Australian Interventions for Women in Computing: Are We Evaluating

There are many reasons why the gender imbalance in computing should be of concern to the profession. Over the last 20 years there have been many intervention programs which attempt to redress this situation and encourage more women into computing. To determine whether an intervention program has made a difference requires evaluation. Program evaluation is the careful collecting of information about a program so that those responsible can make informed decisions regarding the programs. This multi-case study investigation into 14 major programs conducted in Australia shows that many projects are not evaluated due to a lack of time, expertise and money. Without dissemination of detailed evaluations it is not possible to work out which intervention programs should be replicated and which should be modified or abandoned.

[1]  J. Edwards,et al.  A Sorry Tale - A Study of Women's Participation in IT Higher Education in Australia , 2001, J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Amy Pearl,et al.  Women in computing , 1995, CACM.

[3]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  E. Trauth.  What can we learn from gender research? Seven lessons for business research methods , 2011 .

[5]  Maria M. Klawe,et al.  Women in computing---take 2 , 2009, CACM.

[6]  Kate M. Kaiser,et al.  Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: a model of girls' career choices , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[7]  Carol H. Weiss.  Evaluation : methods for studying programs and policies , 1997 .

[8]  G. J. Teague.  Perceptions and misperceptions of computing careers , 1999 .

[9]  Alison Adam,et al.  A Decade of Neglect: Reflecting on Gender and IS , 2004 .

[10]  Teri Perl,et al.  Priming the pipeline , 2002, SGCS.

[11]  Saïd Assar,et al.  Information and Communications Technology in Education , 2015 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  Carter McNamara,et al.  A basic guide to program evaluation. , 2007 .

[14]  Catherine Lang,et al.  Twenty-first Century Australian Women and IT: Exercising the power of choice , 2007, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[15]  Lorraine Staehr,et al.  Intervention programmes to recruit female computing students: why do the programme champions do it? , 1998, ACE '09.

[16]  V. Clarke.  Sex Differences in Computing Participation: Concerns, Extent, Reasons and Strategies , 1990 .

[17]  Vashti Galpin,et al.  Women in computing around the world , 2002, SGCS.

[18]  F Flam,et al.  Still a "Chilly Climate" for Women? , 1991, Science.

[19]  Alison Adam,et al.  Women in Computing , 1997 .

[20]  Kirsty Williamson.  Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals , 2002 .

[21]  Judy McKay,et al.  The next wave of gender projects in IT curriculum teaching at universities , 2006 .

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Telle Whitney,et al.  Priming the Pipeline: Addressing Gender-Based Barriers in Computing , 2013, Computer.

[24]  Jenine Beekhuyzen,et al.  Thought and Action: The WinIT perspective - Strategies for increasing female participation in IT , 2005 .

[25]  R. Brickman,et al.  The evaluation enterprise, by William R. Meyers. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981, 266 pp. Price: $15.95 cloth , 1983 .

[26]  Iwona Miliszewska,et al.  Encouraging Girls to Consider a Career in ICT: A Review of Strategies , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[27]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[28]  Teresa Lynch,et al.  Ten years of strategies to increase participation of women in computing programs: the Central Queensland University experience: 1999--2001 , 2002, SGCS.

[29]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  IT employment prospects: beyond the dotcom bubble , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Joanne McGrath Cohoon,et al.  Improving gender composition in computing , 2012, CACM.

[31]  Jane Chu Prey,et al.  Fostering Gender Diversity in Computing , 2013, Computer.

[32]  F. Burstein,et al.  Chapter 2 – The two major traditions of research , 2002 .

[33]  Jenine P. Beekhuyzen,et al.  Now I know what ICT can do for me! , 2012, Inf. Syst. J..

[34]  John Riedl,et al.  WP:clubhouse?: an exploration of Wikipedia's gender imbalance , 2011, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[35]  Julie Fisher,et al.  Closing the gap: Women education and information technology courses in Australia , 1998, J. Syst. Softw..

[36]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[37]  Ann Light,et al.  Rocket science or social science? Involving women in the creation of computing , 2004 .

[38]  Annemieke Craig,et al.  Intervention programmes to recruit female computing students: why do the programme champions do it? , 2009, ACE '09.