Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation

Abstract This study is focused on analyses of scale dependency of lumped hydrological models with different formulations of the infiltration processes. Three lumped hydrological models of differing complexity were used in the study: the SAC-SMA model, the Oregon State University (OSU) model, and the simple water balance (SWB) model. High-resolution (4×4 km) rainfall estimates from the next generation weather radar (NEXRAD) Stage III in the Arkansas-Red river basin were used in the study. These gridded precipitation estimates are a multi-sensor product which combines the spatial resolution of the radar data with the ground truth estimates of the gage data. Results were generated from each model using different resolutions of spatial averaging of hourly rainfall. Although all selected models were scale dependent, the level of dependency varied significantly with different formulations of the rainfall-runoff partitioning mechanism. Infiltration-excess type models were the most sensitive. Saturation-excess type models were less scale dependent. Probabilistic averaging of the point processes reduces scale dependency, however, its effectiveness varies depending on the scale and the spatial structure of rainfall.

[1]  Y. Xue,et al.  Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations , 1996 .

[2]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[3]  Keith Loague Impact of rainfall and soil hydraulic property information on runoff predictions at the hillslope scale , 1988 .

[4]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The NWS River Forecast System - catchment modeling. , 1995 .

[5]  N. Kouwen,et al.  RESOLUTION CONSIDERATIONS IN USING RADAR RAINFALL DATA FOR FLOOD FORECASTING , 1989 .

[6]  Paul O'Connell,et al.  Modelling the effects of spatial variability in rainfall on catchment response. 2. Experiments with distributed and lumped models , 1996 .

[7]  R. Moore The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales , 1985 .

[8]  R. Fulton,et al.  WSR-88D Precipitation Processing and Its Use in National Weather Service Hydrologic Forecasting , 1993 .

[9]  V. Klemeš Conceptualization and scale in hydrology , 1983 .

[10]  H. Pan,et al.  A two-layer model of soil hydrology , 1984 .

[11]  Roni Avissar,et al.  Scaling of land-atmosphere interactions: An atmospheric modelling perspective , 1995 .

[12]  P. S. Eagleson,et al.  Land Surface Hydrology Parameterization for Atmospheric General Circulation models Including Subgrid Scale Spatial Variability , 1989 .

[13]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm , 1998 .

[14]  K. Beven,et al.  Channel network hydrology , 1993 .

[15]  R. Mein,et al.  Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models , 1978 .

[16]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs , 1997 .

[17]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  An Intercomparison Study of NEXRAD Precipitation Estimates , 1996 .

[18]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Simple water balance model for estimating runoff at different spatial and temporal scales , 1996 .

[19]  Keith Beven,et al.  The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: an evaluation using observed data , 1994 .

[20]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data , 1998 .

[21]  K. Beven,et al.  Similarity and scale in catchment storm response , 1990 .

[22]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Runoff model sensitivity to radar rainfall resolution , 1994 .