Monte Carlo study of substrate-induced folding and refolding of lattice proteins.

Many proteins can switch from one conformation to another under the influence of an external driving force, such as the binding to a specific substrate. Using a simple lattice model we show that it is feasible to design protein-like lattice proteins that can have two different conformations, depending on whether or not they are bound to a substrate. We give three different examples of such substrate-induced refolding. In addition, we have explored substrate-induced folding of lattice proteins that do not fold when free in solution. We show that such proteins can bind with the same high specificity as prefolded protein, but have a considerably lower binding free energy. In this way proteins can bind to a substrate in a way that is highly specific, yet reversible.

[1]  A. Levine,et al.  Induced alpha helix in the VP16 activation domain upon binding to a human TAF. , 1997, Science.

[2]  B. Derrida.  Random-energy model: An exactly solvable model of disordered systems , 1981 .

[3]  Djamal Bouzida,et al.  Simulating disorder–order transitions in molecular recognition of unstructured proteins: Where folding meets binding , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Grosberg,et al.  Design of toy proteins capable of rearranging conformations in a mechanical fashion , 2002, cond-mat/0212124.

[6]  A. Levine,et al.  Induced α Helix in the VP16 Activation Domain upon Binding to a Human TAF , 1997 .

[7]  W. Schief,et al.  Conformational changes during kinesin motility. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[8]  Daan Frenkel,et al.  Virtual-move parallel tempering. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[9]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  A new approach to the design of stable proteins. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[10]  Anders Irbäck,et al.  Coupled folding-binding versus docking: a lattice model study. , 2003, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[13]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  R. Vale,et al.  The way things move: looking under the hood of molecular motor proteins. , 2000, Science.

[15]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D Frenkel,et al.  Designing refoldable model molecules. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  N. Hirokawa,et al.  Kinesin and dynein superfamily proteins and the mechanism of organelle transport. , 1998, Science.

[18]  Daan Frenkel,et al.  Designing specificity of protein-substrate interactions. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.