Assessing long-term behavioural effects of feeding motivation in group-housed pregnant sows; what, when and how to observe

Abstract Main aim of this study was to elucidate behavioural elements that can be used as a tool to measure satiety in group-housed pregnant sows. In addition, the best time (time of day and time on treatment) and observation method were addressed. In two batches, eight groups of five artificially inseminated nulliparous sows were housed in 17.9 m2 pens with feeding stalls. Sows were fed at 07:30 and 15:00 h and either had access to a restricted amount of a low-fibre diet (R) or an unrestricted amount of a high-fibre diet (40% sugarbeet pulp) during 30 min (S). Behaviour was scored by focal sampling in five 3-week time periods since the start of the treatments, during 1 h after the morning meal and 1 h before the afternoon meal. All behavioural elements, that are potentially influenced by satiety were scored, including, e.g. social behaviours and tail postures. Data were reduced by excluding or combining behavioural states that had a variation coefficient larger than 100 or a mean appearance of less than 1% of the scoring-time in the R-group (pooled data). Remaining (groups of) behavioural elements that differed between treatments (P The states Inactive, Self-directed behaviour (combination of, e.g. Sham-chewing and Teeth-grinding), Substrate-directed behaviour (combination of, e.g. rooting and licking substrates), Standing, Moving and Lying lateral and the events Alert and Biting were selected and differed between treatments. In general, S-sows showed less activity than R-sows. Events did not differ between treatments in most separate periods and were, therefore, excluded from further analysis. Differences between treatments in the selected states were only found in the last four periods. Except for Moving (afternoon only) states differed between treatments both in the morning and the afternoon. Differences in the afternoon were, however, more pronounced. It is concluded that at least Inactive, Self-directed behaviour and Substrate-directed behaviour should be used in future ethological studies on satiety in group-housed pregnant sows. These can be scored by scan sampling. The postures Standing and Lying lateral are interesting as well. Observations from 6 weeks after the start of the dietary treatments are most useful and may be done just after feeding, but also several hours after feeding.

[1]  D. G. M. Wood-Gush,et al.  The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment , 1989 .

[2]  M. Kiley-worthington,et al.  The Tail Movements of Ungulates, Canids and Felids With Particular Reference To Their Causation and Function as Displays , 1976 .

[3]  A. Lawrence,et al.  A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[4]  E. Vestergaard,et al.  Dietary fibre for pregnant sows: effect on performance and behaviour , 2001 .

[5]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Effects of floor-feeding and the presence of a foraging substrate on the behaviour and stress physiological response of individually housed gilts , 2003 .

[6]  A. Rérat.  Influence of the nature of carbohydrate intake on the absorption chronology of reducing sugars and volatile fatty acids in the pig. , 1996, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[7]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Effects of dietary fermentable carbohydrates on behavior and heat production in group-housed sows. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[8]  Gerry C. Emmans,et al.  The prediction of the voluntary food intake of pigs on poor quality foods , 1998 .

[9]  Sandra A. Edwards,et al.  Provision of straw as a foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows , 1995 .

[10]  J. Rushen,et al.  Both energy content and bulk of food affect stereotypic behaviour, heart rate and feeding motivation of female pigs , 1997 .

[11]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Development of stereotypic behaviour in sows fed a starch diet or a non-starch polysaccharide diet during gestation and lactation over two parities , 2003 .

[12]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Long-term effects of food allowance and housing on development of stereotypies in pigs , 1993 .

[13]  Sandra A. Edwards,et al.  Effect of dietary fibre on the behaviour and health of the restricted fed sow , 2001 .

[14]  S. Edwards,et al.  Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows , 1995 .

[15]  S. Edwards,et al.  The effect of dietary inclusion of sugar-beet pulp on the feeding behaviour of dry sows , 1997 .

[16]  S. Edwards,et al.  Effect of dietary fibre and feeding system on activity and oral behaviour of group housed gilts , 1994 .

[17]  Christiane L. Girard,et al.  High-fibre diets for sows: effects on stereotypies and adjunctive drinking , 1993 .

[18]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[19]  Michael C. Appleby,et al.  Measuring hunger in the pig using operant conditioning: The effect of food restriction , 1988 .

[20]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  J. Dourmad,et al.  Influence of the nature of dietary fibre on digestive utilization, some metabolite and hormone profiles and the behaviour of pregnant sows. , 2000 .

[22]  K. B. Bach Knudsen,et al.  Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions , 1991, British Journal of Nutrition.

[23]  Sandra A. Edwards,et al.  The influence of dietary fibre and the provision of straw on the development of stereotypic behaviour in food restricted pregnant sows , 1998 .

[24]  J Y Dourmad,et al.  High-fiber diets in pregnant sows: digestive utilization and effects on the behavior of the animals. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[25]  F. Skjøth,et al.  Effects of varying content of soluble dietary fibre from wheat flour and oat milling fractions on gastric emptying in pigs , 1996, British Journal of Nutrition.