IPv4-v6 transition mechanisms network performance evaluation on operating systems

Last few decades has brought many fundamental changes to data communications and the Internet. Internet has its roots in a networking project started by ARPA which consisted of four computers. Now the Internet spans the However transition to the new version has been remarkably slow. Thus in the interim, various transition mechanisms can be employed. In this paper two such mechanisms, namely configured tunnel and 6to4 transition mechanism, have been empirically evaluated for performance. Both mechanisms are implemented on two different Linux distributions, and performance related metrics like throughput, delay, jitter and CPU usage of the transition end nodes are measured. The results obtained on the test-bed show that TCP/UDP throughput and jitter values of the two mechanisms are similar, but delay reading is significantly different depending on the choice of transition mechanism and operating system.

[1]  Qingxian Wang,et al.  Discovering IPv6 network topology , 2005, IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology, 2005. ISCIT 2005..

[2]  Shaneel Narayan,et al.  IPv4-v6 configured tunnel and 6to4 transition mechanisms network performance evaluation on Linux operating systems , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing Systems.

[3]  A. Taa,et al.  Implementation of IPv4 Over IPv6 using Dual Stack Transition Mechanism (DSTM) on 6iNet , 2006, 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies.

[4]  Irfan-Ullah Awan,et al.  A Comparison Between the Tunneling Process and Mapping Schemes for IPv4/IPv6 Transition , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[5]  Jivika Govil,et al.  An examination of IPv4 and IPv6 networks : Constraints and various transition mechanisms , 2008, IEEE SoutheastCon 2008.

[6]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Evaluating IPv4 to IPv6 transition mechanisms , 2003, 10th International Conference on Telecommunications, 2003. ICT 2003..

[7]  A. Botta,et al.  Multi-protocol and Multi-platform Traffic Generation and Measurement , 2010 .

[8]  Myung-Ki Shin,et al.  An empirical analysis of IPv6 transition mechanisms , 2006, 2006 8th International Conference Advanced Communication Technology.

[9]  Eun-Young Park,et al.  An IPv4-to-IPv6 dual stack transition mechanism supporting transparent connections between IPv6 hosts and IPv4 hosts in integrated IPv6/IPv4 network , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[10]  Irfan-Ullah Awan,et al.  Evaluating BDMS and DSTM Transition Mechanisms , 2008, 2008 Second UKSIM European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation.

[11]  R. Budiarto,et al.  Protecting teredo clients from source routing exploits , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Distributed Framework and Applications.

[12]  Shang-Juh Kao,et al.  Managing the co-existing network of IPv6 and IPv4 under various transition mechanisms , 2005, Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05).

[13]  B. Issac,et al.  Analysis of IPv6 Network Communication Using Simulation , 2006, 2006 4th Student Conference on Research and Development.

[14]  Ruri Hiromi,et al.  Problems on IPv4-IPv6 network transition , 2006, International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINTW'06).

[15]  Yong Geun Hong,et al.  Application translation for IPv6 at NAT-PT , 2003, 9th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.03EX732).

[16]  Shaneel Narayan,et al.  Network performance evaluation of IPv4-v6 configured tunnel and 6to4 transition mechanisms on windows server operating systems , 2010, 2010 International Conference On Computer Design and Applications.

[17]  Hiroshi Esaki,et al.  JGN IPv6 network , 2003, 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops, 2003. Proceedings..

[18]  Fangzhe Chang,et al.  Realizing the transition to IPv6 , 2002 .