Layers of Shared and Cooperative Control, assistance and automation

Abstract: Over the last centuries we have experienced scientific, technological and societal progress that enabled the creation of intelligent assisted and automated machines with increasing abilities, and require a conscious distribution of roles and control between humans and machines. Machines can be more than either fully automated or manually controlled, but can work together with the human on different levels of assistance and automation in a hopefully beneficial cooperation. One way of cooperation is that the automation and the human have a shared control over a situation, e.g. a vehicle in an environment. The objective of this paper is to provide a common meta model of shared and cooperative assistance and automation. The meta models based on insight from the H(orse)-methaphor (Flemisch et al, 2003; Goodrich et al., 2006) and Human-Machine Cooperation principles (Hoc and Lemoine, 1998; Pacaux-Lemoine and Debernard, 2002; Pacaux-Lemoine, 2014), are presented and combined in order to propose a framework and criteria to design safe, efficient, ecological and attractive systems. Cooperation is presented from different points of view such as levels of activity (operational, tactical and strategic levels) (Lemoine et al, 1996) as well as the type of function shared between Human and machine (information gathering, information analysis, decision selection, action implementation) (Parasuraman et al., 2000). Examples will be provided in the aviation domain (e.g. Goodrich et. al 2012) and the automotive domain with the automation of driving (Hoeger et al, 2008; Flemisch et al., 2016; Tricot et al., 2004; Pacaux-Lemoine et al, 2004; Pacaux-Lemoine et al., 2015).

[1]  Patrick Millot,et al.  A Common Work Space for a Mutual Enrichment of Human-Machine Cooperation and Team-Situation Awareness , 2013, IFAC HMS.

[2]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Human-Centered Aviation Automation: Principles and Guidelines , 1996 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  Highly Automated Vehicles for Intelligent Transport: Have-It Approach , 2008 .

[5]  P. Millot,et al.  Man-machine cooperative organizations: formal and pragmatic implementation methods , 1995 .

[6]  Serge Boverie,et al.  The Importance of Driver State Assessment Within Highly Automated Vehicles , 2009 .

[7]  Marie‐Pierre Pacaux‐Lemoine Human–Machine Cooperation Principles to Support Life‐Critical Systems Management , 2014 .

[8]  A. R. Hale,et al.  Human error models as predictors of accident scenarios for designers in road transport systems , 1990 .

[9]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Cooperative work: A conceptual framework , 1991 .

[10]  Hermann Winner,et al.  Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire , 2014, Ergonomics.

[11]  Paul C. Schutte,et al.  The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction , 2005 .

[12]  Christian Löper,et al.  Kooperative, manöverbasierte Automation und Arbitrierung als Bausteine für hochautomatisiertes Fahren , 2008 .

[13]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Towards Levels of Cooperation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  Serge Debernard,et al.  Cooperation between humans and machines: First results of an experiment with a multi-level cooperative organisation in air traffic control , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  Herve Morvan,et al.  An Analysis of Driver's Avoiding Maneuver in a Highly Emergency Situation , 2015 .

[16]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[17]  Kenneth H. Goodrich,et al.  Application of the H-Mode, A Design and Interaction Concept for Highly Automated Vehicles, to Aircraft , 2006, 2006 ieee/aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[18]  Peggy Subirats,et al.  From technological acceptability to appropriation by users: methodological steps for device assessment in road safety. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Reiner Onken The Cognitive Cockpit Assistant Systems CASSY/CAMA , 1999 .

[20]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Frederic Robache,et al.  Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part I: a driving simulator study. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Towards Vertical and Horizontal Extension of Shared Control Concept , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Cognitive Evaluation of Human-Human and Human-Machine Cooperation Modes in Air Traffic Control , 1998 .