Supplier Involvement In Customer New Product Development: New Insights From The Supplier'S Perspective

This paper presents the results from an empirical survey of chemical suppliers, which examines the influence of customer relationship functions on supplier involvement in customer new product development (NPD) from the supplier's perspective. Using multiple regression analysis, we can demonstrate a positive influence between the direct functions (e.g., profit, volume) of customer relationship and supplier involvement in customer NPD. Differentiating between innovative and non-innovative suppliers leads to distinctive differences. While the direct functions are a strong predictor for the supplier involvement in the non-innovative supplier group, in the innovative group only indirect functions (innovation, market, scout and access functions) influence the supplier involvement. These results show that mutual support in the NPD and open network are the imperative triggers for the involvement of innovative suppliers. The obtained results provide theoretical as well as practical implications for the supplier involvement in customer NPD.

[1]  R. Abratt,et al.  Determinants of product innovation in speciality chemical companies , 1993 .

[2]  P. Ritala,et al.  What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition , 2009 .

[3]  James C. Anderson,et al.  The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis , 1984 .

[4]  M. Montoya-Weiss,et al.  Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products , 1998 .

[5]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Early supplier involvement in the design process: lessons from the electronics industry , 2004 .

[6]  R. Bagozzi.  Principles of marketing research , 1994 .

[7]  Alden S. Bean,et al.  Meet Your Competition: Results from the 1994 IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey , 1996 .

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  C. Grönroos,et al.  The value concept and relationship marketing , 1996 .

[10]  M. Hosein Fallah,et al.  Global innovation performance: Strategic challenges for multinational corporations , 2008 .

[11]  Volker Bilgram,et al.  User-Centric Innovations in New Product Development - Systematic Identification of Lead Users Harnes , 2008 .

[12]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  A. Petroni,et al.  Innovation as a determinant of suppliers’ roles and performances: an empirical study in the food machinery industry , 2002 .

[14]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms , 1997 .

[15]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality , 2003 .

[16]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study , 2006 .

[17]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[18]  Sanjay Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting new product success: Cross-country comparisons☆ , 1996 .

[19]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[20]  Douglas W. LaBahn,et al.  Early Supplier Involvement In Customer New Product Development: A Contingency Model Of Component Supplier Intentions , 2000 .

[21]  Alberto De Toni,et al.  A method for the evaluation of suppliers’ co-design effort , 2001 .

[22]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers , 2006 .

[23]  Jens Leker,et al.  Radical or not? Assessing innovativeness and its organisational implications for established firms , 2006 .

[24]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[25]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[26]  T. Johnsen.  Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: Taking stock and looking to the future , 2009 .

[27]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: an Italian Case Study , 1994 .

[28]  Emilio Esposito,et al.  The evolution of supply chain relationships: An interpretative framework based on the Italian inter-industry experience , 2009 .

[29]  Rajan R. Kamath,et al.  Managing the buyer-supplier interface for on-time performance in product development , 1997 .

[30]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[31]  Tony C. Garrett,et al.  Success through customer-driven new product development: A comparison of U.S. and New Zealand small entrepreneurial high technology firms , 1997 .

[32]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  What separates Japanese new product winners from losers , 1996 .

[33]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[34]  C. Benedetto.  Identifying the key success factors in new product launch , 1999 .

[35]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[36]  B. Verworn.  A structural equation model of the impact of the “fuzzy front end” on the success of new product development , 2009 .

[37]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[38]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[39]  S. Purchase,et al.  Supplier perceived value: Differences between business-to-business and business-to-government relationships , 2009 .

[40]  Michael Song,et al.  Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures , 2008 .

[41]  Holger Schiele.  How to distinguish innovative suppliers? Identifying innovative suppliers as new task for purchasing , 2006 .

[42]  Arun Sharma,et al.  Supplier relationships: Emerging issues and challenges , 1997 .

[43]  Jaehoon Rhee,et al.  Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation , 2010 .

[44]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Value Creation in Buyer–Seller Relationships: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results from a Supplier's Perspective , 2001 .

[45]  Jens Leker,et al.  Der Einfluss von Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken auf das Innovationsmanagement der chemischen Industrie , 2003 .

[46]  T. Nishiguchi,et al.  Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage , 1994 .

[47]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Innovation and Product Development Strategies in the Italian Motorcycle Industry , 1996 .

[48]  U. Lichtenthaler.  RETRACTED: Externally commercializing technology assets: An examination of different process stages , 2008 .

[49]  Herwig Mehrwald,et al.  Das ‘Not Invented Here‚-Syndrom in Forschung und Entwicklung , 1999 .

[50]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[51]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[52]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study , 2006 .

[53]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[54]  Stephan M. Wagner.  Supplier traits for better customer firm innovation performance , 2010 .

[55]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[56]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[57]  Kun-Tzu Yu,et al.  Enhancing the efficacy of supplier selection decision-making on the initial stage of new product development: A hybrid fuzzy approach considering the strategic and operational factors simultaneously , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[58]  Jon-Arild Johannessen,et al.  The future of value creation and innovations: Aspects of a theory of value creation and innovation in a global knowledge economy , 2010 .

[59]  M. Primo,et al.  An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes , 2002 .

[60]  Dawn Iacobucci.  Classic Factor Analysis , 1994 .

[61]  R. Cooper,et al.  Major new products: What distinguishes the winners in the chemical industry? , 1993 .

[62]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[63]  J. Liker,et al.  Risky Business or Competitive Power? Supplier Involvement in Japanese Product Design , 1997 .

[64]  A. Walter,et al.  Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development , 2003 .

[65]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[66]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  User initiated product innovations , 1989 .

[67]  Jens Leker,et al.  Marketing in der chemischen Industrie , 2004 .

[68]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .