast conserving surgery for a near-real time image guidance system , 2020, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[11]  T. Ignatov,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery in the determination of adequate surgical margins , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[12]  C. Murphy,et al.  Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines. , 2017, American journal of surgery.

[13]  E. Rutgers,et al.  On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. , 2010, Medical physics.

[14]  P. Whitworth,et al.  Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  Tanja Alderliesten,et al.  On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. , 2010, Medical physics.

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .

[17]  Michael I Miga,et al.  Non-rigid registration of breast surfaces using the laplace and diffusion equations , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[18]  Juan Pablo Salazar,et al.  Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy Versus Mammographic Wire Localization for Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Treatment , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  A. Soran,et al.  Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  P. Darbre Recorded quadrant incidence of female breast cancer in Great Britain suggests a disproportionate increase in the upper outer quadrant of the breast. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[21]  Thomas E. Yankeelov,et al.  Image to physical space registration of supine breast MRI for image guided breast surgery , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Thomas E. Yankeelov,et al.  Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[23]  Jagadeesan Jayender,et al.  Intraoperative Supine Breast MR Imaging to Quantify Tumor Deformation and Detection of Residual Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results. , 2016, Radiology.

[24]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Combining supine MRI and 3D optical scanning for improved surgical planning of breast conserving surgeries , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[28]  R. Chang,et al.  Evaluation of the association between quantitative mammographic density and breast cancer occurred in different quadrants , 2017, BMC Cancer.

[29]  B. Pockaj,et al.  Radioactive seed localization for breast conservation surgery: Low positive margin rate with no learning curve. , 2017, American journal of surgery.

[30]  C. McGahan,et al.  Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[31]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Breast cancer statistics, 2019 , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[32]  H. Karanlık,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery , 2015, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  S. Lujic,et al.  Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data , 2018, BMJ Open.

[34]  S. Meijer,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT). , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[35]  J. Jayender,et al.  Feasibility of Intraoperative Breast MRI and the Role of Prone Versus Supine Positioning in Surgical Planning for Breast‐Conserving Surgery , 2017, The breast journal.

[36]  M. Specht,et al.  Evaluation of a Nonradioactive Magnetic Marker Wireless Localization Program. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[38]  Thomas L Klausen,et al.  Radioactive Seed Localization or Wire-guided Localization of Nonpalpable Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Trial , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[39]  Shinji Naganawa,et al.  Prediction of prone-to-supine tumor displacement in the breast using patient position change: investigation with prone MRI and supine CT , 2014, Breast Cancer.

[40]  Mehran Ebrahimi,et al.  Using surface markers for MRI guided breast conserving surgery: a feasibility survey , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Supine Breast MRI and 3D Optical Scanning: A Novel Approach to Improve Tumor Localization for Breast Conserving Surgery , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[42]  H. Cody,et al.  Reexcision--The Other Breast Cancer Epidemic. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  V. Klimberg,et al.  Advances in the Diagnosis and Excision of Breast Cancer , 2003, The American surgeon.

[44]  Michael I. Miga,et al.  The image-to-physical liver registration sparse data challenge: characterizing inverse biomechanical model resolution , 2020, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[45]  V. Krishnaswamy,et al.  The shape of breast cancer , 2020, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.