Stand structure, fuel loads, and fire behavior in riparian and upland forests, Sierra Nevada Mountains, USA; a comparison of current and reconstructed conditions

Abstract Fire plays an important role in shaping many Sierran coniferous forests, but longer fire return intervals and reductions in area burned have altered forest conditions. Productive, mesic riparian forests can accumulate high stem densities and fuel loads, making them susceptible to high-severity fire. Fuels treatments applied to upland forests, however, are often excluded from riparian areas due to concerns about degrading streamside and aquatic habitat and water quality. Objectives of this study were to compare stand structure, fuel loads, and potential fire behavior between adjacent riparian and upland forests under current and reconstructed active-fire regime conditions. Current fuel loads, tree diameters, heights, and height to live crown were measured in 36 paired riparian and upland plots. Historic estimates of these metrics were reconstructed using equations derived from fuel accumulation rates, current tree data, and increment cores. Fire behavior variables were modeled using Forest Vegetation Simulator Fire/Fuels Extension. Riparian forests were significantly more fire prone under current than reconstructed conditions, with greater basal area (BA) (means are 87 vs. 29 m 2 /ha), stand density (635 vs. 208 stems/ha), snag volume (37 vs. 2 m 3 /ha), duff loads (69 vs. 3 Mg/ha), total fuel loads (93 vs. 28 Mg/ha), canopy bulk density (CBD) (0.12 vs. 0.04 kg/m 3 ), surface flame length (0.6 vs. 0.4 m), crown flame length (0.9 vs. 0.4 m), probability of torching (0.45 vs. 0.03), predicted mortality (31% vs. 17% BA), and lower torching (20 vs. 176 km/h) and crowning indices (28 vs. 62 km/h). Upland forests were also significantly more fire prone under current than reconstructed conditions, yet changes in fuels and potential fire behavior were not as large. Under current conditions, riparian forests were significantly more fire prone than upland forests, with greater stand density (635 vs. 401 stems/ha), probability of torching (0.45 vs. 0.22), predicted mortality (31% vs. 16% BA), and lower quadratic mean diameter (46 vs. 55 cm), canopy base height (6.7 vs. 9.4 m), and frequency of fire tolerant species (13% vs. 36% BA). Reconstructed riparian and upland forests were not significantly different. Our reconstruction results suggest that historic fuels and forest structure may not have differed significantly between many riparian and upland forests, consistent with earlier research suggesting similar historic fire return intervals. Under current conditions, however, modeled severity is much greater in riparian forests, suggesting forest habitat and ecosystem function may be more severely impacted by wildfire than in upland forests.

[1]  Paul F. Hessburg,et al.  Historical and current forest landscapes in Eastern Oregon and Washington. Part 2. linking vegetation characteristics to potential fire behavior and related smoke production , 1995 .

[2]  J. Bouldin Twentieth Century Changes in Forests of the Sierra Nevada Mountains , 1999 .

[3]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  User's guide to the stand prognosis model / , 1982 .

[4]  J. B. Leiberg Forest Conditions in the Northern Sierra Nevada, California , 2009 .

[5]  D. Murphy,et al.  Lake Tahoe watershed assessment: volume I , 2000 .

[6]  Kathleen A. Dwire,et al.  Fire and riparian ecosystems in landscapes of the western USA , 2003 .

[7]  M. Morrison,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of Snags. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  J. Agee The landscape ecology of western forest fire regimes , 1998 .

[9]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  Landscape-scale changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behaviour following ponderosa pine restoration treatments , 2008 .

[10]  David J. Parsons,et al.  Impact of fire suppression on a mixed-conifer forest , 1979 .

[11]  William C. McComb,et al.  Streamside versus upslope breeding bird communities in the central Oregon coast range , 1992 .

[12]  M. North,et al.  Canopy microclimate response to pattern and density of thinning in a Sierra Nevada forest , 2009 .

[13]  M. North,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variability of Canopy Microclimate in a Sierra Nevada Riparian Forest , 2008 .

[14]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Approximating Nature's Variation: Selecting and Using Reference Information in Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[15]  S. Stephens,et al.  Forest structure and mortality in an old-growth Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest in north-western Mexico , 2005 .

[16]  C. Oliver,et al.  Forest stand dynamics: updated edition. , 1996 .

[17]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Comparison of Historical and Contemporary Forest Structure and Composition on Permanent Plots in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests , 2004 .

[18]  James K. Brown Handbook for inventorying downed woody material , 1974 .

[19]  C. Millar,et al.  THE ROLE OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN INTERPRETING HISTORICAL VARIABILITY , 1999 .

[20]  P. Fulé,et al.  FIRE REGIMES AND FOREST STRUCTURE IN THE SIERRA MADRE OCCIDENTAL, DURANGO, MEXICO , 1997 .

[21]  D. Kreutzweiser,et al.  Operational and economic feasibility of logging within forested riparian zones. , 2010 .

[22]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Predicting late-successional fire refugia pre-dating European settlement in the Wenatchee Mountains , 1997 .

[23]  A. Symstad,et al.  Fire and forest history at Mount Rushmore. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  M. Stokes,et al.  An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating , 1996 .

[25]  Peter Z. Fulé,et al.  Comparing ecological restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, Arizona , 2002 .

[26]  M. North,et al.  Fire history of coniferous riparian forests in the Sierra Nevada , 2010 .

[27]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Water In Environmental Planning , 1978 .

[28]  James K. Agee,et al.  Fire and Fuel Dynamics of Sierra Nevada Conifers , 1976 .

[29]  M. M. Moore,et al.  RESTORATION OF PRESETTLEMENT AGE STRUCTURE OF AN ARIZONA PONDEROSA PINE FOREST , 1999 .

[30]  R. Keane Biophysical controls on surface fuel litterfall and decomposition in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA , 2008 .

[31]  Robert J. Naiman,et al.  Fire in the Riparian Zone: Characteristics and Ecological Consequences , 2007, Ecosystems.

[32]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA , 2008 .

[33]  M. Savage The role of anthropogenic influences in a mixed-conifer forest mortality episode , 1997 .

[34]  A. Taylor IDENTIFYING FOREST REFERENCE CONDITIONS ON EARLY CUT‐OVER LANDS, LAKE TAHOE BASIN, USA , 2004 .

[35]  Michael C. Wimberly,et al.  Influences of environment and disturbance on forest patterns in coastal oregon watersheds , 2001 .

[36]  G. Segura,et al.  Stand dynamics and regeneration patterns of a pinyon pine forest in east central Mexico , 1992 .

[37]  H. Safford,et al.  Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity in an area of wildland-urban interface, Angora Fire, Lake Tahoe Basin, California , 2009 .

[38]  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem,et al.  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project final report to Congress , 1997 .

[39]  D. Hibbs,et al.  A characterization of unmanaged riparian areas in the central Coast Range of western Oregon , 2000 .

[40]  J. Pierce,et al.  Fire-induced erosion and millennial-scale climate change in northern ponderosa pine forests , 2004, Nature.

[41]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest , 2005 .

[42]  J. Wagtendonk,et al.  Fuel deposition rates of montane and subalpine conifers in the central Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2010 .

[43]  Erin McCormick,et al.  FireFamily Plus user's guide, Version 2.0 , 2000 .

[44]  J. Franklin,et al.  Impact of a high-intensity fire on mixed evergreen and mixed conifer forests in the Peninsular Ranges of southern California, USA , 2006 .

[45]  D. Rizzo,et al.  Present and past old-growth forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin, Sierra Nevada, US , 2002 .

[46]  N. Poage Comparison of stand development of a deciduous-dominated riparian forest and a coniferous-dominated riparian forest in the Oregon Coast Range , 1994 .

[47]  Mark E. Harmon,et al.  Coarse woody debris in mixed-conifer forests, Sequoia National Park, California , 1987 .

[48]  C. Skinner,et al.  Fire regimes, past and present , 1996 .

[49]  M. Finney,et al.  Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species: effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion , 2002 .

[50]  M. North,et al.  Effect of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments on woody debris and snag dynamics in a Sierran old-growth, mixed-conifer forest , 2006 .

[51]  G. B. Sudworth Stanislaus and Lake Tahoe Forest Reserves, California, and adjacent territory , 1900 .

[52]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[53]  Dan Taylor,et al.  FIRE HISTORY OF A SEQUOIA-MIXED CONIFER FOREST' , 1979 .

[54]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior 1880-2040: Grand Canyon, Arizona , 2004 .

[55]  S. Stephens,et al.  Wildfire and Spatial Patterns in Forests in Northwestern Mexico: The United States Wishes It Had Similar Fire Problems , 2008 .

[56]  M. M. Moore,et al.  DETERMINING REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS , 1997 .

[57]  S. Fitzgerald Fire ecology of ponderosa pine and the rebuilding of fire-resilient ponderosa pine ecosystems , 2005 .

[58]  Robert J. Pabst,et al.  Structure and composition of unmanaged riparian forests in the coastal mountains of Oregon, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[59]  S. Stephens Fuel loads, snag abundance, and snag recruitment in an unmanaged Jeffrey pine–mixed conifer forest in Northwestern Mexico , 2004 .

[60]  J. McBride,et al.  The relative importance of fire and watercourse proximity in determining stand composition in mixed conifer riparian forests , 2001 .

[61]  J. Ganey Snag density and composition of snag populations on two National Forests in northern Arizona , 1999 .

[62]  G. E. Dixon Essential FVS: A User's Guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator , 2007 .

[63]  L. C. Wensel,et al.  Tip Length Models for Major Commercial California Conifers , 1995 .

[64]  W. Douglass Amerikanuak: Basques In The New World , 1976 .

[65]  K. A. Harper,et al.  Structure and composition of riparian boreal forest: new methods for analyzing edge influence , 2001 .

[66]  D. Hibbs,et al.  Determinants of riparian fire severity in two Oregon fires, USA , 2008 .

[67]  J. L. Vankat Vegetation changes in Sequoia National Park, California , 1978 .

[68]  K. Blatner,et al.  U.S. Forest Service grazing and rangelands , 1985 .

[69]  K. Dwire,et al.  Fuel Reduction Management Practices in Riparian Areas of the Western USA , 2010, Environmental management.

[70]  Lee C. Wensel,et al.  Tree Taper Model Volume Equations: I. Bark Taper Equations for California Conifers , 1995 .

[71]  A. Taylor,et al.  Fire regimes, forest change, and self-organization in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest, Yosemite National Park, USA. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[72]  D. Falk Discovering the Future, Creating the Past: Some Reflections on Restoration , 1990, Restoration & Management Notes.

[73]  Jim InnesJ. Innes,et al.  Comparison of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments to Sierran mixed-conifer historic conditions , 2007 .

[74]  M. Anderson,et al.  Native American land-use practices and ecological impacts , 1996 .

[75]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California's forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands , 2007 .

[76]  A. Taylor,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of fire regimes in a mixed conifer forest landscape, Southern Cascades, California, USA , 2001 .

[77]  Diana L. Olson,et al.  Historical fires in Douglas-fir dominated riparian forests of the southern Cascades, Oregon , 2005 .