Morphodynamic assessment of side channel systems using a simple one‐dimensional bifurcation model and a comparison with aerial images

Side channel construction is a common intervention applied to increase a river's conveyance capacity and to increase its ecological value. Past modelling efforts suggest two mechanisms affecting the morphodynamic change of a side channel: (1) a difference in channel slope between the side channel and the main channel and (2) bend flow just upstream of the bifurcation. The objective of this paper was to assess the conditions under which side channels generally aggrade or degrade and to assess the characteristic timescales of the associated morphological change. We use a one-dimensional bifurcation model to predict the development of side channel systems and the characteristic timescale for a wide range of conditions. We then compare these results to multitemporal aerial images of four side channel systems. We consider the following mechanisms at the bifurcation to be important for side channel development: sediment diversion due to the bifurcation angle, sediment diversion due to the transverse bed slope, partitioning of suspended load, mixed sediment processes such as sorting at the bifurcation, bank erosion, deposition due to vegetation, and floodplain sedimentation. There are limitations to using a one-dimensional numerical model as it can only account for these mechanisms in a parametrized manner, but the model reproduces general behaviour of the natural side channels until floodplain-forming processes become important. The main result is a set of stability diagrams with key model parameters that can be used to assess the development of a side channel system and the associated timescale, which will aid in the future design and maintenance of side channel systems.

[1]  E. Mosselman,et al.  Effects of helical flow in one‐dimensional modelling of sediment distribution at river bifurcations , 2013 .

[2]  P. Atkinson,et al.  One-dimensional modeling of a recent Ganga avulsion: Assessing the potential effect of tectonic subsidence on a large river , 2014 .

[3]  K. Riad.  Analytical and experimental study of bed load distribution at alluvial diversions , 1961 .

[4]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Bed Load Transport in a River Meander , 1984 .

[5]  C. P. Henry,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: II. An example in a former channel of the Rhône River , 1995 .

[6]  J. Abad,et al.  Planform dynamics of the Iquitos anabranching structure in the Peruvian Upper Amazon River , 2016 .

[7]  H. Habersack,et al.  Morphodynamic river processes and techniques for assessment of channel evolution in Alpine gravel bed rivers , 2007 .

[8]  F. Engelund,et al.  A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams , 1967 .

[9]  H. D. Vriend,et al.  Bed deformation in curved alluvial channels , 1985 .

[10]  Christian Baumgartner,et al.  Restoration of floodplain rivers: The ‘Danube restoration project’ , 1999 .

[11]  H. Piégay,et al.  Overbank sedimentation rates in former channel lakes: characterization and control factors , 2009 .

[12]  H. Piégay,et al.  The role of oxbow lakes in the off-channel storage of bed material along the Ain River, France , 2013 .

[13]  J. Zinger.  From meander bend to oxbow lake: morphodynamics and sedimentology of chute cutoffs , 2016 .

[14]  R. E. Grift,et al.  MAN-MADE SECONDARY CHANNELS ALONG THE RIVER RHINE (THE NETHERLANDS); RESULTS OF POST-PROJECT MONITORING , 2001 .

[15]  J. Best,et al.  Extreme sediment pulses generated by bend cutoffs along a large meandering river , 2011 .

[16]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  Evolution of a bifurcation in a meandering river with adjustable channel widths, Rhine delta apex, The Netherlands , 2011 .

[17]  T. Geertsema,et al.  Distributary channels in the fluvial to tidal transition zone , 2017 .

[18]  E. Mosselman,et al.  Bifurcation modelling in a meandering gravel–sand bed river , 2012 .

[19]  Marcelo H. García,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical modeling of the Bulle effect: the nonlinear distribution of near‐bed sediment at fluvial diversions , 2017 .

[20]  H. Middelkoop,et al.  Distinct patterns of interaction between vegetation and morphodynamics , 2016 .

[21]  E. Meselhe,et al.  Evaluation of Sediment Diversion Design Attributes and Their Impact on the Capture Efficiency , 2016 .

[22]  Norman D. Smith,et al.  RIVER AVULSIONS AND THEIR DEPOSITS , 2004 .

[23]  A. M. Talmon,et al.  Laboratory measurements of the direction of sediment transport on transverse alluvial-bed slopes , 1995 .

[24]  Derald G. Smith,et al.  Avulsions, channel evolution and floodplain sedimentation rates of the anastomosing upper Columbia River, British Columbia, Canada , 2002 .

[25]  D. Edmonds,et al.  Stability of delta distributary networks and their bifurcations , 2008 .

[26]  T. Dunne,et al.  Controls on the alluviation of oxbow lakes by bed‐material load along the Sacramento River, California , 2010 .

[27]  W. Bertoldi,et al.  River bifurcations: Experimental observations on equilibrium configurations , 2007 .

[28]  S. Lane,et al.  Splitting rivers at their seams: bifurcations and avulsion , 2013 .

[29]  S. Rodrigues,et al.  Flow and sediment dynamics in the vegetated secondary channels of an anabranching river: The Loire River (France) , 2006 .

[30]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Conservation by restoration: the management concept for a river-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria , 1998 .

[31]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Effects of River Restoration on Riparian Biodiversity in Secondary Channels of the Pite River, Sweden , 2011, Environmental Management.

[32]  J. Best,et al.  Flow structure and channel morphodynamics of meander bend chute cutoffs: A case study of the Wabash River, USA , 2013 .

[33]  H. Piégay,et al.  Morphodynamics of the exit of a cutoff meander: experimental findings from field and laboratory studies , 2010 .

[34]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  A unified framework for stability of channel bifurcations in gravel and sand fluvial systems , 2015 .

[35]  K. Konsoer.  Influence of riparian vegetation on near-bank flow structure and rates of erosion on a large meandering river , 2014 .

[36]  M. Church.  BED MATERIAL TRANSPORT AND THE MORPHOLOGY OF ALLUVIAL RIVER CHANNELS , 2006 .

[37]  H. D. Vriend,et al.  Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  R. Hardy,et al.  Flow structures at an idealized bifurcation: a numerical experiment , 2011 .

[39]  A. Rollet.  Etude et gestion de la dynamique sédimentaire d'un tronçon fluvial à l'aval d'un barrage : le cas de la basse vallée de l'Ain , 2007 .

[40]  Robbert Fokkink,et al.  Stability of river bifurcations in ID morphodynamic models , 1995 .

[41]  Maarten G. Kleinhans,et al.  Complex variations in sediment transport at three large river bifurcations during discharge waves in the river Rhine , 2008 .

[42]  Rudy Slingerland,et al.  Necessary conditions for a meandering-river avulsion , 1998 .

[43]  T. Dunne,et al.  Modeling decadal bed material sediment flux based on stochastic hydrology , 2004 .

[44]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics and avulsion duration in meandering rivers by one‐dimensional and three‐dimensional models , 2008 .

[45]  V. Babovic,et al.  On inducing equations for vegetation resistance , 2007 .

[46]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  Chapter 7 – The Rhône River Basin , 2009 .

[47]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  Bifurcation instability and chute cutoff development in meandering gravel-bed rivers , 2014 .

[48]  J. H. Berg.  Prediction of alluvial channel pattern of perennial rivers , 1995 .

[49]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  Sedimentary architecture of abandoned channel fills , 2012 .

[50]  Marco Tubino,et al.  A one-dimensional model of bifurcations in gravel bed channels with erodible banks , 2006 .