Shoe-surface friction in tennis: influence on plantar pressure and implications for injury

Purpose. The different strategies employed by tennis players as a result of changes in friction properties of the playing surface are likely to influence injury incidence. Lower risk of injuries on surfaces that allow sliding has been reported. The aim of the present study was to characterise in-shoe pressure during tennis specific movements performed on a hard court and artificial clay in two surface-specific shoes.Methods. Two tennis surfaces were compared: artificial clay and cushioned acrylic hard court. Participants wore two different pairs of court-specific shoes on each surface. Seven (five males, two females) competitive tennis players performed three movements - open stance forehand, forehand plant (incorporated into a drill) and side jump. In-shoe plantar pressure distribution was recorded using the Pedar (Novel, Munich) insole system.Results. Significantly lower mean and peak pressure were measured during the side jump and running forehand plant on clay compared to hard court. Running forehand plant on artificial clay was characterised by a longer step duration and larger number of unloading episodes than on acrylic. Footwear did not influence peak pressures.Conclusions. A change in surface has a greater effect on plantar pressures than a change in shoe. The higher pressures on a hard court support an association for increased levels of overuse injuries. On clay, limiting areas of high pressure and a longer braking step could facilitate sliding by preventing sticking. Unloading episodes could also be part of the strategy aiming at sliding on clay. These differences are relevant to understand surface-specific mechanisms of injuries.

[1]  Olivier Girard,et al.  Plantar pressures in the tennis serve , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  B Clegg,et al.  An impact testing device for in situ basecourse evaluation , 1976 .

[3]  H J Stam,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of the Pedar Mobile system in long-term vertical force measurements. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[4]  H J Stam,et al.  Validity of the Pedar Mobile system for vertical force measurement during a seven-hour period. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Traction and lower limb motion during rapid turning on different football turf surfaces , 2011 .

[7]  Michael S Orendurff,et al.  Regional Foot Pressure during Running, Cutting, Jumping, and Landing , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  D. Clement Tibial stress syndrome in athletes , 1974, The Journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Olivier Girard,et al.  Effects of the playing surface on plantar pressures and potential injuries in tennis , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  Brandon Doan,et al.  Interaction of wrestling shoe and competition surface: effects on coefficient of friction with implications for injury. , 2002, Sports biomechanics.

[11]  N Jayanthi,et al.  Tennis injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[12]  N. Jarboe,et al.  Assessment of pedar and F-Scan revisited. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  J. Cunningham,et al.  A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Adrian Lees,et al.  Science and the major racket sports: a review , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  W. Kibler,et al.  Principles of rehabilitation after chronic tendon injuries. , 1992, Clinics in sports medicine.

[16]  V. Stiles,et al.  Biomechanical response to systematic changes in impact interface cushioning properties while performing a tennis-specific movement , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  B M Nigg,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of playing surfaces. , 1987, Journal of sports sciences.

[18]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Influence of Shoe Construction on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Load During Lateral Movements in Tennis , 1986 .

[19]  Matt Carré,et al.  Understanding the influence of surface roughness on the tribological interactions at the shoe–surface interface in tennis , 2012 .

[20]  J L Cunningham,et al.  A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Norbert Henze,et al.  A New Approach to the BHEP Tests for Multivariate Normality , 1997 .

[22]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Common Sports Injuries in Young Tennis Players , 1998, Sports medicine.

[23]  M A Hutson,et al.  Injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle: assessment and treatment. , 1982, British journal of sports medicine.

[24]  J. Dragoo,et al.  The Effect of Playing Surface on Injury Rate , 2010, Sports medicine.

[25]  R. Perkins,et al.  Musculoskeletal injuries in tennis. , 2006, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[26]  B M Nigg,et al.  The Influence of Playing Surfaces on the Load on the Locomotor System and on Football and Tennis Injuries , 1988, Sports medicine.

[27]  W. Kibler,et al.  Fitness evaluations and fitness findings in competitive junior tennis players. , 1988, Clinics in sports medicine.

[28]  Lozano,et al.  The influence of friction on sports surfaces in turning movements , 1999 .

[29]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Sports injuries : mechanisms, prevention, and treatment , 1985 .

[30]  E. Trepman,et al.  Partial Rupture of the Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon in a Tennis Player: A Case Report , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[31]  Matt Carré,et al.  Hybrid Method for Assessing the Performance of Sports Surfaces During Ball Impacts , 2006 .

[32]  M. Safran,et al.  Musculoskeletal injuries in the young tennis player. , 2000, Clinics in sports medicine.