Artery-vein separation via MRA-An image processing approach

Presents a near-automatic process for separating vessels from background and other clutter as well as for separating arteries and veins in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiographic (CE-MRA) image data, and an optimal method for three-dimensional visualization of vascular structures. The separation process utilizes fuzzy connected object delineation principles and algorithms. The first step of this separation process is the segmentation of the entire vessel structure from the background and other clutter via absolute fuzzy connectedness. The second step is to separate artery from vein within this entire vessel structure via iterative relative fuzzy connectedness. After seed voxels are specified inside the artery and vein in the CE-MRA image, the small regions of the bigger aspects of artery and vein are separated in the initial iterations, and further detailed aspects of artery and vein are included in later iterations. At each iteration, the artery and vein compete among themselves to grab membership of each voxel in the vessel structure based on the relative strength of connectedness of the voxel in the artery and vein. This approach has been implemented in a software package for routine use in a clinical setting and tested on 133 CE-MRA studies of the pelvic region and two studies of the carotid system from 6 different hospitals. In all studies, unified parameter settings produced correct artery-vein separation. When compared with manual segmentation/separation, the authors' algorithms were able to separate higher order branches, and therefore produced vastly more details in the segmented vascular structure. The total operator and computer time taken per study is on the average about 4.5 min. To date, this technique seems to be the only image processing approach that can be routinely applied for artery and vein separation.

[1]  W. Bilker,et al.  Atrophy and High Intensity Lesions , 2000, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[2]  R S Balaban,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast in MR imaging of the heart. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  D. Hemmy,et al.  A Pentium Personal Computer‐Based Craniofacial Three‐Dimensional Imaging and Analysis System , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  M. Prince,et al.  Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Shell rendering , 1993, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[6]  Dev P. Chakraborty,et al.  Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Emmanuelle Canet,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced 3D‐TOF MRA of peripheral vessels: Intravascular versus extracellular MR contrast media , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  E M Haacke,et al.  Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with fat saturation and magnetization transfer contrast. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  N M Rofsky,et al.  Thoracic aorta: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  N M Rofsky,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  An ultra-fast user-steered image segmentation paradigm: live wire on the fly , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  G Kretschmer,et al.  Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[13]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Clutter‐free volume rendering for magnetic resonance angiography using fuzzy connectedness , 2000 .

[14]  G C McKinnon,et al.  Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[15]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Clutter-free volume rendering for magnetic resonance angiography using fuzzy connectedness , 2000, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[16]  F. Steybe MRA of the Aorta , Renal and Pelvic Arteries : Extracellular vs . Intravascular Contrast Agents , 1999 .

[17]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Enhanced Artery Visualization in Blood Pool MRA: Results in the Peripheral Vasculature , 1999, IPMI.

[18]  D C Peters,et al.  Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  3D MR angiographic visualization and artery-vein separation , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Multiple sclerosis lesion quantification using fuzzy-connectedness principles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Scale-Based Fuzzy Connected Image Segmentation: Theory, Algorithms, and Validation , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[22]  Sebastian Stier,et al.  Extraction of line properties based on direction fields , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Claudio Gatti,et al.  Vascular visualization using IAP , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[24]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Three-dimensional rendering in medicine: some common misconceptions , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[25]  B K Rutt,et al.  Sliding interleaved KY (SLINKY) acquisition: A novel 3D MRA technique with suppressed slab boundary artifact , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  E Kent Yucel Visualization techniques for blood pool contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[27]  C. Paschal,et al.  Variablemangle uniform signal excitation (vuse) for threel dimensional time‐of‐flight MR angiography , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Stina Svensson,et al.  Gray-scale connectivity concept for visualizing MRA and CTA volumes , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[29]  Orjan Smedby,et al.  New presentation method for magnetic resonance angiography images based on skeletonization , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[30]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Fuzzy connectedness and image segmentation , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[31]  J K Udupa,et al.  Differences between relapsing-remitting and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis as determined with quantitative MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[32]  J K Udupa,et al.  Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR images--lack of correlation between changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical findings. , 1999, Radiology.

[33]  R. Dolan,et al.  MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[34]  J. Udupa,et al.  A new computer-assisted method for the quantification of enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  M. Prince,et al.  Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  S DeSena,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Fuzzy-connected 3D image segmentation at interactive speeds , 2000, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[38]  Yutaka Hata,et al.  Automatic segmentation of blood vessels from MR angiography volume data by using fuzzy logic technique , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[39]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  On Digital Distance Transforms in Three Dimensions , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[40]  J F Debatin,et al.  Human aorta: preliminary results with virtual endoscopy based on three-dimensional MR imaging data sets. , 1996, Radiology.