An empirical investigation on the impact of XBRL adoption on information asymmetry: Evidence from Europe

Given the high cost of developing and implementing data standards such as eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), it is critical to assess their influences before they are adopted on a large scale. The European Parliament has voted for the new Transparency Directive that calls for the mandatory preparation of annual business performance reports in a single electronic reporting from January 1, 2020 based on a cost-benefit analysis by European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), with due reference to current and future technological options such as XBRL. Regulators in many other jurisdictions such as Canadian Securities Administrators are also assessing the costs and benefits from XBRL adoption. This paper informs such analysis by examining whether the expected benefit of information asymmetry reduction is realized through XBRL adoption in a European context. XBRL adoption among European non-financial firms is found to significantly increase market liquidity and thus reduce information asymmetry. The association is stronger for larger firms that have sufficient resources and expertise to properly implement the technology. The empirical findings also suggest that the association is stronger for non-high-technology firms whose financial statements affected by XBRL are more reliant upon by investors. Based on these findings, XBRL evidences a viable option as an electronic reporting format with effective implementation for businesses. Higher market liquidity/lower information asymmetry is associated with the XBRL adoption among European non-financial firms.The association is stronger for larger firms with sufficient resources and expertise to properly implement the technology.The association is larger for non-high-technology firms whose financial statements are more reliant upon by investors.XBRL evidences a viable option as an electronic reporting format with effective implementation for businesses.

[1]  Robert A. McLean High-Technology Intangibles and Analysts' Forecasts , 2002 .

[2]  Philip Powell,et al.  The impact of information technology on information asymmetry , 1998 .

[3]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  The impact of early XBRL adoption on analysts’ forecast accuracy - empirical evidence from China , 2014, Electron. Mark..

[5]  Eileen Zalkin Taylor,et al.  Avoiding Common Errors of XBRL Implementation , 2010 .

[6]  Edgar J. Sullivan A New Estimate of Transaction Costs , 2000 .

[7]  David A. Lesmond Liquidity of emerging markets , 2005 .

[8]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry , 2011 .

[9]  Jacob Peng,et al.  Applying XBRL in an Accounting Information System Design Using the REA Approach: An Instructional Case* , 2010 .

[10]  David Y. Chan,et al.  Consequences of XBRL Standardization on Financial Statement Data , 2012, J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Chunhui Liu,et al.  XBRL: A New Global Paradigm for Business Financial Reporting , 2013, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[12]  John J. Wild,et al.  Disclosure Policy and Market Liquidity: Impact of Depth Quotes and Order Sizes* , 2005 .

[13]  Charles Trzcinka,et al.  A New Estimate of Transaction Costs , 1999 .

[14]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets , 2000 .

[15]  Craig W. Holden,et al.  New Low-Frequency Spread Measures , 2009 .

[16]  Faten Lakhal,et al.  Stock market liquidity and information asymmetry around voluntary earnings disclosures , 2013 .

[17]  Tawei Wang,et al.  The Association between XBRL Adoption and Market Reactions to Earnings Surprises , 2015, J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Frank Heflin,et al.  Disclosure Quality and Market Liquidity , 2000 .

[19]  H. Mendelson,et al.  Market Microstructure and Securities Values: Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange , 1996 .

[20]  Laureen A. Maines,et al.  Does Search-facilitating Technology Improve the Transparency of Financial Reporting? , 2004 .

[21]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[22]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  The impact of XBRL adoption in PR China , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  Robert E. Jensen,et al.  Customized Financial Reporting, Networked Databases, and Distributed File Sharing , 2001 .

[24]  Craig W. Holden,et al.  Do Liquidity Measures Measure Liquidity , 2009 .

[25]  Louis H. Amato,et al.  Retail Philanthropy: Firm Size, Industry, and Business Cycle , 2012 .

[26]  Diane J. Janvrin,et al.  XBRL Implementation: A Field Investigation to Identify Research Opportunities , 2012, J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Michael Welker,et al.  Disclosure Policy, Information Asymmetry, and Liquidity in Equity Markets* , 1995 .

[28]  John C. Groth,et al.  Liquidity, exchange listing, and common stock performance , 1985 .

[29]  Lee J. Yao,et al.  The Impact of IFRS on Accounting Quality in a Regulated Market , 2011 .

[30]  Mei Feng,et al.  Special Purpose Vehicles: Empirical Evidence on Determinants and Earnings Management , 2009 .

[31]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Does the Year 2000 XBRL Taxonomy Accommodate Current Business Financial-Reporting Practice? , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Siew H. Chan,et al.  The influence of firm specific context on realizing information technology business value in manufacturing industry , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[33]  D. Hecker High-Technology Employment: A Broader View , 1999 .

[34]  Joanne Locke,et al.  Digital business reporting standards: mapping the battle in France , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Victoria Y. Yoon,et al.  Ontology based integration of XBRL filings for financial decision making , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Information Capabilities Design on Business Process Outsourcing Performance , 2010, MIS Q..

[37]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Financial Reporting in XBRL on the SEC's EDGAR System: A Critique and Evaluation , 2005, J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Christian Leuz,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure , 1999 .

[39]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[40]  Shaomin Li,et al.  Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: early evidence , 2008, CACM.

[41]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Adopting organizational virtualization in B2B firms: An empirical study in Singapore , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Antonio Vezzani,et al.  The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations , 2015 .

[43]  H. Berkman,et al.  Short-term traders and liquidity:: a test using Bombay Stock Exchange data , 1998 .

[44]  Shiyou Li,et al.  The Association between Extensions in XBRL Disclosures and Financial Information Environment , 2015, J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Yu Cong,et al.  The Impact of XBRL Reporting on Market Efficiency , 2014, J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  W. Gillette,et al.  Disclosure policy. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[47]  Stephan Kudyba,et al.  Research Report: Increasing Returns to Information Technology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  B. Eckbo,et al.  Liquidity Risk, Leverage and Long-Run IPO Returns , 2005 .

[49]  Jose A. Lopez What is liquidity risk , 2008 .

[50]  Anthony Saunders,et al.  Are Banks Still Special When There is a Secondary Market for Loans? , 2011 .

[51]  Jose Benitez-Amado,et al.  Information technology, the organizational capability of proactive corporate environmental strategy and firm performance: a resource-based analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Faten Lakhal,et al.  Stock Market Liquidity and Information Asymmetry Around Voluntary Earnings Announcements: New Evidence from France , 2004 .

[53]  Arun Rai,et al.  Technology investment and business performance , 1997, CACM.

[54]  Utpal Bhattacharya,et al.  INSIDERS, OUTSIDERS AND MARKET BREAKDOWNS , 1991 .

[55]  Harris Wu,et al.  Assessing the quality of large-scale data standards: A case of XBRL GAAP Taxonomy , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  Robert Radcliffe,et al.  Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test , 1998 .

[57]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature , 2000 .

[58]  B. Miller,et al.  Initial evidence on the market impact of the XBRL mandate , 2013, Review of Accounting Studies.

[59]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure , 1999 .

[60]  D. Hecker,et al.  High-Technology Employment: A NAICS-Based Update: Among High-Technology Industries-Those with a High Proportion of Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians-Some Are Projected to Grow Rapidly; Overall, However, This Group of Industries Is Expected to Continue to Grow Slowly , 2005 .

[61]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evaluating cross-organizational impacts of information technology – an empirical analysis , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Mitchell R. Wenger,et al.  Global Ledger - The Next Step for XBRL: Leveraging the Potential Throughout the Accounting Cycle , 2011 .

[63]  Paul P. Tallon Do you see what I see? The search for consensus among executives’ perceptions of IT business value , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Jian Wang,et al.  Impact of industry type, ownership and company size on Chinese firms' e-business strategy , 2009 .

[65]  Jap Efendi,et al.  Does the XBRL Reporting Format Provide Incremental Information Value? A Study Using XBRL Disclosures During the Voluntary Filing Program , 2016 .

[66]  Peter L. Bernstein,et al.  Liquidity , 1983 .

[67]  L. Yao,et al.  XBRL’s impact on analyst forecast behavior: An empirical study , 2014 .

[68]  Lina Zhou,et al.  Improving financial data quality using ontologies , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[69]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Peer‐Based Approach for Analytical Procedures , 2006 .

[70]  Janice M. Burn,et al.  Distributing Global Information Systems Resources in Multinational Companies , 1994 .