Nonlinear seismic response of steel structures with semi-rigid and composite connections

Abstract The nonlinear seismic responses of steel frames with fully restrained, partially restrained and composite connections are evaluated and compared in terms of the maximum interstory and maximum top lateral displacements. Steel frames are usually analyzed assuming all the connections are fully restrained. However, considering the practical design aspects of connections, this is rarely true. This practice introduces unintended flexibility in the frame. Using a nonlinear time domain seismic analysis algorithm developed by the authors, three steel frames are excited by 13 earthquake time histories. Twelve of them were recorded during the Northridge earthquake of 1994. Any one of these 12 earthquake time histories can be used to represent the Northridge earthquake in future designs. To define the rigidity of a connection, a parameter called the T ratio is introduced. It is the ratio of the moment the connection would have to carry according to the beam line theory and the fixed end moment of the girder. Initially, the T ratio of all the connections is assumed to be 0.9, making them fully restrained. The results indicate that this assumption is inappropriate and gives unconservative responses depending upon which time history of the same earthquake is being used. Several frames with a T ratio of 0.95 developed very large lateral displacements causing instability, although they behaved properly when the ratio was assumed to be 1.0. For composite connections, slab steel has a significant beneficial effect on the overall structural response. It increases the T ratio, making it closer to the FR connection. Even for composite connections with a T ratio of 0.95, the frames developed large lateral displacement. Further parametric study indicates that, at least for seismic analysis, PR or composite connections should be designed for a T ratio as close to 1 as possible to represent an FR connection. Otherwise, the lateral displacement failure criterion should also be checked for less than ideal FR connection conditions. Improvements in both the analysis and design of steel frames are necessary to make them more seismic load tolerant.

[1]  Zia Razzaq End Restraint Effect on Steel Column Strength , 1983 .

[2]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  ELASTO-PLASTIC LARGE DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF SPACE-FRAMES: A PLASTIC-HINGE AND STRESS-BASED EXPLICIT DERIVATION OF TANGENT STIFFNESSES , 1988 .

[3]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Elasto-plastic large deformation analysis of PR steel frames for LRFD , 1989 .

[4]  M. John Frye,et al.  Analysis of Flexibly Connected Steel Frames , 1975 .

[5]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Space Structures with Partially Restrained Cnnections. , 1995 .

[6]  S. Atluri,et al.  Large-deformation, elasto-plastic analysis of frames under nonconservative loading, using explicitly derived tangent stiffnesses based on assumed stresses , 1987 .

[7]  Reidar Bjorhovde,et al.  Classification System for Beam‐to‐Column Connections , 1990 .

[8]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[9]  조효남,et al.  Load & Resistance Factor Design - AISC , Manual of Steel Construction , 2nd Edition - , 1995 .

[10]  Basil Sourochnikoff Closure of "Wind Stresses in Semi-Rigid Connections of Steel Framework" , 1950 .

[11]  Maher Kh. El-Salti Design of frames with partially restrained connections. , 1992 .

[12]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[13]  Eric M. Lui,et al.  Effects of connection flexibility and panel zone deformation on the behavior of plane steel frames , 1985 .

[14]  Ralph M. Richard,et al.  Versatile Elastic-Plastic Stress-Strain Formula , 1975 .

[15]  Yiguang. Zhou Efficient stochastic finite element method for the reliability analysis of nonlinear frame structures. , 1992 .

[16]  Eric M. Lui,et al.  Effects of joint flexibility on the behavior of steel frames , 1987 .

[17]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Finite elements in plasticity—theory and practice, D. R. J. Owen and E. Hinton, Pineridge Press, Swansea , 1981 .

[18]  André Colson,et al.  Theoretical modeling of semirigid connections behavior , 1991 .

[19]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  General Behavior of WF Steel Shear Link Beams , 1986 .