Multiplex lexical networks reveal patterns in early word acquisition in children

Network models of language have provided a way of linking cognitive processes to language structure. However, current approaches focus only on one linguistic relationship at a time, missing the complex multi-relational nature of language. In this work, we overcome this limitation by modelling the mental lexicon of English-speaking toddlers as a multiplex lexical network, i.e. a multi-layered network where N = 529 words/nodes are connected according to four relationship: (i) free association, (ii) feature sharing, (iii) co-occurrence, and (iv) phonological similarity. We investigate the topology of the resulting multiplex and then proceed to evaluate single layers and the full multiplex structure on their ability to predict empirically observed age of acquisition data of English speaking toddlers. We find that the multiplex topology is an important proxy of the cognitive processes of acquisition, capable of capturing emergent lexicon structure. In fact, we show that the multiplex structure is fundamentally more powerful than individual layers in predicting the ordering with which words are acquired. Furthermore, multiplex analysis allows for a quantification of distinct phases of lexical acquisition in early learners: while initially all the multiplex layers contribute to word learning, after about month 23 free associations take the lead in driving word acquisition.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Martin T. Dove Structure and Dynamics , 2003 .

[4]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Ecological Multilayer Networks: A New Frontier for Network Ecology , 2015 .

[5]  Luis Mario Floría,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation in Multiplex Networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Mercedes Pascual,et al.  The multilayer nature of ecological networks , 2015, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[7]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[8]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[9]  Alireza Goudarzi,et al.  Parasite spreading in spatial ecological multiplex networks , 2016, J. Complex Networks.

[10]  Nick Chater,et al.  Networks in Cognitive Science , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Marcus Kaiser Mean clustering coefficients: the role of isolated nodes and leafs on clustering measures for small-world networks , 2008, 0802.2512.

[12]  Z. Wang,et al.  The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks , 2014, Physics Reports.

[13]  Albert Solé-Ribalta,et al.  Navigability of interconnected networks under random failures , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Melissa K. Stamer,et al.  Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language* , 2011, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[15]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Google and the Mind , 2007, Psychological science.

[16]  Ana Mestrovic,et al.  Multilayer Network of Language: a Unified Framework for Structural Analysis of Linguistic Subsystems , 2015, ArXiv.

[17]  M R Quillian,et al.  Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. , 1967, Behavioral science.

[18]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[19]  Vito Latora,et al.  Structural measures for multiplex networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  Adrien Barbaresi Language-classified Open Subtitles (LACLOS): Download, extraction, and quality assessment , 2014 .

[22]  G. Grimmett,et al.  Probability and random processes , 2002 .

[23]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  The semantic organization of the animal category: evidence from semantic verbal fluency and network theory , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[24]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Author Correction: The physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks , 2016, 1604.02021.

[25]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[26]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Modeling Lexical Acquisition Through Networks , 2015, CogSci.

[27]  Vito Latora,et al.  Interplay between consensus and coherence in a model of interacting opinions , 2015, ArXiv.

[28]  M. Vitevitch What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[30]  Markus Brede,et al.  Patterns in the English language: phonological networks, percolation and assembly models , 2014, ArXiv.

[31]  L. Fenson,et al.  Lexical development norms for young children , 1996 .

[32]  Morgan Sonderegger,et al.  How children explore the phonological network in child-directed speech: A survival analysis of children's first word productions. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[33]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Topology of the conceptual network of language. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Language Networks as Models of Cognition: Understanding Cognition through Language , 2016 .

[35]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Global organization of the Wordnet lexicon , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Christophe,et al.  Learning novel phonological neighbors: Syntactic category matters , 2015, Cognition.

[37]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Multiplexity versus correlation: the role of local constraints in real multiplexes , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Michael S. Vitevitch,et al.  Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[40]  S. Roodenrys,et al.  Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[41]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Using Speakers ’ Referential Intentions to Model Early Cross-Situational Word Learning , 2022 .

[42]  Michael Zock Words in Books, Computers and the Human Mind , 2015 .

[43]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[44]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Multilayer Analysis and Visualization of Networks , 2014, J. Complex Networks.

[45]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Small Worlds and Semantic Network Growth in Typical and Late Talkers , 2011, PloS one.

[46]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[47]  R. Mccall,et al.  The Genetic and Environmental Origins of Learning Abilities and Disabilities in the Early School , 2007, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[48]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Word learning as Bayesian inference. , 2007, Psychological review.

[49]  J. Aitchison Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon , 1987 .

[50]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Multilayer networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[51]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Early Semantic Networks , 2009, Psychological science.

[52]  A. Arenas,et al.  Mathematical Formulation of Multilayer Networks , 2013, 1307.4977.

[53]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[54]  Ramon Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  The small world of human language , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Variability in early communicative development. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[56]  Helena Bolli Mota,et al.  Early lexical and phonological acquisition and its relationships. , 2014, CoDAS.

[57]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Complex Structures and Semantics in Free Word Association , 2012, Adv. Complex Syst..

[58]  Vito Latora,et al.  Structural reducibility of multilayer networks , 2015, Nature Communications.

[59]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes , 2015, Nature Communications.

[60]  Gert Storms,et al.  Word associations: Network and semantic properties , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[61]  Michael Szell,et al.  Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  The physics of multilayer networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[63]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Wordbank: an open repository for developmental vocabulary data* , 2016, Journal of Child Language.

[65]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[66]  Massimo Stella,et al.  Investigating the Phonetic Organisation of the English Language via Phonological Networks, Percolation and Markov Models , 2014, ECCS.

[67]  Yoed N. Kenett,et al.  Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[69]  Alexandre Arenas,et al.  Semantic Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2010, Entropy.

[70]  Miguel Romance,et al.  Eigenvector centrality of nodes in multiplex networks , 2013, Chaos.