Statistical Distributions of Discrete Walsh Hadamard Transform Coefficients of Natural Images

For low bit rate applications, the discrete Walsh Hadamard transform (WHT) shows almost comparable results when compared to the popular discrete Cosine transform (DCT) in terms of compression efficiency, peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and visual results. The discrete WHT is a best choice which compromises between the computational complexity and compression efficiency. The great advantage of the discrete WHT is its relatively very low computational complexity when compared to DCT. However there is no definitive study reported in literature regarding the statistical distributions of discrete WHT coefficients of natural images. This study performs a 2 χ goodness of fit test to determine the distribution that best fits the discrete WHT coefficients. The simulation results show that the distribution of a majority of the significant AC coefficients can be modelled by the Generalized Gaussian distribution. The knowledge of the appropriate distribution helps in design of optimal quantizers that may lead to minimum distortion and hence achieve optimal coding efficiency.

[1]  F. Muller Distribution shape of two-dimensional DCT coefficients of natural images , 1993 .

[2]  N. Ahmed,et al.  Discrete Cosine Transform , 1996 .

[3]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .

[4]  Boon Poh Ng,et al.  A new transform for document image compression , 2009, 2009 7th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS).

[5]  K. H. Barratt Digital Coding of Waveforms , 1985 .

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Ali N. Akansu,et al.  Discrete Walsh-Hadamard transform vector quantization for motion-compensated frame difference signal coding , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[8]  Jean-Luc Nagel,et al.  A low-complexity video coder based on the Discrete Walsh Hadamard Transform , 2000, 2000 10th European Signal Processing Conference.

[9]  Konstantinos Konstantinides,et al.  Image and Video Compression Standards: Algorithms and Architectures , 1997 .

[10]  Mandyam D. Srinath,et al.  Statistical distributions of image DCT coefficients , 1986 .

[11]  Thomas R. Fischer,et al.  Comparison of generalized Gaussian and Laplacian modeling in DCT image coding , 1995, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Peter No,et al.  Digital Coding of Waveforms , 1986 .

[13]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Estimation of shape parameter for generalized Gaussian distributions in subband decompositions of video , 1995, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[14]  V. Rohatgi,et al.  An introduction to probability and statistics , 1968 .

[15]  Jerry D. Gibson,et al.  Distributions of the Two-Dimensional DCT Coefficients for Images , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..