‘BENEATH THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG’: THE MULTIPLE FORMS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATIVE LINKAGES

This article focuses on the wide variety of channels through which the process of knowledge transfer occurs. The overall objective is to show the complexity of relationships between researchers and firms in a university system, and to identify some specific factors that influence such interactions. Our case study involves a face-to-face survey of 765 heads of research teams in a regional system to contrast the multiple forms of university-industry collaborative linkages. Drawing on the exploitation of a data set developed for the purpose, we show that for a majority of universities the thrust of their collaborative experiences is devoted to tacit knowledge rather than to intellectual property rights. Researchers actively engage in the provision of different services to firms such as consulting work, commissioned or joint research projects, and human resources training. Research teams also participate in non-academic knowledge dissemination and informal networking. The results of our study enable us to draw some policy implications for university administrators and policymakers. A focus on patents and spin-offs as indicators of collaborative research ignores the limits of many of the economic and productive contexts in which universities are embedded. It may also be detrimental to the strengthening of emerging trends that are oriented towards softer collaborative experiences and other forms of knowledge transfer.

[1]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[2]  Irene Ramos Vielba,et al.  Calidad de las sedes web de las OTRI universitarias andaluzas: contenidos, usabilidad y accesibilidad , 2008 .

[3]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[4]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[5]  L. Zucker,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Firm: The Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers , 1994 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[7]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 , 2022 .

[8]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Reprinted Article Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT , 2009 .

[9]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe , 2007 .

[10]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[11]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[12]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science , 2006 .

[13]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[14]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[15]  Y. Gingras,et al.  The place of universities in the system of knowledge production , 2000 .

[16]  Jason Owen-Smith,et al.  From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities , 2003 .

[17]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[18]  Adam J. Bock,et al.  Inventing Entrepreneurs: Technology Innovators and their Entrepreneurial Journey , 2008 .

[19]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[20]  A. Geuna,et al.  The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[21]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[22]  Scott Frickel,et al.  Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization , 2004 .

[23]  Andrew J. Nelson.  Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion , 2009 .

[24]  P. Shapira,et al.  Rethinking Regional Innovation and Change: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough? , 2005 .

[25]  R. Nelson,et al.  Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents , 1998 .

[26]  Gerard George,et al.  Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity , 2009 .

[27]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .