A comparison of model‐based and data‐driven controller tuning

In many industrial applications, finding a model from physical laws that is both simple and reliable for control design is a hard and time-consuming undertaking. When a set of input/output measurements is available, one can derive the controller directly from data, without relying on the knowledge of the physics. In the scientific literature, two main approaches have been proposed for control system design from data. In the 'model-based' approach, a model of the system is first derived from data and then a controller is computed-based on the model. In the 'data-driven' approach, the controller is directly computed from data. In this work, the previous approaches are compared from a novel perspective. The main finding of the paper is that, although from the standard perspective of parameter variance analysis the model-based approach is always statistically more efficient, the data-driven controller might outperform the model-based solution for what concerns the final control cost. Copyright (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[2]  Fredrik Tjärnström Variance analysis of L2 model reduction when undermodeling - the output error case , 2003, Autom..

[3]  Klaske van Heusden Non-Iterative Data-Driven Model Reference Control , 2010 .

[4]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification , 1983 .

[5]  A. Karimi,et al.  Non-iterative data-driven controller tuning using the correlation approach , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[6]  Simone Formentin,et al.  Fast tuning of cascade control systems , 2011 .

[7]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .

[8]  Robert L. Kosut Uncertainty Model Unfalsification for Robust Adaptive Control , 1998 .

[9]  S. Zacks The theory of statistical inference , 1972 .

[10]  Ioan Doré Landau,et al.  A Flexible Transmission System as a Benchmark for Robust Digital Control , 1995, Eur. J. Control.

[11]  Michael G. Safonov,et al.  The unfalsified control concept and learning , 1997 .

[12]  A. Karimi,et al.  Data‐driven model reference control with asymptotically guaranteed stability , 2011 .

[13]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[14]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  I design to generalize internal model control , 2006, Autom..

[15]  A. Karimi,et al.  Iterative correlation‐based controller tuning , 2004 .

[16]  Carlo Novara,et al.  The filter design from data (FD2) problem: parametric‐statistical approach , 2012 .

[17]  Sergio M. Savaresi,et al.  Virtual reference feedback tuning: a direct method for the design of feedback controllers , 2002, Autom..

[18]  Torsten Söderström,et al.  On identification methods for direct data‐driven controller tuning , 2011 .

[19]  Antonio Sala,et al.  Extensions to "virtual reference feedback tuning: A direct method for the design of feedback controllers" , 2005, Autom..

[20]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  From experiment design to closed-loop control , 2005, Autom..

[21]  S. Gunnarsson,et al.  A convergent iterative restricted complexity control design scheme , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[23]  Sergio M. Savaresi,et al.  Virtual reference direct design method: an off-line approach to data-based control system design , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[24]  Matteo Corno,et al.  Data-Driven Design of Braking Control Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[25]  Thomas Parisini,et al.  Model-free actuator fault detection using a spectral estimation approach: the case of the DAMADICS benchmark problem , 2003 .

[26]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  L2 Model reduction and variance reduction , 2000, Autom..