Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph

Brain PET in small structures is challenged by low resolution inducing bias in the activity measurements. Improved spatial resolution may be obtained by using dedicated tomographs and more comprehensive modeling of the acquisition system during reconstruction. In this study, we assess the impact of resolution modeling (RM) during reconstruction on image quality and on the estimates of biologic parameters in a clinical study performed on a high-resolution research tomograph. Methods: An accelerated list-mode ordinary Poisson ordered-subset expectation maximization (OP-OSEM) algorithm, including sinogram-based corrections and an experimental stationary model of resolution, has been designed. Experimental phantom studies are used to assess contrast and noise characteristics of the reconstructed images. The binding potential of a selective tracer of the dopamine transporter is also assessed in anatomic volumes of interest in a 5-patient study. Results: In the phantom experiment, a slower convergence and a higher contrast recovery are observed for RM-OP-OSEM than for OP-OSEM for the same level of statistical noise. RM-OP-OSEM yields contrast recovery levels that could not be reached without RM as well as better visual recovery of the smallest spheres and better delineation of the structures in the reconstructed images. Statistical noise has lower variance at the voxel level with RM than without at matched resolution. In a uniform activity region, RM induces higher positive and lower negative correlations with neighboring voxels, leading to lower spatial variance. Clinical images reconstructed with RM demonstrate better delineation of cortical and subcortical structures in both time-averaged and parametric images. The binding potential in the striatum is also increased, a result similar to the one observed in the phantom study. Conclusion: In high-resolution PET, RM during reconstruction improves quantitative accuracy by reducing the partial-volume effects.

[1]  R. Leahy,et al.  Accurate geometric and physical response modelling for statistical image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[2]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1998 .

[3]  P. Grangeat,et al.  Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine , 1996, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[4]  K. Erlandsson,et al.  Fast accurate iterative reconstruction for low-statistics positron volume imaging. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  A. Rahmim,et al.  The second generation HRRT - a multi-centre scanner performance investigation , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[6]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Effect of errors in the system matrix on maximum a posteriori image reconstruction , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  F. Bataille,et al.  Brain PET Partial-Volume Compensation Using Blurred Anatomical Labels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Claude Comtat,et al.  Assessment of 11C-PE2I Binding to the Neuronal Dopamine Transporter in Humans with the High-Spatial-Resolution PET Scanner HRRT , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Data Acquisition and Image Reconstruction for 3D PET , 1998 .

[12]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Variance reduction on randoms from coincidence histograms for the HRRT , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[13]  Reginald L. Lagendijk,et al.  Regularized iterative image restoration with ringing reduction , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[14]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  Imaging Human Mesolimbic Dopamine Transmission with Positron Emission Tomography: I. Accuracy and Precision of D2 Receptor Parameter Measurements in Ventral Striatum , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Space-variant and anisotropic resolution modeling in list-mode EM reconstruction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[17]  Yuchen Yan,et al.  A system for the 3D reconstruction of retracted-septa PET data using the EM algorithm , 1995 .

[18]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. Comtat,et al.  OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[20]  L. Lucy.  An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[21]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Improved noise propagation in statistical image reconstruction with resolution modeling , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[22]  M. Casey,et al.  SPMD cluster-based parallel 3D OSEM , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  R. Siddon.  Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[24]  D. Snyder,et al.  Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[25]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[26]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[27]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  R. Leahy,et al.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction , 2002 .

[29]  C. Comtat,et al.  List-mode reconstruction with system modeling derived from projections , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[30]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[31]  D. Townsend,et al.  The Theory and Practice of 3D PET , 1998, Developments in Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Fully 3D Bayesian image reconstruction for the ECAT EXACT HR , 1997 .