Introducing effective reaction rates to account for the inefficient mixing of the convective boundary layer

The convective boundary layer (CBL) is characterised by narrow vigorous thermals (updraft motions) surrounded by relatively large subsidence motions. In such a flow, reactants are normally segregated and their chemical transformations depend on the ability of atmospheric turbulence to mix them. This process is particularly important when the time-scale of the chemical transformation is similar to the turbulent characteristic time scale. For large atmospheric models, the segregation occurs at scales smaller than the grid length. As a result, instantaneous and homogeneous mixing of the reactants is normally assumed. This paper is aimed at the study of this assumption and to apply a parameterisation of an effective reaction rate accounting for the inefficient mixing due to convective turbulence in the CBL. We simulate a growing CBL with two models that use different physical assumptions. The first one, the so-called mixed-layer model, assumes an instantaneous and homogeneous mixing of the reactants in the boundary layer (BL). The second one, a three-dimensional large eddy simulation (LES) model, explicitly solves atmospheric turbulent motions and describes the heterogeneity of the mixing due to the turbulent characteristics of the CBL. By comparing their results in a simple case, i.e. a second-order chemical reaction, we show that the heterogeneous mixing due to convective turbulence has an important impact on the chemical transformations by slowing down the reaction rate. By introducing effective reaction rates through a parameterisation which accounts for this inefficient mixing, the mixed-layer model results improve significantly. We extend our study to a chemical mechanism that accounts for the ozone formation and depletion in the CBL. We show that the reaction rate can be slowed down or increased depending on whether the reactants are transported in opposite directions or not. We propose coefficients to be used to calculate the effective reaction rates in large-scale or mixed-layer models.

[1]  W. Stockwell,et al.  The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling , 1990 .

[2]  W. Stockwell Effects of turbulence on gas-phase atmospheric chemistry: Calculation of the relationship between time scales for diffusion and chemical reaction , 1995 .

[3]  H. Tennekes,et al.  Parameterization of the Turbulent Energy Budget at the Top of the Daytime Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1977 .

[4]  J. de Vil...-Guerau,et al.  The Chemistry of a Dry Cloud: The Effects of Radiation and Turbulence , 2000 .

[5]  Nonlinearities in the gas phase chemistry of the troposphere: Oscillating concentrations in a simplified mechanism , 1996 .

[6]  I. H. Öğüş,et al.  NATO ASI Series , 1997 .

[7]  P. Duynkerke,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Trade Wind Cumulus Clouds. , 1993 .

[8]  J. Arellano Bridging the gap between atmospheric physics and chemistry in studies of small-scale turbulence , 2003 .

[9]  J. Wyngaard Lectures on the Planetary Boundary Layer , 1983 .

[10]  John C. Wyngaard,et al.  Statistics of Conservative Scalars in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1984 .

[11]  Prakash Karamchandani,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a State-of-the-Science Reactive Plume Model , 2000 .

[12]  Douglas K. Lilly,et al.  Mesoscale meteorology : theories, observations, and models , 1983 .

[13]  A. G. Driedonks,et al.  Models and observations of the growth of the atmospheric boundary layer , 1982 .

[14]  J. Garratt The Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1992 .

[15]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Impact of Skewness and Nonlocal Effects on Scalar and Buoyancy Fluxes in Convective Boundary Layers , 1998 .

[16]  M. Molemaker,et al.  Control of Chemical Reactions by Convective Turbulence in the Boundary Layer , 1998 .

[17]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[18]  J. Herwehe A numerical study of the effects of large eddies on photochemistry in the convective boundary layer , 2000 .

[19]  W. S. Lewellen,et al.  Turbulent Mixing with Chemical Reaction in the Planetary Boundary Layer , 1994 .

[20]  John C. Wyngaard,et al.  Structure of the Planetary Boundary Layer and Implications for its Modeling , 1985 .

[21]  A. Betts Non‐precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization , 1973 .

[22]  P. J. Jonker,et al.  An observational study on the effects of time and space averaging in photochemical models , 1993 .

[23]  Fluxes and (co-)variances of reacting scalars in the convective boundary layer , 2003 .

[24]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Turbulent mixing and the chemical breakdown of isoprene in the atmospheric boundary layer , 2000 .

[25]  P. Sullivan,et al.  A Comparison of Shear- and Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary Layer Flows , 1994 .

[26]  Jan G. Verwer,et al.  Gauss-Seidel Iteration for Stiff ODES from Chemical Kinetics , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[27]  D. Kley Tropospheric Chemistry and Transport , 1997 .

[28]  Chin-Hoh Moeng,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION , 2002 .

[29]  D. Carson,et al.  The development of a dry inversion‐capped convectively unstable boundary layer , 1973 .

[30]  M. Jeroen Molemaker,et al.  Effects of turbulence and heterogeneous emissions on photochemically active species in the convective boundary layer , 2000 .

[31]  H. Tennekes,et al.  A Model for the Dynamics of the Inversion Above a Convective Boundary Layer , 1973 .

[32]  H. Tennekes,et al.  Basic entrainment equations for the atmospheric boundary layer , 1981 .

[33]  P. Mason Large‐eddy simulation: A critical review of the technique , 1994 .

[34]  Ulrich Schumann,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of turbulent diffusion with chemical reactions in the convective boundary layer , 1989 .