Discrete analyses of protein dynamics

Abstract Protein structures are highly dynamic macromolecules. This dynamics is often analysed through experimental and/or computational methods only for an isolated or a limited number of proteins. Here, we explore large-scale protein dynamics simulation to observe dynamics of local protein conformations using different perspectives. We analysed molecular dynamics to investigate protein flexibility locally, using classical approaches such as RMSf, solvent accessibility, but also innovative approaches such as local entropy. First, we focussed on classical secondary structures and analysed specifically how β-strand, β–turns, and bends evolve during molecular simulations. We underlined interesting specific bias between β–turns and bends, which are considered as the same category, while their dynamics show differences. Second, we used a structural alphabet that is able to approximate every part of the protein structures conformations, namely protein blocks (PBs) to analyse (i) how each initial local protein conformations evolve during dynamics and (ii) if some exchange can exist among these PBs. Interestingly, the results are largely complex than simple regular/rigid and coil/flexible exchange. Abbreviations N eq number of equivalent PB Protein Blocks PDB Protein DataBank RMSf root mean square fluctuations Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

[1]  G. Shanmugam,et al.  Engineering of a skin-fiber-opening enzyme for sulfide-free leather beam house operation through xenobiology , 2019, Green Chemistry.

[2]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Novel Intersubunit Interaction Critical for HIV-1 Core Assembly Defines a Potentially Targetable Inhibitor Binding Pocket , 2019, mBio.

[3]  L. Vyklický,et al.  The LILI Motif of M3-S2 Linkers Is a Component of the NMDA Receptor Channel Gate , 2018, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[4]  Narayanaswamy Srinivasan,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of protein backbone conformation using a structural alphabet , 2017, bioRxiv.

[5]  A. D. de Brevern,et al.  In silico analysis of Glanzmann variants of Calf-1 domain of αIIbβ3 integrin revealed dynamic allosteric effect , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  Dynamics and deformability of α-, 310- and π-helices , 2017 .

[7]  A. D. de Brevern,et al.  PBxplore: a tool to analyze local protein structure and deformability with Protein Blocks , 2017, bioRxiv.

[8]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  Recent advances on polyproline II , 2017, Amino Acids.

[9]  Alexandre G. de Brevern,et al.  Extension of the classical classification of β-turns. , 2016 .

[10]  A. D. de Brevern Extension of the classical classification of β-turns , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  A. D. de Brevern,et al.  ORION: a web server for protein fold recognition and structure prediction using evolutionary hybrid profiles , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Daniele Raimondi,et al.  Early Folding Events, Local Interactions, and Conservation of Protein Backbone Rigidity. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Alexandre G. de Brevern,et al.  Improving protein fold recognition with hybrid profiles combining sequence and structure evolution , 2015, Bioinform..

[14]  Bohdan Schneider,et al.  Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets , 2015, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[15]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  Use of a structural alphabet to find compatible folds for amino acid sequences , 2015, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Gert Vriend,et al.  A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Alexandre G. de Brevern,et al.  PolyprOnline: polyproline helix II and secondary structure assignment database , 2014, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[18]  A. D. de Brevern,et al.  Modeling and molecular dynamics simulations of the V33 variant of the integrin subunit β3: Structural comparison with the L33 (HPA-1a) and P33 (HPA-1b) variants. , 2014, Biochimie.

[19]  Jean-Christophe Gelly,et al.  Local dynamics of proteins and DNA evaluated from crystallographic B factors , 2014, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[20]  Pierrick Craveur,et al.  PTM-SD: a database of structurally resolved and annotated posttranslational modifications in proteins , 2014, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[21]  Jean-Christophe Gelly,et al.  mulPBA: an efficient multiple protein structure alignment method based on a structural alphabet , 2014, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[22]  Steven E. Brenner,et al.  SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins—extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Bioinformatic analysis of the protein/DNA interface , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  Pierrick Craveur,et al.  β‐Bulges: Extensive structural analyses of β‐sheets irregularities , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  H. Vaudry,et al.  PRR repeats in the intracellular domain of KISS1R are important for its export to cell membrane. , 2013, Molecular endocrinology.

[26]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..

[27]  A. D. de Brevern,et al.  Modeling and Molecular Dynamics of HPA-1a and -1b Polymorphisms: Effects on the Structure of the β3 Subunit of the αIIbβ3 Integrin , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  G. Vriend,et al.  Exploring Protein Dynamics Space: The Dynasome as the Missing Link between Protein Structure and Function , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  A. D. de Brevern,et al.  Assignment of PolyProline II Conformation and Analysis of Sequence – Structure Relationship , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  Catherine Etchebest,et al.  Predicting protein flexibility through the prediction of local structures , 2011, Proteins.

[31]  Jaemin Shin,et al.  SABA (secondary structure assignment program based on only alpha carbons): a novel pseudo center geometrical criterion for accurate assignment of protein secondary structures. , 2011, BMB reports.

[32]  Tim A. H. te Beek,et al.  A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Aurélie Bornot,et al.  Local Structure Alphabets , 2010 .

[34]  Bohdan Schneider,et al.  A short survey on protein blocks , 2010, Biophysical Reviews.

[35]  R Dustin Schaeffer,et al.  Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics. , 2010, Structure.

[36]  Qian-zhong Li,et al.  Using K-minimum increment of diversity to predict secretory proteins of malaria parasite based on groupings of amino acids , 2010, Amino Acids.

[37]  George Karypis,et al.  svmPRAT: SVM-based Protein Residue Annotation Toolkit , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[38]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Dynameomics: a consensus view of the protein unfolding/folding transition state ensemble across a diverse set of protein folds. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Qian-zhong Li,et al.  Using reduced amino acid composition to predict defensin family and subfamily: Integrating similarity measure and structural alphabet , 2009, Peptides.

[40]  A. Bornot,et al.  Analysis of loop boundaries using different local structure assignment methods , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  Catherine Etchebest,et al.  A new prediction strategy for long local protein structures using an original description , 2009, Proteins.

[42]  Alexandre G. de Brevern,et al.  Protein short loop prediction in terms of a structural alphabet , 2009, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[43]  Ludovic Autin,et al.  In silico studies on DARC. , 2009, Infectious disorders drug targets.

[44]  Haiyan Liu,et al.  Fragment‐based local statistical potentials derived by combining an alphabet of protein local structures with secondary structures and solvent accessibilities , 2009, Proteins.

[45]  Cristina Benros,et al.  Analyzing the sequence-structure relationship of a library of local structural prototypes. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  Baldomero Oliva,et al.  Including Functional Annotations and Extending the Collection of Structural Classifications of Protein Loops (ArchDB) , 2007, Bioinformatics and biology insights.

[47]  Changiz Eslahchi,et al.  PROSIGN: A method for protein secondary structure assignment based on three-dimensional coordinates of consecutive Calpha atoms , 2008, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[48]  Ulrich H. E. Hansmann,et al.  LOCUSTRA: Accurate Prediction of Local Protein Structure Using a Two-Layer Support Vector Machine Approach , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[49]  M Tyagi,et al.  Protein structure mining using a structural alphabet , 2008, Proteins.

[50]  A. Bornot,et al.  Protein contacts, inter-residue interactions and side-chain modelling. , 2008, Biochimie.

[51]  Xiaolong Wang,et al.  Methods for optimizing the structure alphabet sequences of proteins , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[52]  M. Tyagi,et al.  Local Protein Structures , 2007 .

[53]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  A reduced amino acid alphabet for understanding and designing protein adaptation to mutation , 2007, European Biophysics Journal.

[54]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  “Pinning strategy”: a novel approach for predicting the backbone structure in terms of protein blocks from sequence , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[55]  C. Lim,et al.  Discovering structural motifs using a structural alphabet: Application to magnesium-binding sites , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[56]  B. Charloteaux,et al.  Prediction of peptide structure: How far are we? , 2006, Proteins.

[57]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  A substitution matrix for structural alphabet based on structural alignment of homologous proteins and its applications , 2006, Proteins.

[58]  Narayanaswamy Srinivasan,et al.  Protein Block Expert (PBE): a web-based protein structure analysis server using a structural alphabet , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[59]  Aurélie Bornot,et al.  Protein beta-turn assignments , 2006, Bioinformation.

[60]  Cristina Benros,et al.  Assessing a novel approach for predicting local 3D protein structures from sequence , 2005, Proteins.

[61]  J. Gibrat,et al.  Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods , 2005, BMC Structural Biology.

[62]  Baldomero Oliva,et al.  Prediction of the conformation and geometry of loops in globular proteins: Testing ArchDB, a structural classification of loops , 2005, Proteins.

[63]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  A structural model of a seven-transmembrane helix receptor: the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokine (DARC). , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[64]  C. Etchebest,et al.  A structural alphabet for local protein structures: Improved prediction methods , 2005, Proteins.

[65]  Alexandre G. de Brevern,et al.  New assessment of a structural alphabet , 2005, Silico Biol..

[66]  Jean-François Sadoc,et al.  Protein secondary structure assignment through Voronoï tessellation , 2004, Proteins.

[67]  Alexandre G. de Brevern,et al.  Use of a structural alphabet for analysis of short loops connecting repetitive structures , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[68]  Patrice Koehl,et al.  The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004 , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[69]  David Eisenberg,et al.  The discovery of the α-helix and β-sheet, the principal structural features of proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  K. Karplus,et al.  Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: Alphabets of backbone geometry , 2003, Proteins.

[71]  A. G. Brevern,et al.  'Hybrid Protein Model' for optimally defining 3D protein structure fragments , 2003, Bioinform..

[72]  P. Chakrabarti,et al.  Sequence and structure patterns in proteins from an analysis of the shortest helices: implications for helix nucleation. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  D. Eisenberg The discovery of the alpha-helix and beta-sheet, the principal structural features of proteins. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  If.,et al.  Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of three linked peptide units , 1968, Biopolymers.

[75]  H. Valadié,et al.  Extension of a local backbone description using a structural alphabet: A new approach to the sequence‐structure relationship , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[76]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  Variants of 310‐helices in proteins , 2002 .

[77]  P. Chakrabarti,et al.  Variants of 3(10)-helices in proteins. , 2002, Proteins.

[78]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  Protein structural alphabets: beyond the secondary structure description , 2001 .

[79]  A. D. Brevern Nouvelles stratégies d'analyses et de prédiction des structures tridimensionnelles des protéines , 2001 .

[80]  C. Etchebest,et al.  Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks , 2000, Proteins.

[81]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[82]  L. Pal,et al.  Novel protein structural motifs containing two-turn and longer 3(10)-helices. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[83]  T Darden,et al.  New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations. , 1999, Structure.

[84]  T. Creamer Left‐handed polyproline II helix formation is (very) locally driven , 1998, Proteins.

[85]  R. Aurora,et al.  Helix capping , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[86]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[87]  Joël Pothier,et al.  P-SEA: a new efficient assignment of secondary structure from C alpha trace of proteins , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[88]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROMOTIF—A program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[89]  Alan E. Mark,et al.  The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide , 1996 .

[90]  P. Argos,et al.  Knowledge‐based protein secondary structure assignment , 1995, Proteins.

[91]  N. Colloc'h,et al.  Comparison of three algorithms for the assignment of secondary structure in proteins: the advantages of a consensus assignment. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[92]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Left-handed polyproline II helices commonly occur in globular proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[93]  S. Wodak,et al.  Relations between protein sequence and structure and their significance. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[94]  J L Sussman,et al.  A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins , 1989, Proteins.

[95]  R. Lavery,et al.  Describing protein structure: A general algorithm yielding complete helicoidal parameters and a unique overall axis , 1989, Proteins.

[96]  J. Richardson,et al.  Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. , 1988, Science.

[97]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[98]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[99]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 25. Solvation and conformation of methanol in water , 1983 .

[100]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .

[101]  J. Richardson,et al.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. , 1981, Advances in protein chemistry.

[102]  W. L. Jorgensen Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 3. Deriving intermolecular potential functions for the water dimer from ab initio calculations , 1979 .

[103]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[104]  M. Levitt,et al.  Automatic identification of secondary structure in globular proteins. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[105]  C. Venkatachalam Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of three linked peptide units , 1968, Biopolymers.

[106]  J. Donohue,et al.  Hydrogen Bonded Helical Configurations of the Polypeptide Chain. , 1953, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[107]  L. Pauling,et al.  The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[108]  L. Pauling,et al.  The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[109]  W. T. ASTBURY,et al.  Structure of Proteins , 1939, Nature.