LuSens: a keratinocyte based ARE reporter gene assay for use in integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization hazard identification.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert Landsiedel | Annette Mehling | Ben van Ravenzwaay | Susanne N Kolle | Daniel Urbisch | T. Ramírez | B. van Ravenzwaay | R. Landsiedel | W. Teubner | S. Kolle | A. Mehling | D. Urbisch | Wera Teubner | Tobias Eltze | A. Aumann | C. Wruck | Tzutzuy Ramirez | Alexandra Aumann | Christoph J Wruck | T. Eltze
[1] P. Nioi,et al. Contribution of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 to protection against carcinogenesis, and regulation of its gene by the Nrf2 basic-region leucine zipper and the arylhydrocarbon receptor basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. , 2004, Mutation research.
[2] I Kimber,et al. Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[3] Petra S Kern,et al. Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.
[4] C. Hansson,et al. Stereochemical Considerations on Concomitant Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Ester of the cis-trans Isomeric Compounds Maleic Acid and Fumaric Acid , 2003, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.
[5] Gerberick Frank,et al. The intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and predictivity of the KeratinoSens assay to predict skin sensitizers in vitro: results of a ring-study in five laboratories. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[6] Jean Krutmann,et al. Xenobiotic metabolism capacities of human skin in comparison with a 3D epidermis model and keratinocyte-based cell culture as in vitro alternatives for chemical testing: activating enzymes (Phase I): Phase I xenobiotic metabolism in human skin and in vitro skin models , 2012 .
[7] W. Wasserman,et al. Comprehensive analysis of proteins which interact with the antioxidant responsive element: correlation of ARE-BP-1 with the chemoprotective induction response. , 1997, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.
[8] I Kimber,et al. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay , 2000, Contact dermatitis.
[9] D. Basketter,et al. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. , 1994, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[10] M. S. Lee,et al. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[11] J. Pennings,et al. Keratinocyte gene expression profiles discriminate sensitizing and irritating compounds. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[12] David W Roberts,et al. Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.
[13] DelindaA . Johnson,et al. The Nrf2–ARE Pathway , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[14] Silvia Casati,et al. Skin sensitisation--moving forward with non-animal testing strategies for regulatory purposes in the EU. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[15] F. Oesch,et al. Xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme activities in cells used for testing skin sensitization in vitro , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.
[16] R. Saracci,et al. Describing the validity of carcinogen screening tests. , 1979, British Journal of Cancer.
[17] Grace Patlewicz,et al. A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.
[18] J. Geier,et al. Contact allergy to fragrances: current patch test results (2005–2008) from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology * , 2010, Contact dermatitis.
[19] Silvia Casati,et al. Chemical reactivity measurement and the predicitve identification of skin sensitisers. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 64. , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[20] Petra Kern,et al. A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation , 2013, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.
[21] I Kimber,et al. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.
[22] M. Pallardy,et al. HMOX1 and NQO1 genes are upregulated in response to contact sensitizers in dendritic cells and THP-1 cell line: role of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[23] Masayuki Yamamoto,et al. Nrf2-Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism. , 2004, Trends in molecular medicine.
[24] I Kimber,et al. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[25] F. Alan Andersen,et al. Final Amended Report on the Safety Assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in Cosmetic Products 1 , 2008, International journal of toxicology.
[26] J. Geier,et al. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.
[27] Jean Krutmann,et al. Xenobiotic metabolism capacities of human skin in comparison with a 3D epidermis model and keratinocyte‐based cell culture as in vitro alternatives for chemical testing: activating enzymes (Phase I) , 2012, Experimental dermatology.
[28] Lewis Looper,et al. Executive Agency for Health and Consumers , 2014 .
[29] K Schneider,et al. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays. , 2004, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[30] I Kimber,et al. The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[31] E. Fabian,et al. Relevance of xenobiotic enzymes in human skin in vitro models to activate pro-sensitizers , 2012, Journal of immunotoxicology.
[32] Torkil Menné,et al. The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals Part I , 2012, Contact dermatitis.
[33] M. Shankaranarayana,et al. Toxicity Profile of Lutein and Lutein Ester Isolated From Marigold Flowers (Tagetes erecta) , 2008, International journal of toxicology.
[34] J Hilton,et al. The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.
[35] M K Robinson,et al. A risk assessment process for allergic contact sensitization. , 1989, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[36] David W Roberts,et al. Chemical mechanisms for skin sensitization by aromatic compounds with hydroxy and amino groups. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.
[37] Robert Landsiedel,et al. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[38] V. Ziegler,et al. Allergic and irritant potential of benzoyl peroxide , 1985, Contact dermatitis.
[39] Andreas Natsch,et al. Skin Sensitizers Induce Antioxidant Response Element Dependent Genes: Application to the In Vitro Testing of the Sensitization Potential of Chemicals , 2008 .
[40] Casati Silvia,et al. EURL ECVAM Strategy for Replacement of Animal Testing for Skin Sensitisation Hazard Identification and Classification , 2013 .
[41] Ian Kimber,et al. Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[42] Andreas Natsch,et al. Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.
[43] K. Andersen,et al. Predictive testing in contact dermatitis. Allergic contact dermatitis. , 1997, Clinics in dermatology.
[44] D. Basketter,et al. Skin Irritation and Sensitization: Mechanisms and New Approaches for Risk Assessment , 2008, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.
[45] João Barroso,et al. Categorization of Chemicals According to Their Relative Human Skin Sensitizing Potency , 2014, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.
[46] Robert Landsiedel,et al. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.
[47] Davide Viaggi,et al. JRC SCIENTIFIC AND POLICY REPORTS , 2014 .
[48] J. Wakefield,et al. NRF2 Oxidative Stress Induced by Heavy Metals is Cell Type Dependent , 2011, Current chemical genomics.