Learning to focus on number

With age and education, children become increasingly accurate in processing numerosity. This developmental trend is often interpreted as a progressive refinement of the mental representation of number. Here we provide empirical and theoretical support for an alternative possibility, the filtering hypothesis, which proposes that development primarily affects the ability to focus on the relevant dimension of number and to avoid interference from irrelevant but often co-varying quantitative dimensions. Data from the same numerical comparison task in adults and children of various levels of numeracy, including Mundurucú Indians and western dyscalculics, show that, as predicted by the filtering hypothesis, age and education primarily increase the ability to focus on number and filter out potentially interfering information on the non-numerical dimensions. These findings can be captured by a minimal computational model where learning consists in the training of a multivariate classifier whose discrimination boundaries get progressively aligned to the task-relevant dimension of number. This view of development has important consequences for education.

[1]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  Topographic representations of object size and relationships with numerosity reveal generalized quantity processing in human parietal cortex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Nicolas Delcroix,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children: a neo-Piagetian approach. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[4]  D. Melcher,et al.  Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity , 2011, Cognition.

[5]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants. , 2009, Developmental science.

[7]  Ivilin Peev Stoianov,et al.  Number skills are maintained in healthy ageing , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  B. Dosher,et al.  The dynamics of perceptual learning: an incremental reweighting model. , 2005, Psychological review.

[10]  E. Brannon,et al.  The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: using number is just easier. , 2008, Child development.

[11]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[13]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Probing the nature of deficits in the 'Approximate Number System' in children with persistent Developmental Dyscalculia. , 2016, Developmental science.

[14]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Contributions of primate prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices to length and numerosity representation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  P. Viswanathan,et al.  Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons , 2015, Current Biology.

[16]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Jacqueline Leybaert,et al.  Does math education modify the approximate number system? A comparison of schooled and unschooled adults , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[18]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System , 2013, Psychological science.

[19]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Summation of Large Numerousness by Newborn Chicks , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[20]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Amy Devine,et al.  Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and children , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[23]  A. Content,et al.  Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  E. Brannon,et al.  Attending to One of Many: When Infants are Surprisingly Poor at Discriminating an Item's Size , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[26]  Ariel Starr,et al.  The contributions of numerical acuity and non-numerical stimulus features to the development of the number sense and symbolic math achievement , 2017, Cognition.

[27]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[28]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[29]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Monkeys Match the Number of Voices They Hear to the Number of Faces They See , 2005, Current Biology.

[30]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Support-vector networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[31]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  Darko Odic Children's intuitive sense of number develops independently of their perception of area, density, length, and time. , 2018, Developmental science.

[34]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[35]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[36]  C. F. Foard,et al.  Holistic and analytic modes of processing: the multiple determinants of perceptual analysis. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neural foundations and functional specificity of number representations , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features , 2015, Cognition.

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[40]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[41]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Definition , 1960, A Philosopher Looks at Sport.

[42]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The Neural Basis of Perceptual Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[43]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  The Upward Bias in Measures of Information Derived from Limited Data Samples , 1995, Neural Computation.

[44]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[45]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.