Mate Choice Copying in Humans

There is substantial evidence that in human mate choice, females directly select males based on male display of both physical and behavioral traits. In non-humans, there is additionally a growing literature on indirect mate choice, such as choice through observing and subsequently copying the mating preferences of conspecifics (mate choice copying). Given that humans are a social species with a high degree of sharing information, long-term pair bonds, and high parental care, it is likely that human females could avoid substantial costs associated with directly searching for information about potential males by mate choice copying. The present study was a test of whether women perceived men to be more attractive when men were presented with a female date or consort than when they were presented alone, and whether the physical attractiveness of the female consort affected women’s copying decisions. The results suggested that women’s mate choice decision rule is to copy only if a man’s female consort is physically attractive. Further analyses implied that copying may be a conditional female mating tactic aimed at solving the problem of informational constraints on assessing male suitability for long-term sexual relationships, and that lack of mate choice experience, measured as reported lifetime number of sex partners, is also an important determinant of copying.

[1]  L A Dugatkin,et al.  Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  C. Larsson,et al.  Male coloration as an indicator of parental quality in the yellowhammer, Emberiza citrinella , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Klaudia Witte,et al.  Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male , 2003 .

[4]  D. Perrett,et al.  Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence , 2000 .

[5]  D. Waynforth,et al.  The influence of women's mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture , 2005 .

[6]  A. Booth,et al.  Testosterone and Men's Marriages , 1993 .

[7]  J. Wiehn Plumage characteristics as an indicator of male parental quality in the American Kestrel , 1997 .

[8]  Susan U. Linville,et al.  Plumage brightness as an indicator of parental care in northern cardinals , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  William G. Graziano,et al.  Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back in interpersonal attraction. , 1993 .

[10]  N. Burley The Differential-Allocation Hypothesis: An Experimental Test , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[11]  R. Morris,et al.  Testosterone, Social Class, and Antisocial Behavior in a Sample of 4,462 Men , 1990 .

[12]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry , 1997 .

[13]  L. D. Green,et al.  Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 1996 .

[14]  The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .

[16]  D. Buss,et al.  Strategies of Human Mating , 2006 .

[17]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Developmental stability and human violence , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Simpson,et al.  Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Lisa M. Munger,et al.  Mate Choice Copying in Female Humpback Limia (Limia nigrofasciata, Family Poeciliidae) , 2004 .

[20]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  T. Bereczkei,et al.  Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice. , 2010, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[22]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  D. Waynforth Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize , 1999 .

[24]  A. Qvarnström Experimentally increased badge size increases male competition and reduces male parental care in the collared flycatcher , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  J. Bailey,et al.  What Distinguishes Women with Unusually High Numbers of Sex Partners , 1999 .

[26]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Conditional Mate Choice Strategies in Humans: Evidence from ‘Lonely Hearts’ Advertisements , 1995 .

[27]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .

[28]  A. Rao,et al.  No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality , 2000 .

[29]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[30]  F. de Zegher,et al.  Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty. , 1999, European journal of orthodontics.

[31]  J. Sabini,et al.  How are Sociosexuality, Sex Drive, and Lifetime Number of Sexual Partners Related? , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[32]  Doug Jones,et al.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations , 1993, Human nature.

[33]  Tobias Uller,et al.  Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect , 2003, Human nature.

[34]  Gary L. Brase,et al.  Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios , 2004, Human Nature.

[35]  K. Grammer,et al.  Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design , 2001 .

[36]  A. Booth,et al.  Testosterone and mens marriages. , 1992 .

[37]  J. Udry,et al.  Biological Predispositions and Social Control in Adolescent Sexual Behavior. , 1988 .

[38]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Phunny Stuph.