EMAP-Surface Waters: a multiassemblage, probability survey of ecological integrity in the U.S.A.

Data analyzed at national, multistate or state scales often reveal more serious deterioration of various biological assemblages than that suspected from site specific studies simply because the impacts are observed regionally rather than locally. Unfortunately many regional assessments are based on data collected with differing sampling designs and methods, making their representativeness, accuracy and precision questionable. In 1989, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) began EMAP-Surface Waters (EMAP-SW), a program for developing methods to monitor and assess status and trends in the nation's lakes and rivers in a statistically and ecologically rigorous manner. EMAP-SW has now conducted regional multistate pilots in streams and rivers throughout the U.S.A. in collaboration with State agencies, universities and EPA regional offices. We discuss EMAP's conceptual design, which focuses on biological integrity through use of multiple biological assemblages and includes physical and chemical habitat and landscape characteristics. When coupled with appropriate biological indicators, a probability-based design enabled us to provide accurate, precise and unbiased assessments of biological conditions, along with quantitative estimates of sampling uncertainty. Regional EMAP-SW surveys indicated the importance of assessing multiple biological assemblages because each assemblage was differentially sensitive to different stressors and at different spatial scales. Synthesizing multiple metrics from multiple assemblages allowed us to detect the effects of multiple anthropogenic disturbances. We also illustrate the value of using historical reconstruction and paleolimnological data for determining reference conditions where disturbance is extensive. We conclude that an EMAP approach to sampling design and indicators (recognizing natural ecoregional differences) has distinct advantages for monitoring and assessments that may be applicable to European Communities seeking to assess the ecological integrity of waters.

[1]  Don E. McAllister,et al.  Fishes of North America Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern: 1989 , 1979 .

[2]  James R. Karr,et al.  Regional Application of an Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Stream Fish Communities , 1984 .

[3]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data , 1984 .

[4]  E. Helmer,et al.  Effects of chlorine and ammoniac from wastewater treatment facilities on biotic integrity , 1985 .

[5]  D. Landers,et al.  Eastern lake survey, regional estimates of lake chemistry. , 1988, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. Eilers,et al.  Characteristics of lakes in mountainous areas of the western United States (journal version) , 1988 .

[7]  G. Petts.  Historical analysis of fluvial hydrosystems , 1989 .

[8]  James D. Williams,et al.  Extinctions of North American Fishes During the past Century , 1989 .

[9]  J. Karr.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  A. Herlihy,et al.  Acidic Lakes and Streams in the United States: The Role of Acidic Deposition , 1991, Science.

[11]  A. Herlihy,et al.  Stream chemistry in the eastern United States: 1. Synoptic survey design, acid‐base status, and regional patterns , 1991 .

[12]  Robert P. Brooks,et al.  Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas , 1991 .

[13]  W. Scott Overton,et al.  An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends , 1991, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[14]  John P. Smol,et al.  Diatoms : powerful indicators of environmental change , 1992 .

[15]  Denis White,et al.  Cartographic and Geometric Components of a Global Sampling Design for Environmental Monitoring , 1992 .

[16]  John P. Smol,et al.  Paleolimnology: an important tool for effective ecosystem management , 1992 .

[17]  Robert M. Hughes,et al.  Biological Diversity and Biological Integrity: Current Concerns for Lakes and Streams , 1992 .

[18]  Alexander S. Flecker,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in running waters , 1993 .

[19]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  Implementation of a National Monitoring Program , 1994 .

[20]  B. Statzner,et al.  The synthesis of long-term ecological research in the context of concurrently developed ecological theory: design of a research strategy for the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[21]  J. Smol,et al.  Diatoms as indicators in the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters (EMAP-SW) , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[22]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  REGIONAL SCALE TREND MONITORING OF INDICATORS OF TROPHIC CONDITION OF LAKES , 1995 .

[23]  Jean-François Guégan,et al.  Global scale patterns of fish species richness in rivers , 1995 .

[24]  R. Hughes.  Do We Need Institutional Change , 1997 .

[25]  Danny C. Lee,et al.  Distribution and status of seven native salmonids in the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the Klamath River and Great basins , 1997 .

[26]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  VARIABLE DENSITY GRID‐BASED SAMPLING DESIGNS FOR CONTINUOUS SPATIAL POPULATIONS , 1997 .

[27]  Biology, probability, and the obvious , 1997 .

[28]  S. Paulsen,et al.  Cyprinid distributions in Northeast U.S.A. lakes: evidence of regional-scale minnow biodiversity losses , 1997 .

[29]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  CRITICAL ELEMENTS IN DESCRIBING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR NATION'S AQUATIC RESOURCES1 , 1998 .

[30]  P. J. Raven,et al.  River habitat quality : the physical character of rivers and streams in the UK and Isle of Man , 1998 .

[31]  G. Helfman,et al.  Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Chris O. Yoder,et al.  The Role of Biological Indicators in a State Water Quality Management Process , 1998 .

[33]  K. Sahr,et al.  Discrete Global Grid Systems , 1998 .

[34]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  MONITORING FOR POLICY-RELEVANT REGIONALTRENDS OVER TIME , 1998 .

[35]  J. Lazorchak,et al.  Elemental fish tissue contamination in Northeastern U.S. Lakes: Evaluation of an approach to regional assessment , 1998 .

[36]  R. Hughes,et al.  A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity , 1998 .

[37]  Conservation of natural resources , 1999 .

[38]  R. Hughes,et al.  ASSESSING RELATIVE RISKS TO AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS: A MID‐APPALACHIAN CASE STUDY 1 , 1999 .

[39]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  Assessing water quality changes in the lakes of the northeastern United States using sediment diatoms , 1999 .

[40]  B. Hill,et al.  SPATIAL PATTERNS AND ECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF BENTHIC ALGAL ASSEMBLAGES IN MID‐ATLANTIC STREAMS, USA , 1999 .

[41]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Concordance of taxonomic composition patterns across multiple lake assemblages: effects of scale, body size, and land use , 1999 .

[42]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Concordance of taxonomic richness patterns across multiple assemblages in lakes of the northeastern United States , 1999 .

[43]  Denis White,et al.  Environmental correlates of species richness for native freshwater fish in Oregon, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[44]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  Spatially restricted surveys over time for aquatic resources , 1999 .

[45]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Using Multiple Taxonomic Groups to Index the Ecological Condition of Lakes , 2000 .

[46]  Robert M. Hughes,et al.  Classification strengths of ecoregions, catchments, and geographic clusters for aquatic vertebrates in Oregon , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[47]  M. Schwarz,et al.  Identification of rivers with high and good habitat quality: methodological approach and applications in Austria , 2000, Hydrobiologia.